valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

MONARCH CASINO & RESORT INC (MCRI) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$78.00 ComplexitySimple Updated
$75.28 $142.06
bear $75.28 base $114.64 bull $142.06 margin of safety $78.00 market price* $113.59
Monarch owns and runs two casino resorts: the Atlantis Casino Resort Spa in Reno, Nevada (817 rooms, about 61,000 square feet of casino floor) and Monarch Casino Resort Spa in Black Hawk, Colorado (516 rooms, about 60,000 square feet), in the gaming town closest to Denver. The Black Hawk property was rebuilt and greatly expanded between 2017 and 2020. Revenue was $545M in 2025, and the company has no bank borrowings. How we measured earnings. We measure the cash the business produces for its owners after the spending needed to keep both properties fresh, and after stock-based pay, which we treat as a real cost. We use only 2022 onward, the first years with the expanded Black Hawk fully open; earlier years describe a much smaller company in the middle of a building project. Those four years produced $5.29, $4.27, $3.62 and $6.39 a share. Two of them were held down by the dispute with PCL, the contractor that built the Black Hawk expansion: about $7M of litigation cost in 2023 and a $27.6M charge in 2024 when the court ruled against Monarch. Setting those one-time charges aside, the business earned roughly $4.50 to $5.30 a share in 2022-2024 and $6.39 in 2025. The 2025 step-up has since been confirmed by two further quarters: net income rose 39% in the first quarter of 2026 and 20% in the second, on revenue up 6.4% for the half year, with hotel costs falling as room rates rose. Three corroborating periods are enough for us to raise our earnings level, to $6.00 a share. That is below the 2025 figure because part of the 2026 gain came from a one-time stock-option tax benefit and because 2025 is the best year on record. Interest paid is negligible, so the business's cash flow and the owners' cash flow are essentially the same. The contractor dispute. In February 2025 a Denver court awarded PCL about $74.5M against Monarch, with 6% interest running after judgment. Monarch has appealed and posted a bond; PCL has cross-appealed seeking pre-judgment interest, which the trial court denied, and the trial court also denied PCL's claim for legal fees in February 2026. Monarch has recorded the full $77.3M on its balance sheet, so we treat it as money owed and deduct it in every case. Previously we treated this as an unquantified claim; the amount is now fixed by the court, which removes the condition we attached to our earlier estimate. Base case. The two properties hold their current earnings, with no assumed growth in the business itself: no further Black Hawk ramp, no new rooms, no Reno market boom, because none of that is secured. What we do credit is the buyback: the share count has fallen from 19.6M in 2023 to about 18.2M, paid for from cash, so per-share earnings rise about 2% a year. Beyond year 10 the properties are hard, well-maintained assets in licensed markets with high barriers to new supply, so earnings continue at the year-10 level without further growth. The business is worth about $115 a share; it owes about $80M on the PCL judgment with interest, roughly offset by about $80M of cash beyond what the casinos need, leaving the shares worth about $115. Bear case. Regional casinos are consumer-discretionary businesses that have cycled. In the 2008-2010 recession Reno-area gaming revenue fell by roughly a quarter and Monarch's own earnings fell by more than half; Colorado added a smoking ban in 2008 on top of the downturn. We start from a lower level ($5.24, the post-construction median with one-time litigation removed), then place a similar recession in years 3 to 5, with earnings falling 50% at the trough and recovering over three years to only 90% of the starting level, reflecting a permanent loss of share to online casino gaming (which Monarch is spending money to oppose) or new competition in Black Hawk. PCL wins its cross-appeal and adds about $15M of pre-judgment interest. The business is worth about $76 a share; it owes about $97M against about $80M of spare cash, leaving about $75. Even at the trough the company has no debt service to meet, so this case is survivable. Bull case. The 2026 run-rate holds: earnings start at $6.70, roughly the first-half 2026 pace without the tax benefit, and room-rate pricing plus buybacks lift per-share earnings about 3.5% a year. The appeal does