valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. (NGVC) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$15.00 ComplexitySimple Updated
$14.87 $36.76
bear $14.87 base $24.82 bull $36.76 margin of safety $15.00 market price* $30.61
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage runs about 170 small-format natural and organic grocery stores in 21 states, concentrated in Colorado and Texas and spread across the Mountain West, Southwest and Plains. The format is narrow and disciplined: roughly 11,000 square feet, all-organic produce, meat raised without antibiotics or added hormones, and an unusually large dietary-supplement department that earns far higher margins than food. The founding Isely family still runs the company and controls a majority of the votes. Sales come from comparable-store growth plus a handful of new stores a year; profit turns on gross margin, which depends on the mix between grocery and supplements, on shrink and on freight. The {N}Power loyalty programme now carries the large majority of sales. What has happened. Comparable sales grew 8.9% in fiscal 2024 and 7.3% in fiscal 2025 and net income doubled from $23 million to $46 million. In fiscal 2026 the surge has stopped: comparable sales are running near 1% for the first nine months and gross margin slipped back in the June quarter on mix, shrink and freight. Profit has held up better than sales, though: nine-month net income was $35.8 million against $34.6 million a year earlier, and operating cash flow was $55.1 million against $39.7 million. At the same time the company has restarted building, opening about six stores this year against two in fiscal 2025, and spent $39.9 million on capital projects in nine months against $23.1 million a year earlier. How we measured earnings. We start from operating cash flow, strip out swings in inventory, payables and other working capital, subtract stock compensation as a real cost, and subtract the capital spending needed to keep the existing stores running. Natural Grocers is a store-opening retailer, so we separate maintenance from growth spending by allocating only the spending that matches the year's sales increase to growth; because new stores are built before their sales arrive, most of any building programme still scores as maintenance, which is conservative. Some store assets are financed through finance leases and never pass through the capital-spending line, which flatters the figures slightly. On that basis ongoing owner earnings per share were $1.14, $1.27, $0.73, $1.22 and $2.01 in fiscal 2021 through 2025. We anchor on the median of those five years, $1.22 a share, because that window runs through the 2022 food-inflation squeeze, the low 2023 year and the 2025 peak and describes the business as it now operates. We set aside fiscal 2020 (pandemic pantry-loading) and 2016-2019 (a heavy owned-real-estate build-out under a different growth model). We do not anchor on fiscal 2025's $2.01: the comparable-sales surge behind it has already stopped. Adding back the roughly $3 million a year of cash interest the company pays, almost all of it on finance leases, gives a business-level figure of about $1.36 a share before lenders. Growth credited. Owner earnings rose 65% in fiscal 2025, an exceptional year that is not a run rate; for year one we assume about 4% above the anchor, supported by nine-month profit running slightly ahead of last year, and below the trailing actual rate. The only growth we treat as in the bag is the company's own long record: net store count has grown by two to three stores a year since 2019, funded entirely from its own cash, and comparable sales have tracked food inflation over a full decade that included negative years. We credit that at about 2.5% a year for ten years and then hold earnings flat. We do not credit the current six-store pace, a return to 7-9% comparable sales, margin expansion or entry into new regions, because none is yet demonstrated over a cycle. Base case. Comparable sales of 2-3%, two to four net new stores a year, gross margin near 29.5%, maintenance spending growing with the store base. Business earnings grow from about $1.42 a share to about $1.77 by year ten and hold there. The business is worth about $26.50 a share; it owes about $1.65 a share (finance-lease obligations of $45.8 million less cash beyond operating needs, against no bank borrowings under its $70 million revolver); the shares are worth about $24.80. Bear case. The company's own history supplies the episode. From 2016 to 2019, when Sprouts Farmers Market, Whole Foods and conventional grocers pushed into organic at lower prices, Natural Grocers' comparable sales turned negative and owner earnings collapsed from over $1 a share to between a loss and $0.70 for four years. We repeat that: comparable sales turn slightly negative from 2027, gross margin gives back recent gains toward 28%, the company keeps opening stores into a weakening base so maintenance spending stays elevated, and store-closing and impairment charges recur as they did in 2022 and 2024. Business earnings fall to about $0.75 a share for two years and recover to about $1.10, a level the business earned before the recent surge. The business is worth about $16.50 a share, owes about $1.65, and the shares are worth about $14.90. The real financial risk is not borrowing but roughly $275 million of operating lease commitments on long-dated store leases: rent cannot be shed quickly and exiting a weak store