valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

ELITE PHARMACEUTICALS INC /NV/ (ELTP) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$0.15 Updated
$0.09 $0.44
bear $0.09 base $0.28 bull $0.44 margin of safety $0.15 market price* $0.25
Business condition attached to the margin of safety At least one further quarter, following the just-reported quarter with revenue down roughly 20% year-over-year right after the recent peak, confirms the trend has stabilized (sequential revenue flat-to-up, and no loss or reduction of either of the two customers that made up about three-quarters of the most recent year's revenue) rather than continuing to deteriorate.
Elite Pharmaceuticals is a U.S. generic drug manufacturer that makes tablets and capsules, including several federally controlled central-nervous-system stimulants (generic versions of Adderall and Adderall XR), an opioid/analgesic combination, and other generics, sold both under its own "Elite Labs" label and under contract manufacturing and licensing arrangements with other companies. The business went through a real transformation in the last three fiscal years. After becoming profitable for the first time a few years ago, revenue has grown rapidly, driven mainly by new product launches moving to the higher-margin, self-branded Elite Labs line — most notably a generic version of Vyvanse (lisdexamfetamine), plus newer launches of an oxycodone/acetaminophen combination, naltrexone, and phentermine tablets. However, the most recently reported quarter shows this growth has already begun to cool: revenue came in about 20% below the same quarter a year earlier. Revenue is also concentrated — two customers accounted for roughly three-quarters of last year's sales — so a change in either relationship can move results materially. Because of this, we did not simply extend the recent growth rate forward. Instead we anchored the valuation on the median of the last five fiscal years' owner earnings per share, which lands well below the most recent peak year, and built the growth path from there assuming a sharp slowdown from the recent pace. Our bear case assumes the recent slowdown continues, competitive or customer pressure further compresses the newly launched products' economics, and owner earnings settle at a permanently lower, roughly flat level going forward. Our base case assumes growth decelerates quickly from the recent triple-digit pace to the high single digits within a few years, then to a very low, roughly flat rate over the long run, consistent with a business that keeps some of its edge from a steady cadence of new drug approvals but faces normal generic-drug price erosion on older products. Our bull case assumes the recent product launches keep contributing, additional approvals continue at a healthy pace, and margins keep benefiting from the shift to the company's own label, without a customer-related setback. We valued the business using its cash generated from operations as the starting point, since that already reflects every non-cash item without our having to guess at any of them — including a one-time, non-cash tax benefit and a non-cash gain related to warrant accounting recorded in a recent year. We removed the swings caused by the rapid buildup of receivables and inventory that came with the recent revenue growth, since those reflect timing rather than steady profitability, and we separated a one-time facility investment made a few years ago (which helped fund the later launches) from ordinary, maintenance-level spending. On this basis we estimate the shares are worth somewhere between $0.09 and $0.44, with a middle estimate near $0.28. Given the untested nature of the recent growth and the customer concentration, the margin-of-safety price sits at a significant discount to that middle estimate, and it assumes at least one more quarter confirming the business has stabilized.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2026 $0.04 ▼
CFO=$23,748,094; ΔWC=$(26,730,486) removed (AR +$31.6M, inventory +$5.0M on 77% revenue growth, offset by AP/accrued +$9.5M); SBC=$176,507; capex=$925,626, growth capex $2,554,152 exceeds capex → maint capex clamped to $0; OE=$50,302,073; diluted shares=1,138.37M; OE/sh=$0.0442. Accession 0001493152-26-031070.
2025 $0.02 ▼
CFO=$7,455,639; ΔWC=$(14,224,400) removed; SBC=$227,565; capex=$1,625,082, growth capex $1,080,301, maint capex=$544,781; OE=$20,907,693; diluted shares=1,068.29M; OE/sh=$0.0196. Accession 0001641172-25-017134.
2024 $0.01 ▼
CFO=$(3,235,115) (restated, accession 0001641172-25-017134); ΔWC=$(12,715,771) removed (large AR build of $16.6M and inventory build of $3.4M on 66% revenue growth, partly offset by AP/accrued +$7.78M); SBC=$159,921; capex=$809,653, growth capex $885,318 exceeds capex → maint capex clamped to $0; OE=$9,320,735; diluted shares=1,023.23M; OE/sh=$0.0091. NI was $20.1M vs this $9.3M OE because NI included a ~$20.0M non-cash deferred-tax valuation-allowance release and a ~$5.8M non-cash derivative/warrant fair-value gain, both correctly embedded in CFO and excluded via the CFO-based approach.
2023 -$0.00 ▼
CFO=$3,338,704; ΔWC=$(1,074,500) removed; SBC=$39,325; capex=$5,736,618 (one-time facility/equipment buildout), growth capex only $74,584 (revenue grew just $1.89M that year) so maint capex=$5,662,034; OE=$(1,288,155); diluted shares=1,012.91M; OE/sh=$(0.0013). Accession 0001493152-23-022936. Flagged as a non-recurring capex year.
2022 $0.01 ▼
CFO=$6,508,314; ΔWC=$(1,185,387) removed; SBC=$14,353; capex=$498,566, growth capex $271,122, maint capex=$227,444; OE=$7,451,904; diluted shares=1,010.61M; OE/sh=$0.0074. Accession 0001493152-22-018108.
2021 $0.01 ▼
CFO=$3,193,861; ΔWC=$(2,390,230) removed (AR/Inv/AP&accrued/prepaid lines); SBC=$13,181; capex=$329,981, growth capex $291,013 (3.94%×$7.39M rev growth), maint capex=$38,968; OE=$5,531,942; diluted shares=943.00M; OE/sh=$0.0059. Accession 0001213900-21-032329. First fiscal year the company was profitable; FY2015-2020 describe a going-concern-qualified, pre-scale business and are not part of the valuation anchor.
2020 $0.00 ▼
CFO=$(1,793,821); ΔWC=$(2,067,395) removed; SBC=$62,098; capex=$34,953, revenue grew $10.43M so computed growth capex ($410,581) exceeds capex → maint capex clamped to $0; OE=$211,476; diluted shares=993.26M; OE/sh=$0.0002. Accession 0001213900-20-016181.
2019 -$0.01 ▼
CFO=$(6,792,760); ΔWC=$(102,646) removed; SBC=$136,369; capex=$19,130, capex_ratio 3.94% (6-yr FY21-26 avg) × rev growth $109,797 → growth capex $4,324, maint capex=$14,806; OE=$(6,841,289); diluted shares=816.31M; OE/sh=$(0.0084). Accession 0001213900-19-011224.
2018 -$0.01 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maint capex. CFO=$(4,809,191); ΔWC (ΔAR −258,180[+258,180] + ΔInv −1,517,965[+1,517,965] + ΔAP&accrued +677,268)=+2,453,413 so removing it = −2,453,413; SBC=$244,753; capex=$180,937, no prior-year revenue on file so treated fully as maintenance; OE=$(7,688,294); diluted shares=798.17M; OE/sh=$(0.0096). Source: FY2018 10-K, accession 0001144204-18-034237.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography

We don't have sales geography information for this company yet.

Historical growth strategy

We don't have historical growth strategy information for this company yet.

Chart analysis

We don't have chart analysis for this company yet.

Competitors

We don't have competitor information for this company yet.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.