valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

METLIFE INC (MET) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$85.00 ComplexityHigh Updated
$99.00 $169.00
bear $99.00 base $135.00 bull $169.00 margin of safety $85.00 market price* $100.76
MetLife is one of the world's largest life and benefits insurers. Its earnings come from Group Benefits (life, dental, disability and voluntary coverage sold through U.S. employers), Retirement and Income Solutions (pension risk transfer, structured settlements and institutional annuities), Asia (mainly Japan and Korea), Latin America (mainly Mexico and Chile), EMEA, and MetLife Investment Management, which on December 30, 2025 bought the asset manager PineBridge Investments for $885 million in cash. Almost all of its profit is the spread between what its roughly half-trillion-dollar bond, mortgage and private-credit portfolio earns and what it has promised policyholders, plus underwriting margin on group coverage. How we measured earnings. We start from net income, add back true non-cash items (depreciation, investment gains and losses, accrual-versus-cash timing on private-equity holdings) and subtract stock compensation. We do not count interest credited to policyholder accounts or the growth in reserves as owner cash, because that money belongs to policyholders, and we do not add back derivative losses, because the real cash cost of MetLife's hedging program shows up every year in its investing cash flows. Capital spending is not separately disclosed and is immaterial. On this basis MetLife earned between $1.8 billion (2021, distorted by private-equity marks that ran far ahead of cash) and $6.1 billion (2024) a year since the 2017 Brighthouse spin-off, with a median of about $4.9 billion across 2017-2025, which spans a rate cycle, the 2020 shutdown and the 2022 rate shock. Because MetLife has retired roughly 40% of its shares since 2017, that same $4.9 billion spread over today's roughly 647 million diluted shares is about $7.60 a share, which is our starting level. Preferred dividends of about $190 million a year rank ahead of the common and are deducted. In 2025 earnings on this basis were about $4.1 billion, down from $6.1 billion in 2024; the company's own segment reconciliation shows underlying segment earnings rose that year and the drop came from investment, derivative and hedge marks, so we treat 2025 as within the normal range rather than a new lower level. As an insurer, borrowing is part of the business, so we value earnings after interest and subtract no debt; leverage is charged in the bear case instead. Base case: the business earns about $4.9 billion in year one, then grows about 1.5% a year for a decade, roughly the pace at which group benefits premiums and fee-based asset management have grown alongside wages and employment, and then holds flat. We credit no further growth from pension risk transfer, where premium volume has risen sharply but segment earnings have been roughly flat for three years, and none from new markets or margin improvement. Buybacks are not counted as extra growth because they are paid for out of the same earnings we are already valuing. The business is worth about $135 a share; there is no separate debt subtraction for an insurer, so that is also the value to shareholders. Bear case: one full credit cycle of the kind life insurers went through in 2008-2010. In that episode MetLife's own investment losses and derivative and reserve charges wiped out most of two years of earnings and it sold new shares in late 2008 at depressed prices to shore up capital. We model year one at the normal level, then two years at 60% of normal as defaults in commercial mortgages and private credit (including office loans, a disclosed concentration) are realized, a third year at 80%, about 8% dilution from a capital raise at the trough, and a permanently lower level, 95% of normal through year ten and 90% thereafter, with no growth, reflecting continued pension risk transfer price competition and a widening drag from run-off businesses in Corporate & Other (its loss grew from about $295 million in 2023 to about $487 million in 2025). This case is worth about $99 a share. That is well above MetLife's tangible book value of roughly $22 a share, because book value is depressed by about $18 billion of unrealized losses on bonds the company intends to hold to maturity and because the employer benefits franchise, which kept writing business through 2009, is worth more than its capital in a downturn. Bull case: the business grows about 3% a year for a decade, closer to the combined 2023-2025 pace of group