not reduce the judgment, so we still deduct it in full. The business is worth about $142 a share and the shares about $142. Margin of safety price: $78. We are fairly sure of the earnings level: four clean years plus two corroborating quarters, and a cash-rich balance sheet with no bank debt. The worst plausible event is a recession arriving together with a lasting loss of share in Black Hawk or Reno; with only two properties there is nowhere to hide, but with no debt and owned real estate the company would survive it. The things we are most likely to be wrong about are whether 2025-2026 is a new normal or a peak, and how much online gaming takes from regional casino floors; if the old $5 level returns without any recession, the shares are worth about $95. Over the holding period, the company pays a $1.20 annual dividend and retires 2-3% of its shares a year. At $78 the price is below even the recession case value, and if the business simply holds its earnings for about two years, a move to the base-case value plus dividends implies a return of 20% a year from that price. Above that price a recession in the first few years would leave too little room.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 $6.39 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$164.7M; dWC=$2.7M (cash effect, positive = source of cash); SBC=$8.4M; capex=$36.3M (6.7% of revenue, the lowest in the series), capex ratio=8.443% (mean capex/revenue over FY2022-FY2025); revenue +$22.9M so growth capex=$1.9M and maintenance capex=$34.4M; OE=$119.2M; diluted shares=18.660M; OE/sh=$6.39. Strongest of the four post-construction years; net income also rose from $72.8M to $101.4M. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001104659-26-018717.
2024 $3.62 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$140.7M; dWC=$18.4M (cash effect, positive = source of cash); SBC=$7.9M; capex=$47.4M, capex ratio=8.443%; revenue +$20.7M so growth capex=$1.7M and maintenance capex=$45.7M; OE=$68.7M; diluted shares=18.971M; OE/sh=$3.62. Weakest of the four post-construction years. Source: FY2024 10-K, accession 0001558370-25-002045.
2023 $4.27 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$173.0M; dWC=$35.1M (cash effect, positive = source of cash - roughly $24M of this is the CARES Act net-operating-loss carryback refund claimed in 2020 and collected in 2023, a non-recurring source of cash correctly removed here); SBC=$7.1M; capex=$49.0M, capex ratio=8.443%; revenue +$23.6M so growth capex=$2.0M and maintenance capex=$47.0M; OE=$83.8M; diluted shares=19.618M; OE/sh=$4.27. Source: FY2023 10-K, accession 0001558370-24-002025.
2022 $5.29 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$139.8M; dWC=$(1.4)M (cash effect, positive = source of cash); SBC=$5.1M; capex=$39.5M, capex ratio=8.443% (mean capex/revenue over FY2022-FY2025); revenue +$82.5M so growth capex=$7.0M and maintenance capex=$32.5M; OE=$103.6M; diluted shares=19.578M; OE/sh=$5.29. First fully clean post-construction year. Source: FY2022 10-K, accession 0001558370-23-002340.
2021 $4.41 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$128.1M; dWC=$9.2M (cash effect, positive = source of cash); SBC=$4.1M; capex=$46.9M, capex ratio=8.443%; revenue +$211.0M (reopening from the pandemic plus the first full year of the expanded Black Hawk property) so growth capex=$17.8M and maintenance capex=$29.1M; OE=$85.7M; diluted shares=19.427M; OE/sh=$4.41. Excluded from the valuation anchor: capacity restrictions persisted into mid-2021 and the expanded property was still ramping. Source: FY2021 10-K, accession 0001558370-22-002306.
2020 $2.24 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$31.4M; dWC=$(30.3)M (cash effect, positive = source of cash); SBC=$3.9M; capex=$88.7M; OE=$42.2M; diluted shares=18.877M; OE/sh=$2.24. Two distortions in this year. First, revenue fell $64.8M on pandemic casino closures, so the standard formula sets growth capex to zero and would treat the entire $88.7M as maintenance; in fact construction-in-progress collapsed from $285.8M to $6.3M as the Black Hawk expansion was placed in service, so this is completion spend on a growth project. JUDGEMENT (spec s2.1 / s7.6): maintenance capex capped at 8.443% of revenue = $15.6M, the remaining $73.1M classified as growth capex. Second, cash capex understates FY2020 construction activity because construction payable jumped to $49.8M and has never been paid down. Excluded from the valuation anchor. Source: FY2020 10-K, accession 0001558370-21-002943.
