valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

enCore Energy Corp. (EU) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$0.00 ComplexityHigh Updated
Business condition attached to the margin of safety Owner earnings positive on a sustained basis, meaning cash from operations after stock compensation and upkeep spending is above zero for several consecutive years without depending on new share sales.
enCore Energy produces uranium from its South Texas operations and sells it to nuclear power plant operators in the United States. At the end of 2025 it had fourteen uranium sales agreements with US nuclear power plants and one older agreement with a uranium trading company. Committed deliveries total 7.95 million pounds: 0.90 million in 2026, 0.85 million in 2027, 1.00 million in 2028, 1.50 million in 2029, 1.20 million in 2030 and 2.50 million after that. Some of these contracts are priced at market and others carry floors and ceilings. What the business earns. We measure value by owner earnings: cash from operations, less working-capital swings, stock compensation and the upkeep share of capital spending. On that basis the company has been negative in each year we could calculate. Per share, owner earnings were about -$0.25 in 2022, -$0.18 in 2023, -$0.32 in 2024 and -$0.19 in 2025. In 2025 cash from operations was -$25.0 million, stock compensation was $4.2 million and capital spending was $20.0 million. Revenue fell from $58.3 million in 2024 to $43.2 million in 2025, when the company sold 655,000 pounds at an average of $65.89 per pound. Working-capital movement here is built from the inventory, receivable and prepaid lines only, so it is a partial figure; we did not include payables and accrued liabilities. The economics of the pounds sold have improved. Extracted pounds cost $41.02 each in 2025, and the company had a gross profit of $9.7 million, against a gross loss of $7.2 million in 2024. That is small next to the rest of the cost base. Operating expenses excluding stock option expense were $71.3 million in 2025 (up 18%), including $23.3 million of mineral property expenditures. Cases. Bear, base and bull are each worth $0 per share. A rough test of the committed contracts shows why. Applying the 2025 margin of about $25 per pound ($65.89 sold price against $41.02 extraction cost) to the 7.95 million committed pounds gives roughly $190 million of gross margin spread over 2026 and beyond. Holding overhead at only the non-property operating costs of about $48 million a year would consume that margin over the first five contract years alone, so the contracts alone do not produce positive owner earnings. Larger volumes, higher uranium prices, the new uranium discoveries announced in October 2025 in or near existing wellfields, and the 30.94 million pounds of measured and indicated resources are all possibilities. None yet has a signed contract or a record of production behind it that would let us count it, so we leave them out. We do not deduct debt or add balance-sheet cash to these values, so a value of $0 means we cannot support any value from proven earnings, not that the company owes more than it is worth. What would make this wrong. The company would be worth more than we show if its contracts and production convert into cash profits after overhead. Two things to watch are whether extraction costs stay near $41 per pound as volumes grow and whether operating expenses stop rising. In the first half of 2026 the net loss was $36.0 million and operating cash flow was -$42.5 million, so that has not yet happened. Margin-of-safety price. Because we can identify no evidenced earnings stream, there is no positive margin-of-safety price today. We would revisit the estimate once owner earnings have turned positive and stayed there.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 -$0.18 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(24,992)K; dWC (tagged inventory, receivable, prepaid lines) = $(14,629)K use of cash; SBC=$4,203K; capex=$19,997K, growth capex=$0 (revenue declined from $58,334K to $43,155K) so maintenance capex=$19,997K; OE=$(34,563)K; diluted shares=186.861M; OE/sh=$(0.185). Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001628280-26-022507. Payables/accrued lines not tagged in data pulled; WC figure partial.
2024 -$0.32 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(45,204)K; dWC (tagged inventory and prepaid lines) = +$7,585K source of cash; SBC=$4,788K; capex=$11,348K; growth capex = 30.9% x revenue increase $36,186K = $11,178K, so maintenance capex=$170K; OE=$(57,747)K; diluted shares=181.983M; OE/sh=$(0.317). Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001628280-26-022507 (FY2024 comparatives). Payables/accrued lines not tagged in data pulled; WC figure partial.
2023 -$0.18 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(22,987)K; dWC (tagged inventory and prepaid lines) = $(3,347)K use of cash; SBC=$3,464K; capex=$7,727K; capex/revenue mean 2022-25 = 30.9%, growth capex = 30.9% x revenue increase $17,903K = $5,530K, so maintenance capex=$2,197K; OE=$(25,304)K; diluted shares=144.044M; OE/sh=$(0.176). Source: FY2024 10-K, accession 0001500881-25-000002. Payables/accrued lines not tagged in data pulled; WC figure partial.
2022 -$0.25 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(20,310)K; dWC (tagged inventory and prepaid lines only) = +$962K source of cash; SBC=$4,332K; capex=$980K, prior-year revenue unavailable so growth capex not separated and all capex treated as maintenance; OE=$(26,584)K; diluted shares=105.529M; OE/sh=$(0.252). Source: FY2024 10-K, accession 0001500881-25-000002. Payables/accrued lines not tagged in the data pulled, so the WC figure is partial.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
United States (sales to nuclear power plant operators under fourteen agreements); one legacy agreement with a uranium trading company; production in South Texas
Historical growth strategy

We don't have historical growth strategy information for this company yet.

Chart analysis

We don't have chart analysis for this company yet.

Competitors

We don't have competitor information for this company yet.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.