valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

Bancorp, Inc. (TBBK) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$45.00 ComplexityHigh Updated
$33.11 $131.84
bear $33.11 base $83.78 bull $131.84 margin of safety $45.00 market price* $49.60
The Bancorp is a branchless bank that sits behind many of America's prepaid, payroll, debit, gift-card and government-benefit card programs. Fintech and payments companies bring the customers; The Bancorp holds their deposits, runs the regulated banking plumbing and earns card, ACH and payment fees. Those deposits, $8.17 billion at the end of 2025 and $7.48 billion at June 30, 2026, are mostly millions of small transaction balances and are unusually cheap, costing an average of 2.06% in 2025. The bank lends them out through securities-backed lines of credit, real estate bridge loans on multifamily workforce housing ($2.26 billion, about 31% of loans, largest exposures in Texas, Georgia, Florida, New Jersey and Indiana), SBA and small-business loans, vehicle fleet leases, and a fast-growing book of short-term consumer fintech loans on which the originating partner covers the bank's credit losses. Total loans were $7.01 billion at June 30, 2026, essentially flat on the year-end figure. How we measured earnings. We start from operating cash flow, remove working-capital timing and stock-based pay, and charge the credit losses the bank actually realized rather than the reserves it set aside. In 2025 the bank wrote off $156.9 million of loans net of recoveries, but $151.1 million of that was on consumer fintech loans for which the partner paid the bank in cash, so the loss the bank itself bore was $5.9 million, after $4.8 million in 2024. On that basis owner earnings were $89 million in 2020, $116 million in 2021, $145 million in 2022, $198 million in 2023, $223 million in 2024 and $219 million in 2025 ($4.71 per diluted share). Reserve building that has not yet turned into realized losses, including on the bridge-loan book, is not charged against normal earnings; the risk it points to is carried in the bear case. Years before 2020 are not comparable, because the company then ran a commercial mortgage securitization business and European prepaid operations it has since exited. Because this is a bank, deposits and borrowings are its raw material and interest is already charged in these earnings, so we value earnings after interest and do not subtract debt, including the $200 million of 7.375% holding-company senior notes due September 2030. Starting point. We anchor on $219 million, the median of 2023 to 2025, the years that reflect today's balance sheet and fee franchise; 2020 to 2022 describe a smaller bank earning near-zero rates. Those three years benefited from high short-term rates, which is the main thing that could make this level too high. Net interest income for the first half of 2026 was $179.3 million, 5% below the prior year, yet net income was $120.7 million, 3% higher, because credit costs fell and fees held up. Buybacks have cut the diluted share count from 58.8 million in 2021 to 41.8 million in the second quarter of 2026 ($378 million repurchased in 2025 and $101 million in the first half of 2026). We divide total earnings by today's 41.8 million shares rather than extrapolating past per-share gains. Capital to grow. A bank cannot pay out everything it earns while its loans grow, because each new dollar of loans needs equity behind it. Shareholders' equity was $705 million at June 30, 2026, about 10% of loans, so in every case we hold back 10 cents of earnings for each dollar of loan growth that case assumes and count only the rest as value. Base case (about $84 per share). Owner earnings fell 2% in total in 2025 (up 7% per share because of buybacks). We hold the first year flat rather than lower only because both reported quarters of 2026 show net income above the prior year, and we assume no loan growth that year because the loan book was flat in the first half. From the second year, earnings and loans grow 3% a year, reaching about $286 million in the tenth year, with $21 million to $28 million a year held back to fund loan growth. That growth rests on what the franchise has already done: deposits roughly doubled from $3.94 billion at the end of 2018 to $8.17 billion at the end of 2025 through partner programs, and fintech fees rose from $99 million in 2023 to $141 million in 2025. It is credited well below those rates because lower short-term rates are already shrinking interest income and deposits fell in the first half of 2026. After the tenth year earnings are held flat for twenty more years and then given no value; the regulatory licensing, compliance scale and two-decade partner relationships behind the card-sponsorship business are the evidence for that persistence. Bear case (about $33 per share). This case runs one full commercial real estate credit cycle of the kind transitional multifamily lending went through in 2008 to 2011, plus the concentration and rate risks the company discloses. Bridge-loan credit: non-performing loans already rose from $33.8 million to $74.0 million during 2025 and the bank holds $60.7 million of foreclosed real estate. We charge $55 million a year of realized bridge losses before tax for three years, about $165 million in total or roughly 7% of the $2.26 billion book, in line with cumulative losses on transitional apartment loans in that cycle, about $41 million a year after tax. Rates: we take $15 million after tax off the first year and $20 million a year after that as rate cuts keep shrinking interest income. Partner concentration: the top