valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

MAXIMUS, INC. (MMS) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$60.00 ComplexityAverage Updated
$45.02 $148.51
bear $45.02 base $96.53 bull $148.51 margin of safety $60.00 market price* $61.47
Business condition attached to the margin of safety Maximus announces that it has been awarded the successor VA medical disability examination (MDE) contracts (new base period expected to begin around mid-2027) covering all the regions it serves today, and its first quarterly report after the award does not lower guidance or disclose lower pricing, lower volume share or weaker incentive terms on the new contracts.
Maximus runs the administrative machinery of large government programs under contract. About 55% of revenue comes from U.S. federal agencies. The largest profit engine there is the Department of Veterans Affairs medical disability exam (MDE) program, run through the VES subsidiary bought in 2021. About a third of revenue comes from U.S. state governments, chiefly Medicaid and CHIP enrollment and eligibility work. The rest comes from the United Kingdom and Canada, following the fiscal 2025 sale of the Australia and Korea businesses. How we measured earnings. We start from the cash the business generates for owners: operating cash flow, stripped of working-capital swings, less stock compensation and the capital spending needed to keep the business running. The company carries meaningful debt, so we add back the $80-90 million of interest it pays each year. That gives the cash the business itself produces before its lenders are paid; we value that and subtract the debt at the end. On that basis the business produced about $331 million in fiscal 2022, $311 million in 2023, $372 million in 2024 and $500 million in 2025. We anchor on the average of fiscal 2024 and 2025, about $436 million a year, or roughly $8.22 per share on today's 53.1 million diluted shares. Fiscal 2022 and 2023 are left out. In those years the business was still integrating VES, losing its pandemic work and absorbing higher labor costs during the Medicaid eligibility-review ramp. The VA incentive pause, and what it is actually worth. From July 1 through December 31, 2026, the VA has paused both the performance incentives and the penalties on its MDE contracts for every vendor while it reworks how exam quality is reviewed and validated. Maximus says these incentives were worth about $0.35 per share in each of the first three quarters of fiscal 2026, about $74 million a year after tax. Management also says they were a bigger contributor in 2026 than in earlier years. So the 2024-2025 earnings we anchor on contain much less incentive income than 2026 did. As a cross-check, we took the company's reported adjusted earnings for the first three quarters of fiscal 2026 and stripped out the incentive amount the company itself quantified. That leaves earning power of about $446 million a year before interest, slightly above our anchor. Operating cash flow cannot confirm this for 2026 because of the receivables build described below, so it is used only as a check, not to set the level. The conclusion matters: losing the incentives by themselves would not pull the business much below our anchor. The company does not disclose how much incentive income 2024 and 2025 contained. Even if we strip about $20 million a year from the anchor to allow for it, the central value falls only about $5 per share, to about $92. The real risk is broader: what the VA does with pricing and volume when the MDE contracts are rebid. The rebid. The current MDE contracts run through December 31, 2026, and the company expects an extension of up to six months. The VA's draft work statement, released in August 2026, covers all six regions Maximus serves today, with the scope of work unchanged, and envisions a new base contract starting around mid-2027. It does not disclose pricing or incentive terms. The domestic regions are a multi-vendor arrangement: in January 2025 the VA placed four providers on the regional contracts, Maximus's VES, Leidos's QTC, Optum and Loyal Source. Exam volume can therefore shift between vendors as well as be repriced. Cash and receivables. Operating cash flow was negative $180 million over the first nine months of fiscal 2026 because one large federal customer slowed payments, and receivables rose to $1.38 billion (about 98 days of sales). The same nine-month pattern occurred in fiscal 2025, when cash flow was negative $220 million at nine months and $429 million for the full year. About $245 million had been collected by early August, so we treat this as timing, not lost earnings. Growth check. Business cash flow grew 34% in fiscal 2025. Our central case starts fiscal 2027 about 2% below the anchor because the pause runs into its first quarter. The debt. Maximus owes about $1.65 billion of floating-rate bank debt: a term loan maturing May 2029, a term loan maturing May 2031, and a $750 million revolver. Covenants cap net leverage at 4.0 times EBITDA and require interest coverage of at least 3.0 times; the company reports net leverage of about 2.0 times. After crediting the $245 million of delayed receivables already collected, we subtract about $1.405 billion, or $26.48 per share. The roughly $57 million of cash on hand is treated as needed to run the business. The loans cost close to 6% today, so no rate adjustment is made. Central case: Maximus keeps its MDE regions in the rebid on economics similar to those already built into our anchor. The business holds about $455 million a year from fiscal 2028, which includes