valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

uniQure N.V. (QURE) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$0.00 ComplexityExtreme Updated
Business condition attached to the margin of safety uniQure has an approved product, or a regulator-agreed path to approval for AMT-130, and its operations have moved to positive owner earnings after stock compensation.
uniQure is a Dutch-domiciled gene-therapy developer. Its only revenue is royalty and license income from CSL Behring on HEMGENIX, the hemophilia B gene therapy it developed and licensed: $16.1 million in 2025, $27.1 million in 2024 and $15.8 million in 2023. Most of the royalty stream has been sold. In May 2023 uniQure received $375 million upfront from an investor (HemB SPV) in exchange for its future HEMGENIX royalties, and the filing treats this as a debt-like liability of about $473 million at the end of 2025, growing by non-cash interest of $54 million in 2025. The lead development program, AMT-130 for Huntington's disease, has no marketed product behind it yet. Owner earnings (cash from operations, less working-capital swings, stock compensation and maintenance capital spending) have been deeply negative every year we measured: about $(3.72) per share in 2023, $(4.15) in 2024 and $(3.29) in 2025, or roughly $(189) million in 2025. Cash used in operations was $178 million in 2025 against revenue of $16 million. Growth-path check: owner earnings per share improved about 21 percent in 2025, but they remain far below zero, and the improvement came from lower spending and a larger share count after the September 2025 equity offering, not from a business that earns money. Why each case is worth zero. Our method only credits value that is contracted, already operating, or the output of a long, repeated process. The company holds $624.1 million of cash, cash equivalents and investments, and says this funds operations into the second half of 2029. Under our method that cash is not added on top of an earnings stream, because the earnings stream is negative; it is being consumed by the research programs. The remaining HEMGENIX royalty income is small and largely committed to the royalty investor, so it does not offset a burn of roughly $180 million a year. Bear case: research spending continues, the regulatory path for AMT-130 stays unresolved, and no product revenue arrives. The business consumes its cash and worth nothing to shareholders on earnings we can evidence. Base case: same, because nothing named and evidenced turns owner earnings positive. Bull case: also zero. The obvious upside is an approved AMT-130, but on December 2025 and March 2026 the FDA told the company that its Phase I/II data compared to an external control are not sufficient evidence for approval and strongly recommended a randomized, double-blind, sham-surgery-controlled trial. There is no agreed approval path, no timetable, and no contracted sales, so we cannot credit any value for it. Other pipeline candidates (AMT-162, AMT-191, AMT-260) are early-stage and are likewise not credited. What would make this wrong: a regulator agreeing to an accelerated approval route for AMT-130, or strong HEMGENIX sales growth releasing royalties back to uniQure, would create real value that we do not count today. Because the case rests on the absence of evidenced earnings rather than a positive estimate, investors who value the pipeline directly are making a bet, not a valuation from evidenced cash flows. We did not include a value for cash on hand, which is our method's rule, and stock-based compensation of $17.7 million a year is treated as a real cost. Earlier years (2021 and 2022) are not stored because the 2021 cash flow reflects a one-time CSL license payment and we could not cleanly split working-capital items for 2022.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 -$3.29 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$(177.963)M; ΔWC (receivables/prepaids +AP + accrued) = $(6.790)M cash effect, so removing it adds back $6.790M; SBC=$17.679M; capex=$0.439M, growth capex=$0 (revenue declined) so maintenance capex=$0.439M; OE=$(189.291)M; diluted shares=57.502M; OE/sh=$(3.29). Contingent consideration milestone payments and inventory lines excluded from WC. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001104659-26-021898.
2024 -$4.15 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$(182.728)M; ΔWC = $(6.365)M cash effect (receivables/prepaids $(2.243)M, AP +$1.520M, accrued $(5.642)M), removed so +$6.365M; SBC=$22.258M; capex=$3.368M, growth capex=$0 (no revenue-driven expansion; revenue up but capex tiny, treated as maintenance) so maintenance capex=$3.368M; OE=$(201.989)M; diluted shares=48.649M; OE/sh=$(4.15). Source: FY2025 10-K (comparative), accession 0001104659-26-021898; FY2024 10-K 0001558370-25-001699.
2023 -$3.72 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$(145.929)M; ΔWC = $(10.820)M cash effect (receivables/prepaids $(1.323)M, AP $(4.169)M, accrued $(5.328)M), removed so +$10.820M; SBC=$35.093M; capex=$7.154M treated as maintenance (tiny vs. burn); OE=$(177.356)M; diluted shares=47.671M; OE/sh=$(3.72). Note: 2023 CFO includes the $375M Royalty Financing upfront only in financing, not CFO. Source: FY2025 10-K comparative, accession 0001104659-26-021898; FY2023 10-K 0001558370-24-001915.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
All revenue comes from one licensee, CSL Behring, as royalty and license payments on HEMGENIX; no products sold directly by the company. Operations in Amsterdam (Netherlands), Lexington, Massachusetts (Northeast United States) and France.
Historical growth strategy

We don't have historical growth strategy information for this company yet.

Chart analysis

We don't have chart analysis for this company yet.

Competitors

We don't have competitor information for this company yet.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.