benefits, Japan and U.K. longevity reinsurance plus the newly acquired PineBridge fees, and then about 1% a year after that, supported by the employer distribution network that has persisted for decades. This case is worth about $169 a share. What changed since our previous analysis. The September 2026 analysis was built on a different basis that credited ongoing buybacks as additional per-share growth on top of the earnings that fund them; the previous figures are not comparable to these. On the business itself, first-half 2026 results show operating cash flow of $4.9 billion against $6.4 billion a year earlier, while net income rose to $1.9 billion from $1.7 billion, and the share count continued to fall to about 647 million; nothing in the half-year changes our view of the normal earnings level. Margin-of-safety price. We are moderately sure of the earnings level: nine years of results cluster between $4.1 billion and $6.1 billion outside one distorted year, and the group benefits business underneath is steady. The worst plausible event is a severe credit loss in the commercial real estate and private-credit book combined with a run on institutional funding agreements, which could force a capital raise at the bottom as in 2008; the business survived exactly that, but shareholders were diluted. Insurance regulators in each state and country also control how much cash the subsidiaries can send up to the parent, so payouts can be cut in a crisis. If we are wrong about the normal level (closer to $4.1 billion than $4.9 billion) and pension risk transfer keeps eroding, the shares would be worth roughly $110 on a base-style path and well under $90 in a credit cycle. The business pays about $2.40 a share a year in dividends plus buybacks of 4-5% of shares annually while waiting, roughly 7-8% a year at the margin-of-safety price, so the rest of a 20% annual return must come from the price closing toward value over a few years. From $85, the shares are worth about $135 on the median path and near $100 even through a 2008-style cycle; with the dividend and buyback yield and most of that gap closing over an assumed holding period of roughly three years, the base case implies about 20% a year, and the credit-cycle case implies a value still above that price. The margin-of-safety price is $85.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 $6.14 ▼
OE = NetIncome + non-cash addbacks − SBC − maintenance capex (derivatives excluded, see FY2017 note). Net income=$3,403M; D&A=$753M; amort=$(1,840)M; gains/losses investments=$1,144M; equity-method=$365M; other=$443M; sum=$865M; NI+non-cash=$4,268M; SBC=$131M; maintenance capex=$0; OE=$4,137M; diluted shares=673.3M; OE/sh=$6.14. Note: GAAP net income fell 23% YoY (2025 vs 2024) but MetLife's own disclosed segment reconciliation (10-K Note 2) shows total consolidated adjusted earnings actually rose from $5,996M to $6,137M in FY2025; the GAAP/adjusted-earnings gap is explained by named, dated items in that reconciliation (net investment losses, net derivative losses, smaller market-risk-benefit remeasurement gains, investment-hedge-adjustment costs), supporting the view that FY2025's decline in this OE series is substantially a mark-to-market/timing effect rather than core deterioration. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001099219-26-000013.
2024 $8.60 ▼
OE = NetIncome + non-cash addbacks − SBC − maintenance capex (derivatives excluded, see FY2017 note). Net income=$4,444M; D&A=$714M; amort=$(1,512)M; gains/losses investments=$1,165M; equity-method=$844M; other=$628M; sum=$1,839M; NI+non-cash=$6,283M; SBC=$168M; maintenance capex=$0; OE=$6,115M; diluted shares=711.1M; OE/sh=$8.60. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001099219-26-000013, comparative column for FY2024.
2023 $6.43 ▼
OE = NetIncome + non-cash addbacks − SBC − maintenance capex (derivatives excluded, see FY2017 note). Net income=$1,602M; D&A=$718M; amort=$(1,332)M; gains/losses investments=$2,800M; equity-method=$1,090M; other=$197M; sum=$3,473M; NI+non-cash=$5,075M; SBC=$171M; maintenance capex=$0; OE=$4,904M; diluted shares=762.3M; OE/sh=$6.43. Source: FY2025 10-K (filed 2026-02-19), accession 0001099219-26-000013, comparative column for FY2023.
2022 $5.07 ▼
OE = NetIncome + non-cash addbacks − SBC − maintenance capex (derivatives excluded, see FY2017 note). Net income=$2,558M; D&A=$673M; amort=$(960)M; gains/losses investments=$1,262M; equity-method=$505M; other=$245M; sum=$1,725M; NI+non-cash=$4,283M; SBC=$184M; maintenance capex=$0; OE=$4,099M; diluted shares=808.9M; OE/sh=$5.07. Source: FY2022 10-K, accession 0001099219-23-000045.