about $20 million a year from the federal law signed in July 2025. That law starts Medicaid work requirements and twice-yearly eligibility checks for the expansion population on January 1, 2027. A court has declined to halt it, and Maximus says some existing state contracts have already been cleared to ramp up. No other growth is credited: the $50 billion sales pipeline, new AI tools and federal modernization work are hopes, not contracts. The trailing book-to-bill is only 0.5. That is partly offset by $1.35 billion of contracts awarded but not yet signed, mostly renewals, so flat is the honest median. We hold that level for 30 years, based on the company's long record of renewing government administration contracts, then fade it to zero over the following decade. The business is worth about $6.53 billion; less $1.405 billion of debt leaves $5.12 billion, about $96.53 per share. Weak case: the rebid goes badly. The successor MDE contracts carry no incentive economics, and VES loses exam volume or pricing to the three other approved vendors. We size this at about $74 million a year after tax below the anchor. That uses the incentive amount as a measure of how much program profit the VA has shown it can switch off. The low book-to-bill turns into steady attrition of 2% a year for a decade and 3% a year after that, the Medicaid rules are delayed by state exemptions or handled by others, and the story ends after 25 years. Even at its low point this case earns about $191 million a year, more than twice its interest bill. The business is worth about $3.79 billion; less $1.405 billion of debt leaves $2.39 billion, about $45.02 per share. Strong case: incentives resume in January 2027 as the contract change states, the successor contracts keep them, and Maximus keeps all six regions. The business returns to its demonstrated fiscal 2026 earning power with incentives, about $520 million a year, plus about $40 million a year from the Medicaid changes, and holds it indefinitely. The business is worth about $9.29 billion; less $1.405 billion of debt leaves $7.88 billion, about $148.51 per share. Margin-of-safety price and the condition attached to it. Most of the distance between the weak and central cases comes from one event: the MDE rebid outcome, expected around mid-2027. Without knowing it, the shares would need to trade in the mid-$40s for a 20% return to be reasonably supported, because the weak case alone would eliminate any margin above that. Once Maximus confirms it has won the successor contracts in its current regions without a cut to its outlook, the worst evidenced outcome becomes ordinary attrition elsewhere in the business. That outcome is worth about $60 per share (a $4.57 billion business less $1.405 billion of debt). The margin-of-safety price is $60 once that is true. At that price the worst case implies roughly break-even plus a 2.5% dividend, and the central value of about $97 implies a 20% annual return if the market recognizes it within about three years. Accounting notes. About $80-90 million a year of amortization on acquired contracts (mainly VES and the General Dynamics health unit bought in 2019) is added back as a non-cash cost. Those acquired contracts are short and rebid often, so their decay is carried in the flat central path and the eroding weak case, not ignored. Fiscal 2025 cash flow includes the add-back of a roughly $40 million non-cash loss on the Australia/Korea sale. That loss reduced reported profit but used no cash, so adding it back does not inflate cash earnings. Litigation over the 2023 MOVEit file-transfer breach is still pending, and no loss is assumed. What changed. Our previous analysis (September 28, 2026: $47.25 / $96.57 / $142.01, margin-of-safety price $62) described the weak case as the permanent loss of the VA incentives. On closer review, our earnings anchor carries only a small part of the incentive income Maximus earned in 2026. Losing the incentives alone is therefore a modest hit; the weak case is really about the rebid going badly on volume and pricing, and we now describe it that way. The strong case rises because fiscal 2026 showed what the business earns with full incentives. The bigger change is the margin-of-safety price. $62 sat well above the weak case with nothing to show which way the rebid will go. We now tie the margin-of-safety price to the rebid outcome and set it at $60, the level that still works if everything else disappoints. What would make this wrong: losing MDE regions or volume share, or harsher pricing, in the rebid; federal payment delays that turn out to be something other than timing; or state Medicaid work proving smaller than even our modest assumption.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 $7.20 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$429,372K. ΔWC=-$90,175K. SBC=$41,182K. Capex=$63,213K; revenue $5,306,197K->$5,431,276K, Δrev=$125,079K, growth capex=$1,782K, maintenance capex=$61,431K. OE=429,372+90,175-41,182-61,431=$416,934K; diluted shares=57,921K; OE/sh=$7.198. Judgment call: CFO includes a one-time non-cash 'divestiture-related charges' add-back of $39,549K (accumulated FX-translation losses released on the FY2025 sale of the Australia/Korea businesses); excluding it, OE≈$377,385K (OE/sh≈$6.52). Management states FY2025 U.S. Services results 'returned to a steady state' after the FY2024 redetermination-unwind bump. This one-off year does not change the FY2020-FY2025 median (3rd/4th-ranked values are unaffected either way), so it was not specially adjusted. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001032220-25-000053.
