valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

Usio, Inc. (USIO) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$0.19 Updated
-$0.34 $1.70
bear -$0.34 base $0.38 bull $1.70 margin of safety $0.19 market price* $2.82
Business condition attached to the margin of safety Owner earnings (cash profit after routine reinvestment) turning positive and staying positive for at least 3-4 consecutive quarters, evidencing that 2026 cost relief (from the settled lawsuit) and payment-facilitation/prepaid card growth are producing durable per-share profit rather than a one-quarter blip.
Usio is a small electronic payments company that helps merchants and businesses accept and process payments: credit and debit card processing, ACH (bank-to-bank) transactions, a payment-facilitation platform ("PayFac-in-a-Box") that lets software partners embed payments quickly, a prepaid/reloadable card program business, and a legacy print-and-mail bill-presentment operation (Output Solutions). Revenue has grown from about $12 million in 2016 to roughly $85 million in 2025, driven mainly by the payment-facilitation and prepaid card lines, with the older ACH and print/mail businesses growing more slowly or shrinking. The difficulty with Usio is that this growth has not yet translated into real, durable profit. Looking at owner earnings (cash profit after routine reinvestment) over the last five years — the period since the business reached roughly its current scale and mix — the results bounce between small gains and real losses: a modest profit in 2021 and 2023, losses in 2020, 2022 and 2025. 2024's reported net income looked strong, but roughly $4.7 million of it came from two items that will not repeat: a release of a tax-related accounting reserve and a one-time pandemic-era employee tax credit. Stripping those out, 2024 was also roughly breakeven. The typical (median) year over this stretch is essentially break-even to slightly negative on a per-share basis. That is the starting point for this valuation, not the better-looking headline net income figure. 2025 itself was weaker than 2024, mainly because of higher overhead spending (SG&A) and the loss of that one-time tax credit. Some of that overhead was tied to an inherited lawsuit (a dispute over customer deposits from a 2021 acquisition) that ran through an appeals process costing the company legal fees and requiring a bonding facility; that dispute was finally settled in February 2026 for a modest amount, which should relieve some cost pressure going forward. Because that relief is real but small, our base case assumes only a partial, not a full, rebound in near-term profitability — we are not assuming the recent decline reverses just because a settlement was reached. Three cases, reflecting the spread of plausible outcomes for this business specifically (not a guess about markets in general): - Bear case: overhead growth continues to outpace revenue, competitive pressure in payment processing compresses pricing, and the company continues relying on issuing new shares to fund itself (share count has already roughly quadrupled since 2016). Owner earnings stay modestly negative per share for the next decade. Because losses this small don't have a natural floor other than zero, and continued share issuance keeps diluting existing holders, this case values the shares at roughly negative $0.34 — in effect, a scenario where a holder should expect to be diluted away faster than the business creates value. Usio carries very little debt, so this is a story about dilution and persistent unprofitability, not balance-sheet leverage. - Base case: the payment-facilitation and prepaid card lines keep growing at a modest pace, overhead growth slows from 2025's elevated rate, and the settled lawsuit's cost relief helps at the margin. Owner earnings stay slightly negative in the next year or two, then gradually turn modestly positive around the middle of the next decade. On this path, the shares are worth around $0.38 today. It is worth being direct that most of this value depends on the business sustaining a modest per-share profit beyond the next ten years — something it has not yet done for any sustained stretch in its history — rather than on near-term results, which stay weak or negative through most of the explicit forecast. - Bull case: the payment-facilitation platform wins share faster from smaller processors, overhead discipline improves markedly, and the settlement removes a real cost drag. Owner earnings turn positive within a year or two and reach a meaningfully better, though still modest, level within a decade. This case is worth roughly $1.70 per share, and here too, a large share of the value rests on the business holding a sustained modest profit margin over the long run rather than the nearer-term numbers. Given how thin and inconsistent actual profitability has been, and how much of the base and bull cases depend on a level of sustained profitability not yet demonstrated, the margin-of-safety price is set at a large discount to the base-case estimate: roughly $0.19 per share. Because the case values above are so close to break-even, that price also assumes owner earnings turn and stay positive for several consecutive quarters — concrete evidence that the 2026 cost relief and payment-facilitation growth are showing up in durable per-share profit.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 -$0.07 ▼