2021 $2.07 ▼
OE = NetIncome + non-cash addbacks − SBC − maintenance capex (derivatives excluded, see FY2017 note). Net income=$6,575M; D&A=$694M; amort=$(855)M; gains/losses investments=$(1,529)M; equity-method income net of dividends=$(3,051)M (unusually large: FY2021 alternative-investment/PE portfolio marks rose far faster than cash distributions received, an extraordinary year for equity-method accruals); other=$138M; sum non-cash=$(4,603)M; NI+non-cash=$1,972M; SBC=$173M; maintenance capex=$0; OE=$1,799M; diluted shares=869.4M; OE/sh=$2.07. Flagged as a low outlier year distorted by the equity-method accrual/cash timing gap; median anchor selection is robust to this outlier. Source: FY2022 10-K, accession 0001099219-23-000045, comparative column for FY2021.
2020 $6.17 ▼
CORRECTED on re-analysis 2026-09-20: the prior version of this record used 'other, net'=$184M for FY2020, sourced to the FY2022 10-K (accession 0001099219-23-000045) comparative column. Re-checking that exact filing, the FY2020 column of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows shows 'Other, net' = $351M (2022=$245M, 2021=$138M, 2020=$351M) — $184M was actually the FY2017 figure from a different filing, apparently miscopied. This is a sourcing/transcription error, corrected here per project methodology §2.4. OE = NetIncome + non-cash addbacks − SBC − maintenance capex (derivatives excluded from the addback — see FY2017 note — because the cash cost of hedging settles through investing activities, not operating). Net income=$5,418M; D&A=$619M; amortization of premium/discount=$(816)M; gains/losses on investments=$110M; equity-method income net of dividends=$76M; other, net=$351M (corrected); sum non-cash=$340M; NI+non-cash=$5,758M; SBC (AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense)=$127M; maintenance capex=$0 (no separate PP&E/software capex line; immaterial); OE=$5,631M; diluted shares=913.2M; OE/sh=$6.17 (was $5.98). Source: FY2022 10-K (filed 2023-02-23), accession 0001099219-23-000045, comparative column for FY2020.
2019 $5.81 ▼
OE = NetIncome + non-cash addbacks − SBC − maintenance capex (derivatives excluded, see FY2017 note). Net income=$5,909M; D&A=$630M; amort=$(999)M; gains/losses investments=$(444)M; equity-method=$254M; other=$285M; sum=$(274)M; NI+non-cash=$5,635M; SBC=$150M; maintenance capex=$0; OE=$5,485M; diluted shares=944.4M; OE/sh=$5.81. Source: FY2019 10-K, accession 0001099219-20-000064.
2018 $5.07 ▼
OE = NetIncome + non-cash addbacks (D&A, investment amortization, gains/losses on investments, equity-method income net of dividends, other) − SBC − maintenance capex (derivatives excluded from addback, see FY2017 note). Net income=$5,128M; D&A=$628M; amort=$(1,013)M; gains/losses investments=$298M; equity-method=$251M; other=$(62)M; sum=$102M; NI+non-cash=$5,230M; SBC=$86M; maintenance capex=$0; OE=$5,144M; diluted shares=1,013.9M; OE/sh=$5.07. Source: FY2019 10-K, accession 0001099219-20-000064, comparative column for FY2018.
2017 $4.07 ▼
OE = NetIncome + true non-cash addbacks (D&A, investment premium/discount amortization, gains/losses on investments, equity-method income net of dividends, other) − SBC − maintenance capex. Net income=$4,020M; D&A=$795M; amort of premium/discount=$(1,044)M; gains/losses on investments=$363M; equity-method income net of dividends=$194M; other, net=$184M; sum non-cash=$492M; NI+non-cash=$4,512M; SBC (AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense)=$128M; maintenance capex=$0 (MetLife discloses no separate PP&E/software capex line in investing activities; physical capex is immaterial for this business and not broken out); OE=$4,384M; diluted shares=1,078.5M; OE/sh=$4.07. Judgment: (Gains) losses on derivatives, net was excluded from the non-cash addback (left in the excluded/working-capital-like bucket) because MetLife's realized derivative settlement cash flows run through investing activities as a recurring net cash cost of hedging policyholder guarantees, not a one-time non-cash mark; adding it back would overstate sustainable cash earnings. Source: FY2019 10-K (filed 2020-02-21), accession 0001099219-20-000064, comparative column for FY2017.