2024 $4.76 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$515,258K, boosted by peak Medicaid-redetermination-unwind volume (temporary, per management: 'FY2024 results received the benefit of higher volumes as Medicaid redetermination activities continued'). ΔWC=+$78,938K. SBC=$35,349K. Capex=$114,190K (highest of the window); revenue $4,904,728K->$5,306,197K, Δrev=$401,469K, growth capex=$5,721K, maintenance capex=$108,469K. OE=515,258-78,938-35,349-108,469=$292,502K; diluted shares=61,484K; OE/sh=$4.7576. Source: FY2024 10-K, accession 0001032220-24-000094.
2023 $3.74 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$314,340K; this is the lowest owner-earnings year in the post-acquisition window, reflecting labor-cost/margin pressure while ramping to handle Medicaid redetermination-unwind volume. ΔWC=-$31,562K. SBC=$29,522K. Capex=$90,695K; revenue $4,631,018K->$4,904,728K, Δrev=$273,710K, growth capex=$3,901K, maintenance capex=$86,794K. OE=314,340+31,562-29,522-86,794=$229,586K; diluted shares=61,450K; OE/sh=$3.7364. Source: FY2023 10-K, accession 0001032220-23-000096.
2022 $4.65 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$289,839K (down from FY2021 as COVID-era contract work receded and working capital normalized). ΔWC=-$79,430K. SBC=$30,476K. Capex=$56,145K; revenue $4,254,485K->$4,631,018K, Δrev=$376,533K, growth capex=$5,366K, maintenance capex=$50,779K. OE=289,839+79,430-30,476-50,779=$288,014K; diluted shares=61,969K; OE/sh=$4.6474. Source: FY2022 10-K, accession 0001032220-22-000074.
2021 $5.76 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$517,322K (elevated by COVID-era unemployment-insurance and pandemic-response contract work). ΔWC=+$104,053K (large positive swing, incl. deferred revenue +$53,652K and AR +$38,578K, consistent with contract ramp-up advances). SBC=$28,554K. Capex=$36,565K; revenue $3,461,537K->$4,254,485K, Δrev=$792,948K, growth capex=$11,300K, maintenance capex=$25,265K. OE=517,322-104,053-28,554-25,265=$359,450K; diluted shares=62,365K; OE/sh=$5.7639. This year is the COVID-contract peak; included as one of six years in the post-acquisition anchor window but not itself the anchor (median is used). Source: FY2021 10-K, accession 0001628280-21-023790.
2020 $4.13 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$244,592K. ΔWC=-$72,923K (largest component: AR increase of $180,747K, partly offset by AP&accrued +$79,930K). SBC=$23,708K. Capex=$40,707K; revenue $2,886,815K(FY2019, first full year incl. GDIT)->$3,461,537K(FY2020), Δrev=$574,722K (includes early COVID-19 unemployment-insurance/pandemic-response contract volume), growth capex=$8,190K, maintenance capex=$32,517K. OE=244,592+72,923-23,708-32,517=$261,290K; diluted shares=63,322K; OE/sh=$4.1266. Source: FY2020 10-K, accession 0001032220-20-000102.
2019 $4.30 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$356,727K. ΔWC=-$2,661K (AR billed+unbilled, prepaid, deferred contract costs, AP&accrued, accrued comp, deferred revenue, income taxes, other). SBC=$20,774K. Capex=$66,846K (includes stub-period integration spend for the General Dynamics IT Health & Human Services acquisition completed Sept 2019, $436,839K purchase price); capex_ratio=1.425% (mean FY2017-FY2025); revenue $2,392,236K(FY2018)->$2,886,815K(FY2019), Δrev=$494,579K, growth capex=$7,048K, maintenance capex=$59,798K. OE=356,727+2,661-20,774-59,798=$278,816K; diluted shares=64,820K; OE/sh=$4.3011. Note: FY2019 revenue/OE reflect only a ~1-month stub of the GDIT acquisition; FY2019 and earlier years are excluded from the anchor window because the acquisition materially transformed the business. Source: FY2019 10-K, accession 0001032220-19-000105.
