valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$74.93 Updated
$51.61 $178.72
bear $51.61 base $129.38 bull $178.72 margin of safety $74.93 market price* $203.80
NetApp sells enterprise data storage systems and related software and support, plus a smaller cloud storage business (Keystone and public-cloud offerings, about 10% of revenue). Its core products are all-flash storage arrays (the AFF and newer ASA lines) sold mostly through channel partners, backed by a large, sticky base of paid support and maintenance contracts. Demand today is increasingly tied to enterprise adoption of AI, since training and serving AI models requires fast, well-managed storage for unstructured data, alongside ordinary hardware refresh cycles. We measure the business by its owner earnings — cash generated from operations after stripping out swings in working capital and stock-based compensation, and after setting aside only the capital spending needed to keep the existing business running (not the extra spending tied to growth). Owner earnings ran $3.00-$3.40 per share through the FY2021-2023 upcycle (component cost inflation and post-pandemic demand), before stepping up to $5.50, $5.79 and $7.56 in fiscal 2024, 2025 and 2026 as the all-flash and support/subscription mix lifted margins and continued buybacks (NetApp has cut its share count from 226 million to about 201 million over that span). We anchor value on the median of this most recent six-year window (fiscal 2021-2026), about $4.45 per share, rather than the most recent, elevated year, since fiscal 2026's 31% owner-earnings growth was driven mainly by margin and working-capital timing rather than the 5% revenue growth the business actually posted, and is unlikely to repeat at that pace. Our base case assumes NetApp keeps growing revenue in the mid-single digits as all-flash upgrade cycles and AI-related demand continue, with owner earnings growing 8% in year one, decelerating to roughly 4% a year by the back half of the decade as the margin-mix benefits mature and hyperscaler and commodity-storage competition intensify. Beyond ten years we assume the highly recurring, high-margin support and subscription base continues to largely renew itself, supporting a very modest (under 1%) continuing growth rate; that assumption about the years beyond year ten accounts for roughly two-thirds of the estimated value, so it deserves scrutiny — it rests on NetApp's support-contract renewal economics persisting, not on new product breakthroughs. On this path we estimate the shares are worth about $129 today. Our bear case assumes hyperscalers and lower-cost storage competitors erode NetApp's pricing and share in its core on-premises business, compressing margins and reversing some of the recent working-capital tailwinds, with owner earnings falling about 10% in year one and a further 5-8% over the following two years before stabilizing at a permanently smaller, more commoditized level (roughly 30% below today's run-rate). NetApp carries about $2.5 billion of debt against roughly $3.6 billion of cash and investments — not alarming today, but it would add pressure in this scenario. That case values the shares at about $52. Our bull case assumes AI-driven demand for high-performance storage meaningfully accelerates all-flash and cloud-storage sales beyond current trends, with continued margin gains and buybacks; owner earnings grow 20% in year one, tapering to a mid-single-digit pace by year ten. That case is worth about $179 per share. Given the spread between our bear and base cases, the margin-of-safety price is around $75, set to compensate for the real risk that on-premises storage economics erode faster than we expect. We did not find anything in the filings we could not reconcile.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2026 $7.56 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$2,067M; ΔWC=$(23)M; SBC=$382M; capex=$198M, growth capex=$10M, maintenance capex=$188M; OE=$1,520M; diluted shares=201M; OE/sh=$7.56. capex_ratio (10-yr mean of capex/revenue, FY17-FY26)=2.88%, used for growth-capex splits across all years. Reconciliation check (NI+D&A+non-cash items+ΔWC=CFO) verified exactly for FY17-FY26 using each year's own 10-K cash-flow statement. Source: FY2026 10-K, accession 0001193125-26-259683.
2025 $5.79 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$1,506M; ΔWC=$(250)M; SBC=$386M; capex=$168M, growth capex=$9M, maintenance capex=$159M; OE=$1,211M; diluted shares=209M; OE/sh=$5.79. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0000950170-25-083705.
2024 $5.50 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$1,685M; ΔWC=$2M; SBC=$357M; capex=$155M, revenue declined vs FY23 so growth capex=$0, maintenance capex=$155M; OE=$1,171M; diluted shares=213M; OE/sh=$5.50. Source: FY2024 10-K, accession 0000950170-24-071327.
2023 $3.01 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$1,107M; ΔWC=$(106)M; SBC=$312M; capex=$239M, growth capex=$1M, maintenance capex=$238M; OE=$663M; diluted shares=220M; OE/sh=$3.01. Source: FY2023 10-K, accession 0000950170-23-027948.
2022 $3.40 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$1,211M; ΔWC=$(22)M; SBC=$245M; capex=$226M, growth capex=$17M, maintenance capex=$209M; OE=$779M; diluted shares=229M; OE/sh=$3.40. Source: FY2022 10-K, accession 0000950170-22-011708.
2021 $3.09 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$1,333M; ΔWC=$285M (incl. a $371M sale-leaseback of properties reflected via a non-cash gain reconciling item, and a working-capital build); SBC=$197M; capex=$162M, growth capex=$10M, maintenance capex=$152M; OE=$699M; diluted shares=226M; OE/sh=$3.09. Source: FY2021 10-K, accession 0001564590-21-033645.
2020 $3.80 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$1,060M; ΔWC=$(102)M; SBC=$153M; capex=$124M, revenue declined vs FY19 so growth capex=$0, maintenance capex=$124M; OE=$885M; diluted shares=233M; OE/sh=$3.80. Source: FY2020 10-K, accession 0001564590-20-029349.
2019 $4.35 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$1,341M; ΔWC=$(109)M; SBC=$158M; capex=$173M, growth capex=$7M, maintenance capex=$166M; OE=$1,126M; diluted shares=259M; OE/sh=$4.35. Source: FY2019 10-K, accession 0001564590-19-022779.
2018 $0.75 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$1,478M; ΔWC=$978M (dominated by a one-time $714M increase in long-term taxes payable from the TCJA transition tax, which the formula correctly strips out as a non-recurring WC-type swing); SBC=$161M; capex=$145M, growth capex=$12M (capex_ratio 2.88%×revenue growth), maintenance capex=$133M; OE=$206M; diluted shares=276M; OE/sh=$0.75. Note: this is an anomalous low year driven by the TCJA one-off, excluded from the anchor window. Source: FY2018 10-K, accession 0001564590-18-015820.
2017 $2.26 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$986M; ΔWC(changes in assets/liabilities per CF stmt)=$(18)M; SBC=$195M; capex=$175M, capex_ratio=2.88% of revenue (10-yr mean), revenue declined vs FY16 so growth capex=$0, maintenance capex=$175M; OE=$634M; diluted shares=281M; OE/sh=$2.26. Source: FY2017 10-K, accession 0001564590-17-012758.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography

We don't have sales geography information for this company yet.

Historical growth strategy

We don't have historical growth strategy information for this company yet.

Chart analysis

We don't have chart analysis for this company yet.

Competitors

We don't have competitor information for this company yet.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.