three partner relationships held $3.83 billion (47%) of deposits at the end of 2025 and produced $83.5 million (59%) of fintech fees; we assume one leaves at renewal from the second year, costing its fees and forcing about $1.3 billion of 2% deposits to be replaced with funding near 4.3%, about $47 million a year after tax. Earnings fall to $165 million in the first year and $110 million in the second and third, settle at $150 million through the tenth year with no loan growth, and then fade to zero over the following ten years. Even at the trough the bank stays well profitable on equity of about $705 million, so no capital raise at depressed prices is needed. The fade reflects regulatory exposure: the treatment of most partner-sourced deposits as non-brokered rests on an FDIC position that can change, and the company reported, and later remediated, material weaknesses in its controls at the end of 2024, including over the accounting for its consumer fintech credit enhancement. A pending securities class action alleging the company understated bridge-loan problems in 2024 and 2025 seeks unspecified damages and is not separately quantified. This value is about twice tangible book of roughly $17 per share; the franchise is worth more than its capital in a downturn because its deposits are fee-linked transaction balances from partner programs rather than rate-shopping savings, so the bank keeps earning a wide spread through the cycle. Bull case (about $132 per share). The company's own levers execute: consumer fintech lending keeps scaling with partner-covered losses, fee income keeps growing and the bridge book works out with little loss. Earnings and loans grow 4% in the first year, 8% a year for the next four (below the 14% and 16% loan growth of 2024 and 2025) and 5% a year for the five after that, reaching about $395 million in the tenth year after holding back $28 million to $74 million a year to fund that growth. The franchise then sustains that level without further growth. What would make this wrong. The value leans on the deposit-and-fee franchise lasting well beyond ten years and on 2023 to 2025 not being a high-rate peak. The loss of a top-three partner, a partner failing to cover fintech losses, a change in how regulators classify partner deposits, or bridge-loan losses well beyond the 2008 to 2011 pattern would show up first in deposit balances, net interest income and realized charge-offs. What changed. Since our review in September the business itself has not materially changed. The base case is slightly lower because loans were flat and deposits fell about $690 million in the first half of 2026, which argues for slower credited growth; the bear case is slightly lower because the rise in non-performing bridge loans during 2025 supports a longer period of realized losses. Margin-of-safety price. We are reasonably sure of the earnings level: realized credit costs have been tiny outside the partner-covered fintech book, and the 2023 to 2025 results held up through 2026 rate cuts. The worst plausible outcome no case fully models is a regulatory action against fintech partner banking that forces the bank to shed programs, or a top partner that both leaves and fails to honour its credit guarantee in the same year; the bank's modest leverage and diversified loan book would survive either, but the shares could lose half their value. If we are wrong about the durability of the cheap deposits and about bridge-loan losses, the shares are worth roughly the low-to-mid $30s. The business pays little in dividends but retires shares quickly, which raises each remaining share's claim on earnings, and the price assumes a three-to-five-year holding period. At $45 the earnings yield on our anchor is above 10%, so steady buybacks and modest growth carry most of the way to a 20% annual return if the base case holds, while the bear case value limits the downside if it does not. Above that price the return depends too much on the bull case, so the margin-of-safety price is $45.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 $4.71 ▼
RESTATED 2026-09-23 to lender basis (superseded basis: prior row deducted the credit provision net of fintech credit-enhancement income; the settled lender rule deducts REALIZED net charge-offs net of partner reimbursements actually received; whole 2020-25 series recomputed on this basis). OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − realized net credit losses − maintenance capex, plus bank adjustments: securities premium amortization/(discount accretion) reversed, realized gains on commercial loans at fair value restored (proceeds sit in investing). CFO=$265,009K (already adds back provision $177,693K and deducts credit-enhancement income $169,294K); ΔWC=+$23,646K removed (AIR $(1,377)K, other assets $17,692K, other liabilities $7,331K); SBC=$19,604K; realized credit loss = net charge-offs $156,928K − fintech net charge-offs $151,066K reimbursed by partner (credit enhancement agreement cash inflows $151,065K, investing section) = $5,862K; accretion $(7,686)K reversed (+$7,686K); realized FV-loan gains +$1,815K; capex=$7,090K, capex ratio 1.386% (mean 2020-25, revenue = NII + noninterest income ex credit-enhancement), revenue $534,550K vs $503,104K, growth capex $436K, maintenance capex $6,654K. OE = 265,009 − 23,646 − 19,604 − 5,862 + 7,686 + 1,815 − 6,654 = $218,744K. Credit-loss reserve build and $1.0M security ACL reversal not in level (bear case). Diluted shares 46.422M; OE/sh=$4.71. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001295401-26-000002 (net charge-off table by category; cash-flow statement).
