valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

ROCKY BRANDS, INC. (RCKY) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$47.00 ComplexityAverage Updated
$40.00 $124.60
bear $40.00 base $87.40 bull $124.60 margin of safety $47.00 market price* $45.81
Business condition attached to the margin of safety Net debt resuming its decline from actual earnings paydown (not another inventory liquidation) toward its prior run-rate, no further write-down of the acquired Muck/XTRATUF-era trademarks, and confirmation that the unusually large first-half-2026 gross-margin gain reflects a durable pricing/mix shift rather than a one-time item.
Rocky Brands designs and sells work, western, outdoor, and duty footwear under the Rocky, Georgia Boot, Durango, and Lehigh names, along with the Muck, XTRATUF, Servus, Ranger, and Neos brands acquired from Honeywell in 2021 for roughly $230 million — a deal that doubled the company's size and took on debt that peaked near $270 million. We measure owner earnings — cash the business generates after stripping out inventory swings, stock compensation, and the capital spending needed just to keep operating — using the four years since that acquisition settled in (2022 through 2025), because everything before that describes a smaller, unlevered business. Owner earnings over that stretch ran from $2.21 to $4.30 a share, and we anchor on the median, about $3.93. The wide swing is almost entirely inventory: 2023's cash flow of $73.6 million looked strong only because $52.2 million of it was the post-pandemic inventory overbuild draining out of the warehouse, not new earnings. 2025 was the strongest of the four years on a clean basis, with gross margin improving to 40.9% of sales (from 39.4% in 2024) on tariff-related price increases and a growing mix of higher-margin direct-to-consumer sales. Two accounting points affect what you're seeing. First, owner earnings run well above reported net income because depreciation and amortization ($10-12 million a year, mostly the acquired customer-relationship intangibles from the 2021 deal) is far more than the $4-7 million actually needed to maintain the business. That gap is real cash, but the acquired intangibles are a wasting asset — a $4.0 million write-down against one of the acquired trademarks in 2024 is a reminder — so rather than lowering the earnings figure itself, which would double-count the decay, we've kept growth assumptions modest and let that erosion weigh most heavily on the downside case. Second, debt: Rocky has paid down $148 million since the 2021 deal, and interest expense fell from a $22.7 million peak in 2023 to $10.0 million in 2025. Because owner earnings are calculated after interest actually paid, this leverage is already inside the number. One new fact tempers how much further deleveraging to assume: in the first half of 2026, net debt fell only about $0.5 million, versus a historical pace of $6-8 million a year. We've pushed back the timeline for the company becoming debt-free rather than assuming the earlier pace continues. We also noticed, and could not fully explain from the information available to us, an unusually large jump in second-quarter 2026 gross margin (to roughly 51% of sales from 41% a year earlier) alongside a swing in quarterly net income from $1.3 million in the first quarter to $13.9 million in the second. We have not built this jump into the valuation, because we can't yet tell whether it reflects a durable pricing or mix shift or something more temporary — it's a fact to watch, not a number to bank. One more newly disclosed detail: a single customer now accounts for 15% of accounts receivable, where a year earlier no customer crossed that threshold. That doesn't by itself signal a problem, but it's a concentration that wasn't there before, and it factors into the downside case. The company is also mid-way through a multi-year overhaul of its financial systems, which carries its own execution risk while underway. Our base case assumes low-to-mid single-digit revenue growth, gross margin holding near current levels, and debt reduction resuming — later than we previously assumed — as the shift toward e-commerce and third-party marketplace sales, which already carry meaningfully higher margins than wholesale, continues. That's worth about $87 a share. Our bear case assumes the newly concentrated customer relationship deteriorates, tariff