2019 $1.48 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$63.2M; dWC=$6.3M (cash effect, positive = source of cash); SBC=$8.2M; capex=$125.4M; OE=$27.7M; diluted shares=18.684M; OE/sh=$1.48. JUDGEMENT (spec s2.1 / s7.6): FY2019 is the second construction peak; construction-in-progress reached $285.8M at year end. Maintenance capex capped at the post-construction steady-state rate of 8.443% of revenue = $21.0M, the remaining $104.4M classified as growth capex, rather than the $124.6M the revenue-change formula would call maintenance. Excluded from the valuation anchor. Source: FY2019 10-K, accession 0001558370-20-002525.
2018 $1.54 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$58.8M; dWC=$4.4M (cash effect, positive = source of cash); SBC=$5.5M; capex=$137.1M (57% of revenue - the construction peak); OE=$28.6M; diluted shares=18.574M; OE/sh=$1.54. JUDGEMENT (spec s2.1 / s7.6): FY2018 sits inside the Black Hawk expansion; construction-in-progress rose from $48.8M to $180.5M during the year. The standard formula would call $136.3M of this maintenance capex because revenue rose only $9.6M while construction spend ballooned. Maintenance capex is instead capped at the post-construction steady-state rate of 8.443% of revenue = $20.3M, the remaining $116.8M classified as growth capex. Excluded from the valuation anchor. Source: FY2018 10-K, accession 0001558370-19-002010.
2017 $1.40 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$49.5M; dWC=$(2.8)M (cash effect, positive = source of cash); SBC=$7.1M; capex=$50.0M; OE=$25.7M; diluted shares=18.367M; OE/sh=$1.40. JUDGEMENT (spec s2.1 / s7.6): FY2017 is the first year of the Black Hawk expansion - construction-in-progress rose from $9.8M at end-2016 to $48.8M at end-2017, then to $285.8M at end-2019, emptying in 2020 when the property opened. The standard growth-capex formula allocates on revenue change, and revenue moved only $13.7M while construction spend ballooned, so it would call $48.8M of this maintenance capex, which is plainly wrong. Maintenance capex is instead capped at the post-construction steady-state rate of 8.443% of revenue = $19.5M, with the remaining $30.5M classified as growth capex. FY2017-FY2020 are excluded from the valuation anchor for this reason. Source: FY2017 10-K, accession 0001558370-18-002048.
2016 $0.89 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$43.7M; dWC=$1.4M (cash effect, positive = source of cash); SBC=$1.7M; capex=$26.1M, capex ratio=8.443% (mean capex/revenue over the FY2022-FY2025 post-construction anchor window); revenue +$14.8M so growth capex=$1.2M and maintenance capex=$24.9M; OE=$15.7M; diluted shares=17.664M; OE/sh=$0.89. Source: FY2016 10-K, accession 0001558370-17-001767.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
United States: West (Nevada - Reno-Sparks area; Colorado - Black Hawk, drawing on the Denver metropolitan area)
Historical growth strategy
Organic reinvestment in its own two owned properties rather than serial acquisitions: one acquisition (the Black Hawk casino in 2012) followed by a self-funded rebuild and expansion of that property into a hotel-casino resort (2017-2020), plus continual refurbishment and room and amenity upgrades at the Atlantis in Reno. Since the expansion was finished, surplus cash has gone to share buybacks and dividends while the company carries no bank debt.
Chart analysis
A chartist would describe a long-term uptrend: the shares rose from the low teens a decade ago to the high double digits after the expanded Black Hawk property opened, with a sharp pandemic crash in 2020 that fully recovered within about a year. Since 2021 the stock has moved in a broad sideways range rather than trending, with rallies repeatedly stalling near prior highs and pullbacks finding support in the $60s-$70s. A chartist would watch for a decisive break above the old highs as confirmation that the long-term uptrend has resumed, and treat a break below the bottom of the multi-year range as a sign the consolidation has turned into a top.
Competitors

Companies we consider competitors of MCRI. Tap a ticker to open our analysis of that company in a new tab.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.