2024 $4.41 ▼
RESTATED 2026-09-23 to lender basis (superseded basis: prior row deducted provision $38,374K net of credit-enhancement income $30,651K = $7,723K; settled lender rule deducts REALIZED net charge-offs net of partner reimbursements actually received; whole 2020-25 series recomputed). OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − realized net credit losses − maintenance capex, plus bank adjustments as in FY2025 row. CFO=$209,911K (as restated in FY2025 10-K; credit-enhancement cash in investing); ΔWC=$(31,416)K removed (AIR $(4,179)K, other assets $(26,210)K, other liabilities $(1,027)K); SBC=$14,983K; realized credit loss = net charge-offs $22,495K (restated) − fintech net charge-offs $17,742K reimbursed by partner (credit enhancement agreement cash inflows $17,742K) = $4,753K; accretion $(2,608)K reversed; realized FV-loan gains +$3,699K; capex=$4,974K, ratio 1.386%, revenue $503,104K vs $466,146K, growth capex $512K, maintenance capex $4,462K. OE = 209,911 + 31,416 − 14,983 − 4,753 + 2,608 + 3,699 − 4,462 = $223,436K. Diluted shares 50.713M; OE/sh=$4.41. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001295401-26-000002.
2023 $3.59 ▼
RESTATED 2026-09-23 to lender basis (superseded basis: prior row deducted total provision $18,330K incl. a $10,000K reserve on an investment security; settled lender rule deducts REALIZED net charge-offs net of partner reimbursements actually received, reserve builds go to bear case; whole 2020-25 series recomputed). OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − realized net credit losses − maintenance capex, plus bank adjustments as in FY2025 row. CFO=$186,853K (latest restated); ΔWC=$(30,987)K removed (AIR $(5,529)K, other assets $(38,067)K, other liabilities $12,609K); SBC=$11,392K; realized credit loss = net charge-offs $3,461K (no fintech credit-enhancement program cash in 2023); amortization $1,023K reversed (−$1,023K); realized FV-loan gains +$6,954K; capex=$12,689K, ratio 1.386%, revenue $466,146K vs $354,524K, growth capex $1,547K, maintenance capex $11,142K. OE = 186,853 + 30,987 − 11,392 − 3,461 − 1,023 + 6,954 − 11,142 = $197,776K. Diluted shares 55.053M; OE/sh=$3.59. Source: FY2025 10-K accession 0001295401-26-000002 (CFO lines); net charge-offs FY2023 10-K accession 0001562762-24-000049.
2022 $2.54 ▼
RESTATED 2026-09-23 to lender basis (superseded basis: prior row deducted provision $7,108K; settled lender rule deducts REALIZED net charge-offs; whole 2020-25 series recomputed). OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − realized net credit losses − maintenance capex, plus bank adjustments as in FY2025 row. CFO=$119,615K (restated, FY2024 10-K/A); ΔWC=$(22,245)K removed (AIR $(14,134)K, other assets $(1,404)K, other liabilities $(6,707)K); SBC=$7,592K; realized credit loss = net charge-offs $1,173K (charge-offs $1,461K − recoveries $288K); premium amortization $1,704K reversed; realized FV-loan gains +$18,635K; capex=$5,134K, ratio 1.386%, revenue $354,524K vs $315,625K, growth capex $539K, maintenance capex $4,595K. OE = 119,615 + 22,245 − 7,592 − 1,173 − 1,704 + 18,635 − 4,595 = $145,431K. Diluted shares 57.269M; OE/sh=$2.54. Source: FY2024 10-K/A accession 0001562762-25-000074; line detail and net charge-offs FY2022 10-K accession 0001562762-23-000066.