costs cash. Even in this case the business covers its roughly $3 million annual interest bill many times over. Bull case. The supplement department, private label and {N}Power personalisation keep traffic and baskets growing, comparable sales run 4-5%, gross margin holds near 30% and the steady store cadence extends into Texas and the Plains at average productivity. Business earnings start near fiscal 2025's demonstrated level of about $1.80 and grow about 4.5% a year to roughly $2.67. The business is worth about $38.40 a share, owes about $1.65, and the shares are worth about $36.80. Change since our previous estimate. Our earlier figures assumed the post-2023 margin and comparable-sales gains would compound at about 5% a year. Nine months of near-1% comparable sales and a sharp rise in building spending make that look optimistic, so we now credit only the slower growth the company has shown across a full decade. Against that, profit and cash flow this year have held up better than the slowdown in sales suggested, which supports the starting level. Margin of safety price. How sure are we of the earnings level? Moderately: the five-year window ranges from $0.73 to $2.01 a share, so the median is a fair centre but individual years swing widely with capital spending and margin. The worst plausible outcome is a repeat of 2016-2019, a multi-year price war in natural foods; the business survived that one with no bank debt, and it still has none, a fully undrawn revolver, essentially all stores leased, and no customer or supplier concentration, so the structure would survive a second round, though rent commitments would make it painful. The things we are most likely to be wrong about are whether the 2024-2025 margin gains are permanent and whether the current building programme earns its keep; if the gains fade and new stores underperform, the shares are worth something near the bear case, around $15. The price assumes a three-to-four-year holding period, over which the company pays a regular quarterly dividend. At $15 the price is roughly what the bear case supports; from that price the base case, with the shares moving toward about $25 over three years plus dividends, implies around 20% a year, and the bear case implies a small loss. That is why our margin of safety price is $15. What would make this wrong. Upward: if fiscal 2025's margin and earnings level proves durable, the earnings anchor is too low and even the base case understates the business. Downward: if the $50-million-a-year building programme is defending share rather than creating value, that spending is really a cost of staying in business and ongoing earnings are lower than any figure here. One item could not be tied out exactly: in fiscal 2024 our independent check of the cash-flow reconciliation differs from the filed statement by about 1%, a residual in the company's own catch-all line. It is immaterial.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 $2.01 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$55.3M; working-capital cash effect=$(23.5)M (accounts receivable $(0.4)M, income tax receivable $(0.6)M, merchandise inventory $(12.3)M, prepaid expenses $(5.5)M, accounts payable $(6.1)M, accrued expenses $1.4M), removed; SBC=$4.0M; capex=$31.2M, capex ratio = mean(capex/revenue) FY2016-FY2025 = 3.5307%, growth capex = 3.5307% x revenue change of $89.3M = $3.2M, maintenance capex=$28.0M; OE=$46.8M; diluted shares=23.3M; OE/sh=$2.01. ASC 842 operating-lease asset $33.6M and operating-lease liability $(34.4)M (net $(0.8)M) left inside CFO as the structural rent-paid-vs-rent-expensed difference, not a working-capital timing item. Reconciliation: net income $46.4M + D&A $31.8M + other non-cash $(2.6)M + lease pair $(0.8)M - maintenance capex $28.0M = $46.8M vs formula $46.8M (0.03%). Note: reported CFO fell 25% despite net income rising 37% solely because of the $23.5M working-capital drain (inventory build and accounts-payable reversal); removing that movement is what the formula is for, and nine-month FY2026 CFO of $55.1M vs $39.7M confirms it was timing, not earnings. Capex is reported gross of tenant allowances, which run through lease accounting rather than the investing section; store assets funded by finance leases (liabilities $49.7M at FY2025, up $2.5M in the year) are non-cash and bypass the capex line, so maintenance capex is modestly understated. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001437749-25-037556.
2024 $1.22 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$73.8M; working-capital cash effect=$8.8M (accounts receivable, income tax receivable, merchandise inventory, prepaid expenses, accounts payable $10.0M, accrued expenses $2.8M), removed; SBC=$2.8M; capex=$37.5M, capex ratio = mean(capex/revenue) FY2016-FY2025 = 3.5307%, growth capex = 3.5307% x revenue change of $101.0M = $3.6M, maintenance capex=$34.0M; OE=$28.2M; diluted shares=23.1M; OE/sh=$1.22. ASC 842 operating-lease asset $33.4M and operating-lease liability $(34.2)M (net $(0.8)M) left inside CFO as the structural rent-paid-vs-rent-expensed difference, not a working-capital timing item. Reconciliation: net income $33.9M + D&A $30.9M + other non-cash $(1.7)M (includes $2.1M impairment and store-closing costs, less $4.0M deferred tax benefit) + lease pair $(0.8)M - maintenance capex $34.0M = $28.5M vs formula $28.2M (-1.12%, an immaterial residual in the filer's Other line). Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001437749-25-037556.