OE = NI + D&A + minor deferred tax adj − maintenance capex. NI=$(2,512,339); D&A=$1,946,224; deferred tax expense (small, non-adjusting) =$54,212; capex=$1,537,382; revenue grew $2.46M YoY, capex_ratio 2.00% so growth capex=$49,236, maintenance capex=$1,488,146; OE = -2,512,339+1,946,224+54,212-1,488,146 = $(2,000,049); diluted shares=26,926,838; OE/sh=$(0.0743). Company attributes the decline from FY2024 to higher SG&A and the absence of the one-time items present in 2024 (see FY2024 row). Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001437749-26-008833.
2024 -$0.01 ▼
OE = NI + D&A − maintenance capex, with two one-time items in NI backed out: (1) a $3,076,440 non-cash deferred-tax benefit from releasing a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, and (2) a $1,700,000 one-time Employee Retention Tax Credit (CARES Act) recorded as an SG&A offset in 2024 and explicitly stated by the company as not recurring in 2025. NI=$3,305,497; D&A=$2,263,302; capex=$991,881 (latest restated, per FY2025 10-K comparative — the FY2024 10-K originally reported $1,787,885 total capex for the year, later restated down); revenue declined $1.13M YoY so growth capex=$0, maintenance capex=capex=$991,881. Adjusted OE = 3,305,497+2,263,302-3,076,440-1,700,000-991,881 = $(199,522); diluted shares=26,852,129; OE/sh=$(0.0074). Unadjusted (as-reported) OE/sh would be $0.0559 — the adjustment is made because both one-time items are explicitly disclosed as non-recurring in the FY2025 10-K MD&A and would otherwise overstate sustainable owner earnings. Sources: FY2024 10-K, accession 0001437749-25-009368; one-time items and capex restatement per FY2025 10-K, accession 0001437749-26-008833.
2023 $0.02 ▼
OE = NI + D&A − maintenance capex, using latest restated figures (revenue, capex and diluted shares were each revised in the FY2024 10-K comparative column vs the original FY2023 10-K). NI=$(475,104); D&A=$2,081,533; capex=$1,469,535; revenue (restated) $84,066,245, grew $14.64M YoY, capex_ratio 2.00% so growth capex=$292,759, maintenance capex=$1,176,776; OE=$429,653; diluted shares (restated)=26,490,868; OE/sh=$0.0162. Reported CFO of $3.5M (restated) vs $14.9M (as originally filed) reflects the company's reclassification of customer-fund settlement/prepaid-card balance movements from operating to financing activities beginning with the FY2024 10-K; CFO is not used directly here. Sources: FY2023 10-K, accession 0001437749-24-009583; restated comparatives per FY2024 10-K, accession 0001437749-25-009368.
2022 -$0.20 ▼
OE = NI + D&A − maintenance capex. NI=$(5,483,244); D&A=$2,735,118; capex=$1,396,488; revenue grew $7.49M YoY, capex_ratio 2.00% so growth capex=$149,719, maintenance capex=$1,246,769; OE=$(3,994,895); diluted shares=20,379,386; OE/sh=$(0.1960). As with 2021, reported CFO of $(17.0)M this year reflects the same since-reclassified customer-fund swing and is not used. Source: FY2022 10-K, accession 0001437749-23-005794.
2021 $0.05 ▼
OE = NI + D&A − maintenance capex. NI=$(321,634); D&A=$2,643,675; capex=$2,008,852; revenue grew $29.69M YoY (pandemic-era ACH/bill-pay surge), capex_ratio 2.00% so growth capex=$593,810, maintenance capex=$1,415,042; OE=$906,999; diluted shares=20,028,850; OE/sh=$0.0453. Reported CFO of $29.8M this year is not used directly — it includes a large swing in settlement/prepaid-card customer-fund balances that the company later (FY2024 10-K) reclassified out of operating cash flow; the NI+D&A identity is unaffected by that balance-sheet-only swing. Source: FY2021 10-K, accession 0001437749-22-006589.
2020 -$0.19 ▼
OE = NI + D&A − maintenance capex. NI=$(2,906,183); D&A=$1,518,214; capex=$1,615,317; revenue grew $4.05M YoY, capex_ratio 2.00% so growth capex=$81,026, maintenance capex=$1,534,291; OE=$(2,922,260); diluted shares=15,428,798; OE/sh=$(0.1894). Source: FY2020 10-K, accession 0001437749-21-007524.
2019 -$0.32 ▼
OE = NI + D&A − maintenance capex. NI=$(5,115,747); D&A=$2,022,520; capex=$1,166,168; revenue grew $3.18M YoY, capex_ratio 2.00% so growth capex=$63,528, maintenance capex=$1,102,640; OE=$(4,195,867); diluted shares=12,958,067; OE/sh=$(0.3238). Source: FY2019 10-K, accession 0001088034-20-000003.
2018 -$0.22 ▼
OE = NI + D&A − maintenance capex. NI=$(3,775,815); D&A=$1,875,638; capex=$982,402; revenue grew $10.45M YoY, capex_ratio 2.00% so growth capex=$209,059, maintenance capex=$773,343; OE=$(2,673,520); diluted shares=12,128,816; OE/sh=$(0.2204). Source: FY2018 10-K, accession 0001088034-19-000010.
2017 -$0.26 ▼
OE = NI + D&A − maintenance capex. NI=$(3,008,785); D&A=$1,258,132; capex=$640,206; capex_ratio 2.00% (mean capex/revenue, 2021-2025 window used for all years); revenue grew $2.49M YoY so growth capex=$49,896, maintenance capex=$590,310; OE=$(2,340,963); diluted shares=8,995,883; OE/sh=$(0.2603). Source: FY2017 10-K, accession 0001088034-18-000004.
2016 -$0.07 ▼
OE = NI + D&A − maintenance capex (CFO-based ΔWC removal is algebraically identical to this identity). NI=$(1,196,642); D&A=$901,600; capex=$292,088; revenue declined YoY (2016 rev $12.08M vs 2015 $14.38M) so growth capex=$0, maintenance capex=capex=$292,088; OE=$(587,130); diluted shares=7,838,197; OE/sh=$(0.0749). Source: FY2016 10-K, accession 0001171843-17-002017.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography

We don't have sales geography information for this company yet.

Historical growth strategy

We don't have historical growth strategy information for this company yet.

Chart analysis

We don't have chart analysis for this company yet.

Competitors

We don't have competitor information for this company yet.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.