2021 $1.97 ▼
RESTATED 2026-09-23 to lender basis (superseded basis: prior row deducted provision $3,110K; settled lender rule deducts REALIZED net charge-offs; whole 2020-25 series recomputed). OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − realized net credit losses − maintenance capex, plus bank adjustments as in FY2025 row. CFO=$83,892K; ΔWC=$(32,842)K removed (AIR $2,587K, other assets $(17,030)K, other liabilities $(18,399)K); SBC=$8,626K; realized credit loss = net charge-offs $789K (charge-offs $2,006K − recoveries $1,217K); premium amortization $3,458K reversed; realized FV-loan gains +$12,929K; capex=$1,549K, ratio 1.386%, revenue $315,625K vs $279,483K, growth capex $501K, maintenance capex $1,048K. OE = 83,892 + 32,842 − 8,626 − 789 − 3,458 + 12,929 − 1,048 = $115,742K (NI $110,653K incl. discontinued ops). Diluted shares 58.830M; OE/sh=$1.97. Source: FY2022 10-K, accession 0001562762-23-000066.
2020 $1.52 ▼
RESTATED 2026-09-23 to lender basis (superseded basis: prior row deducted provision $6,352K; settled lender rule deducts REALIZED net charge-offs; whole 2020-25 series recomputed). OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − realized net credit losses − maintenance capex, plus bank adjustments as in FY2025 row. CFO=$120,685K (as reclassified in FY2021/FY2022 10-K; the FY2020 10-K originally showed $(512,178)K with loans-held-for-sale originations in operating); ΔWC=+$5,000K removed (AIR $(6,839)K, other assets $2,350K, other liabilities $9,489K); SBC=$6,429K; realized credit loss = net charge-offs $2,920K (charge-offs $3,593K − recoveries $673K); premium amortization $15,825K reversed; realized FV-loan gains +$1,684K; capex=$3,738K, ratio 1.386%, revenue $279,483K vs $245,415K, growth capex $472K, maintenance capex $3,266K. OE = 120,685 − 5,000 − 6,429 − 2,920 − 15,825 + 1,684 − 3,266 = $88,929K (NI $80,084K). Diluted shares 58.411M; OE/sh=$1.52. Source: FY2022 10-K accession 0001562762-23-000066; net charge-offs FY2020/FY2021 10-Ks. Years before 2020 not written: CFO on those filings includes held-for-sale CMBS loan originations and discontinued European/prepaid operations, not comparable.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
United States nationwide (Northeast, Midwest, South, West) through fintech and payments partner card, payroll, prepaid and consumer lending programs; real estate bridge lending concentrated in Texas, Georgia, Florida, New Jersey and Indiana
Historical growth strategy
Organic growth by signing and expanding sponsorship agreements with payments and fintech partners whose card and account programs bring low-cost transaction deposits and fee income, and lending those deposits through specialty niches (securities-backed lines of credit, real estate bridge loans, SBA loans, fleet leasing and partner-guaranteed consumer fintech loans); since 2019 it has exited non-core lines (CMBS securitization, European prepaid) and returned most earnings through large share buybacks rather than acquisitions.
Chart analysis
A chartist would see a long secular uptrend: the shares climbed from single digits in 2020 into the $50s and $60s by 2024-2025, a multi-bagger driven by consistent higher highs and higher lows. Since 2025 the pattern has turned choppier, with sharp gaps on earnings and credit headlines and a trading range roughly in the mid-$40s to low-$60s through 2026, with the mid-$50s acting as a pivot. A chartist would treat a break above the prior highs as resumption of the long uptrend, and a break below the range lows as a sign the multi-year trend has ended.
Competitors

Companies we consider competitors of TBBK. Tap a ticker to open our analysis of that company in a new tab.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.