2023 $0.73 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$64.6M; working-capital cash effect=$11.7M (accounts receivable, income tax receivable, merchandise inventory, prepaid expenses, accounts payable $10.4M, accrued expenses $6.3M), removed; SBC=$1.4M; capex=$36.6M, capex ratio = mean(capex/revenue) FY2016-FY2025 = 3.5307%, growth capex = 3.5307% x revenue change of $50.9M = $1.8M, maintenance capex=$34.8M; OE=$16.7M; diluted shares=22.8M; OE/sh=$0.73. ASC 842 operating-lease asset $33.1M and operating-lease liability $(33.9)M (net $(0.8)M) left inside CFO as the structural rent-paid-vs-rent-expensed difference, not a working-capital timing item. Reconciliation: net income $23.2M + D&A $28.9M + other non-cash $0.2M + lease pair $(0.8)M - maintenance capex $34.8M = $16.7M vs formula $16.7M (0.00%). Low year: capex stepped up to $36.6M on a small revenue increase, so almost all of it scored as maintenance. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001437749-25-037556.
2022 $1.27 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$39.7M; working-capital cash effect=$(17.2)M (accounts receivable, income tax receivable, merchandise inventory $(13.2)M on food inflation, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses), removed; SBC=$1.2M; capex=$28.0M, capex ratio = mean(capex/revenue) FY2016-FY2025 = 3.5307%, growth capex = 3.5307% x revenue change of $34.1M = $1.2M, maintenance capex=$26.8M; OE=$28.9M; diluted shares=22.8M; OE/sh=$1.27. ASC 842 operating-lease asset $31.9M and operating-lease liability $(29.0)M (net $2.9M) left inside CFO as the structural rent-paid-vs-rent-expensed difference, not a working-capital timing item. Reconciliation: net income $21.4M + D&A $27.9M + other non-cash $3.6M (includes $2.9M impairment and store-closing costs) + lease pair $2.9M - maintenance capex $26.8M = $28.9M vs formula $28.9M (0.00%). Source: FY2022 10-K, accession 0001437749-22-028744.
2021 $1.14 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$53.9M; working-capital cash effect=$1.5M (accounts receivable, income tax receivable, merchandise inventory, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses), removed; SBC=$0.9M; capex=$26.4M, capex ratio = mean(capex/revenue) FY2016-FY2025 = 3.5307%, growth capex = 3.5307% x revenue change of $18.7M = $0.7M, maintenance capex=$25.7M; OE=$25.8M; diluted shares=22.7M; OE/sh=$1.14. ASC 842 operating-lease asset $31.1M and operating-lease liability $(32.0)M (net $(0.9)M) left inside CFO as the structural rent-paid-vs-rent-expensed difference, not a working-capital timing item. Reconciliation: net income $20.6M + D&A $29.6M + other non-cash $2.3M + lease pair $(0.9)M - maintenance capex $25.7M = $25.8M vs formula $25.8M (0.00%). Source: FY2022 10-K, accession 0001437749-22-028744.
2020 $1.47 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$66.5M; working-capital cash effect=$10.2M (accounts receivable, income tax receivable, merchandise inventory, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses), removed; SBC=$1.1M; capex=$26.8M, capex ratio = mean(capex/revenue) FY2016-FY2025 = 3.5307%, growth capex = 3.5307% x revenue change of $133.3M = $4.7M, maintenance capex=$22.0M; OE=$33.1M; diluted shares=22.6M; OE/sh=$1.47. First year of ASC 842: operating-lease asset $30.2M and operating-lease liability $(30.6)M (net $(0.4)M) left inside CFO as the structural rent-paid-vs-rent-expensed difference, not a working-capital timing item. Reconciliation: net income $20.0M + D&A $31.2M + other non-cash $4.3M + lease pair $(0.4)M - maintenance capex $22.0M = $33.1M vs formula $33.1M (0.00%). FY2020 revenue rose 14.8% on COVID pantry-loading, an event that did not recur. Source: FY2022 10-K, accession 0001437749-22-028744.
2019 $0.59 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$37.4M; working-capital cash effect=$(5.2)M (accounts receivable, income tax receivable, merchandise inventory, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses), removed; SBC=$1.2M; capex=$30.0M, capex ratio = mean(capex/revenue) FY2016-FY2025 = 3.5307%, growth capex = 3.5307% x revenue change of $54.5M = $1.9M, maintenance capex=$28.1M; OE=$13.3M; diluted shares=22.6M; OE/sh=$0.59. Pre-842 deferred rent/deferred compensation (net $(1.3)M) left inside CFO as the structural rent-paid-vs-rent-expensed difference, not a working-capital timing item. Reconciliation: net income $9.4M + D&A $29.0M + other non-cash $4.2M + deferred-rent pair $(1.3)M - maintenance capex $28.1M = $13.3M vs formula $13.3M (0.00%). Source: FY2020 10-K, accession 0001437749-20-025108.