2018 $3.99 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$316,774K (restated; FY2019 10-K comparative; original FY2018 10-K reported $323,525K). ΔWC=+$6,807K (AR billed+unbilled, prepaid, deferred contract costs, AP&accrued, accrued comp, deferred revenue, income taxes, other per CF-statement reconciliation). SBC=$20,238K. Capex=$26,520K; revenue declined $2,450,961K(FY2017)->$2,392,236K(FY2018), so growth capex=$0 and maintenance capex=capex=$26,520K. OE=316,774-6,807-20,238-26,520=$263,209K; diluted shares=65,932K; OE/sh=$3.9926. Source: FY2019 10-K, accession 0001032220-19-000105.
2017 $3.95 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$336,424K (restated; FY2019 10-K comparative). ΔWC (sum of AR billed+unbilled, prepaid, deferred contract costs, AP&accrued liabilities, accrued comp, deferred revenue, income taxes, other, exactly as itemized in the CF-statement reconciliation)=+$30,788K. SBC=$21,365K. Capex=$24,154K; capex_ratio=1.425% (mean capex/revenue FY2017-FY2025); revenue $2,403,360K(FY2016)->$2,450,961K(FY2017), Δrev=$47,601K, growth capex=$678K, maintenance capex=$23,476K. OE=336,424-30,788-21,365-23,476=$260,795K; diluted shares=66,065K; OE/sh=$3.9481. Source: FY2019 10-K, accession 0001032220-19-000105 (restated FY2017 comparative; original FY2017 10-K CFO was $337,200K).
2016 $3.15 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$180,026K. ΔWC=-$89,438K (AR billed/billable -51,986; AR unbilled -5,590; prepaid -2,027; deferred contract costs -398; AP&accrued -2,371; accrued comp -869; deferred revenue -11,661; income taxes -13,125; other -1,411, as itemized in the CF-statement reconciliation). SBC=$18,751K. Capex (PP&E and capitalized software)=$46,391K; capex_ratio=1.425% (mean capex/revenue FY2017-FY2025, same basis as the rest of the series); revenue $2,099,821K(FY2015)->$2,403,360K(FY2016), Δrev=$303,539K, growth capex=$4,325K, maintenance capex=$42,066K. OE=180,026+89,438-18,751-42,066=$208,647K; diluted shares=66,229K; OE/sh=$3.1504. Reconciliation: NI $178,362K + D&A ~$71.8K... see note: NI 178,362 + depreciation&amortization 58,404 + intangible amortization 13,377 - gain on sale of business 6,880 - maintenance capex 42,066 = $201,197K, within ~4% of OE. Source: FY2016 10-K, accession 0001032220-16-000249.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
United States (about 88% of revenue: federal government agencies nationwide plus state and local governments across the Northeast, Midwest, West and South); United Kingdom; Canada; smaller programs elsewhere outside the United States.
Historical growth strategy
Maximus grows by winning and renewing long-term government program-administration contracts (Medicaid and CHIP enrollment and eligibility, federal contact centers, veterans' medical disability exams), widening the scope of work on existing contracts, and making periodic large acquisitions to enter adjacent federal markets, such as the General Dynamics health unit in 2019 and VES in 2021. It has also exited non-core international businesses (Australia and Korea in fiscal 2025) and returned surplus cash through share buybacks and dividends.
Chart analysis
A chartist would call this a stock in a steep, well-defined downtrend. Shares have roughly halved from a 52-week high near $100 to about $52-53 in early October 2026, sitting just above the 52-week low near $51 after a series of lower highs and lower lows that accelerated after the August 2026 quarterly report. Price has broken down through the $60-65 area that had acted as support and trades below falling 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with negative MACD. RSI in the mid-30s reads as oversold but not yet washed out. A technician would want to see a base form, with a higher low and a reclaim of the broken $60 zone, before calling a bottom; until then the trend is down.
Competitors

Companies we consider competitors of MMS. Tap a ticker to open our analysis of that company in a new tab.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.