2016 $0.85 ▼
OE = CFO − working-capital/policyholder-liability movement − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities)=$14,774M. Retained as true non-cash charges (kept in CFO): D&A=$652M; amortization of premium/accretion of discount on investments=$(1,110)M; gains/losses on investments and sales of businesses, net=$(183)M; equity-method income net of dividends=$475M; goodwill impairment=$260M; other, net=$139M (sum=$233M); NI $854M + these = $1,087M. Excluded from the add-back (treated as working-capital-style movement, since each represents growth in an obligation to policyholders or a hedging cost settled in investing activities, not a sunk non-cash charge): interest credited to policyholder account balances=$6,282M; universal life and investment-type product policy fees=$(9,207)M; (gains) losses on derivatives, net=$8,779M (the cash cost of MetLife's hedging program settles through 'cash paid/received in connection with freestanding derivatives' in investing activities — a recurring net cash cost in 8 of the last 9 years — so this P&L reconciling item is not treated as a permanent non-cash addback); change in contractholder-directed securities=$111M; change in accrued investment income=$(31)M; change in premiums/reinsurance receivables=$(2,158)M; change in DAC/VOBA=$(937)M; change in income tax=$(1,522)M; change in other assets=$3,248M; change in insurance-related liabilities and policy-related balances=$6,321M; change in other liabilities=$2,801M. CFO minus all excluded items = $1,087M (ties to NI+retained non-cash, confirming the reconciliation). SBC (AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense)=$147M (restated figure per FY2017/FY2018 10-K comparative columns, superseding $160M as originally filed in the FY2016 10-K itself — latest restated figure used per methodology). Maintenance capex=$0 (MetLife discloses no separate PP&E/software capex line in investing activities; immaterial for this business, consistent with all other years in this series). OE = $1,087M − $147M = $940M. Diluted shares=1,108.5M. OE/sh=$0.85. Note: FY2016 predates the August 2017 Brighthouse Financial separation (goodwill impairment and separation-related noise present) and describes a different business mix than MetLife today; retained here for the historical record but excluded from the anchor window used in valuation. This is the same methodology used for the existing FY2017-FY2025 records in this table (verified by independently reconciling each of those years to the filings; all matched except FY2020, corrected separately). Source: FY2018 10-K (filed 2019-02-22), accession 0001099219-19-000008, comparative column for FY2016; SBC restated figure per FY2019 10-K, accession 0001099219-20-000064, and FY2018 10-K, accession 0001099219-19-000008.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
United States (all regions, Northeast, Midwest, South and West, through employer group benefits and pension risk transfer), Japan, South Korea, Australia, Mexico, Chile, Brazil, United Kingdom, and other countries in Europe, the Middle East and Asia
Historical growth strategy
Grows mainly by selling group benefits and retirement products through employers and pension plans, expanding internationally in Japan and Latin America, and periodically reshaping the portfolio by acquisition (Alico 2010, PineBridge Investments 2025) and divestiture (Brighthouse Financial spin-off 2017), while steadily shrinking its share count through large buybacks.
Chart analysis
A chartist would describe MetLife as a long, choppy recovery: the shares collapsed in the 2008-2009 financial crisis and again in the 2020 shutdown, spent much of the 2010s range-bound, then broke out to new post-crisis highs in 2021-2024 and have since been consolidating in a broad sideways range rather than trending. Sharp sell-offs have tended to coincide with credit scares and falling interest rates, and the stock behaves as a high-beta financial that tracks bank and credit sentiment more than its own steady earnings.
Competitors

Companies we consider competitors of MET. Tap a ticker to open our analysis of that company in a new tab.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.