2018 $0.70 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$42.9M; working-capital cash effect=$5.6M (accounts receivable, income tax receivable, merchandise inventory, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses), removed; SBC=$0.8M; capex=$23.7M, capex ratio = mean(capex/revenue) FY2016-FY2025 = 3.5307%, growth capex = 3.5307% x revenue change of $80.0M = $2.8M, maintenance capex=$20.9M; OE=$15.6M; diluted shares=22.4M; OE/sh=$0.70. Pre-842 deferred rent/deferred compensation (net $(0.2)M) left inside CFO as the structural rent-paid-vs-rent-expensed difference, not a working-capital timing item. Reconciliation: net income $12.7M + D&A $29.4M + other non-cash $(5.4)M + deferred-rent pair $(0.2)M - maintenance capex $20.9M = $15.6M vs formula $15.6M (0.00%). Source: FY2018 10-K, accession 0001437749-18-021661.
2017 $0.05 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$40.8M; working-capital cash effect=$0.0M (accounts receivable, income tax receivable, merchandise inventory, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses), removed; SBC=$0.8M; capex=$41.1M, capex ratio = mean(capex/revenue) FY2016-FY2025 = 3.5307%, growth capex = 3.5307% x revenue change of $63.5M = $2.2M, maintenance capex=$38.9M; OE=$1.1M; diluted shares=22.5M; OE/sh=$0.05. Pre-842 deferred rent/deferred compensation (net $3.4M) left inside CFO as the structural rent-paid-vs-rent-expensed difference, not a working-capital timing item. Reconciliation: net income $6.9M + D&A $29.5M + other non-cash $0.2M + deferred-rent pair $3.4M - maintenance capex $38.9M = $1.1M vs formula $1.1M (0.00%). Still in the heavy build-out phase. Source: FY2018 10-K, accession 0001437749-18-021661.
2016 -$0.17 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$28.8M; working-capital cash effect=$(19.0)M (accounts receivable, income tax receivable, merchandise inventory, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses), removed; SBC=$0.9M; capex=$53.8M, capex ratio = mean(capex/revenue) FY2016-FY2025 = 3.5307%, growth capex = 3.5307% x revenue change of $80.8M = $2.9M, maintenance capex=$50.9M; OE=$(3.9)M; diluted shares=22.5M; OE/sh=$(0.17). ASC 842 operating-lease asset/liability pair and pre-842 deferred rent/deferred compensation (net $3.0M) left inside CFO as the structural rent-paid-vs-rent-expensed difference, not a working-capital timing item. Reconciliation: net income $11.5M + D&A $25.5M + other non-cash $7.0M + lease/deferred-rent pair $3.0M - maintenance capex $50.9M = $(3.9)M vs formula $(3.9)M (0.00%). FY2016 was the peak of the owned-real-estate build-out (103 to 126 stores), so capex far exceeded the revenue-based growth allowance. Source: FY2018 10-K, accession 0001437749-18-021661.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
United States only, from roughly 170 stores in 21 states across the West, South and Midwest, concentrated in Colorado and Texas, with stores also in Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, Arkansas and Louisiana.
Historical growth strategy
Organic growth through new small-format stores (about 11,000 square feet) opened in mid-sized markets across the Mountain West, Southwest and Plains, funded from operating cash flow and finance leases rather than acquisitions, supported by comparable-store sales growth driven by the {N}Power loyalty programme, private label and a high-margin dietary-supplement department. Openings ran at 15-20 a year in the mid-2010s, slowed to a handful a year after 2017, and were restarted at about six a year in fiscal 2026.
Chart analysis
A chartist would see a long base followed by a powerful breakout: the shares spent 2016 through 2023 mostly range-bound in single digits to low teens, then broke out in 2024 and ran to the $40s-$50s by early 2025 on accelerating comparable sales, a classic momentum advance with higher highs and higher lows. Since then the trend has rolled over into a series of lower highs as comparable sales slowed in 2026, with the stock falling back below its rising longer-term moving averages; a chartist would treat the prior breakout area in the low-to-mid $20s as the key support zone and want to see a higher low hold there before calling the uptrend intact again.
Competitors

Companies we consider competitors of NGVC. Tap a ticker to open our analysis of that company in a new tab.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.