volatility continues, another acquired trademark is written down, and the debt paydown that stalled in early 2026 stays stalled through a downturn. Earnings decline for several years before settling near the level the business earned before the 2021 acquisition, adjusted for today's larger, more leveraged footprint. That's worth about $40 a share. Our bull case assumes the direct-to-consumer shift and tariff-related pricing power already visible in 2025's results keep compounding, and debt is eventually retired, freeing up the full $10 million of annual interest. We've been more conservative here than in our prior analysis: sustaining double-digit earnings growth for a full decade isn't something we can point to specific, dated evidence for at this company's scale, so we built the bull case from gains already demonstrated rather than extrapolating an aggressive growth rate indefinitely. That's worth about $125 a share — meaningfully below our prior estimate of $177, which we now think assumed more growth than the evidence supports. The margin-of-safety price is roughly $47 a share. Recent strength is not treated as the new normal until debt resumes its decline from actual earnings, there is no further write-down of the acquired trademarks, and it is clear that the strong first-half-2026 margin was not a one-time item.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 $4.30 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$16.3M; dWC=$(24.0)M (cash effect, positive = source of cash); SBC=$1.6M; capex=$6.6M, capex ratio=1.085%; revenue +$28.2M so growth capex=$0.3M and maintenance capex=$6.3M; OE=$32.4M; diluted shares=7.530M; OE/sh=$4.30. Best of the four post-acquisition years. Reconciliation is exact to the dollar for this year. Debt down to $122.6M and interest expense down to $10.0M from the $22.7M peak. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001437749-26-007634.
2024 $3.88 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$52.8M; dWC=$17.8M (cash effect, positive = source of cash); SBC=$1.3M; capex=$4.7M, revenue declined $8.0M so growth capex=$0 and maintenance capex=$4.7M; OE=$29.0M; diluted shares=7.480M; OE/sh=$3.88. A $4.0M write-down was taken against one of the acquired indefinite-lived trademarks; it is a non-cash charge already inside CFO and is correctly not deducted again. Working-capital movement is derived from the cash-flow identity for this year because the contract asset and contract liability lines carry the same figure double-tagged with opposite economic meaning; the direct tag sum gives $16.3M and the identity gives $17.8M, a $0.12 per share difference. Source: FY2024 10-K, accession 0001437749-25-008025.
2023 $2.21 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$73.6M; dWC=$52.2M (cash effect, positive = source of cash - almost all of it a large inventory liquidation as the post-pandemic overbuild unwound); SBC=$1.2M; capex=$3.9M, revenue declined $153.7M so growth capex=$0 and maintenance capex=$3.9M; OE=$16.3M; diluted shares=7.381M; OE/sh=$2.21. Weakest of the four post-acquisition years: the headline CFO of $73.6M is inventory release, not earnings, which is precisely what removing the working-capital movement strips out. Interest expense peaked at $22.7M. Source: FY2023 10-K, accession 0001437749-24-007987.
2022 $3.99 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$19.1M; dWC=$(17.1)M (cash effect, positive = source of cash); SBC=$1.2M; capex=$6.7M, capex ratio=1.085%; revenue +$101.3M so growth capex=$1.1M and maintenance capex=$5.6M; OE=$29.4M; diluted shares=7.369M; OE/sh=$3.99. First full year of the combined company; revenue peaks at $615.5M. Interest expense $18.3M. Source: FY2022 10-K, accession 0001437749-23-006169.
2021 $2.76 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(54.9)M; dWC=$(95.2)M (cash effect, positive = source of cash); SBC=$1.3M; capex=$21.1M, capex ratio=1.085%; revenue +$236.9M so growth capex=$2.6M and maintenance capex=$18.5M; OE=$20.5M; diluted shares=7.409M; OE/sh=$2.76. The year Rocky bought Honeywell's performance and lifestyle footwear business (Muck, XTRATUF, Servus, Ranger, Neos) for about $230M funded with debt, roughly doubling the company; debt went from zero to $270M. The reported CFO of negative $54.9M is almost entirely the working-capital movement, which mixes the acquired opening balance sheet with organic movement, so this year is not a clean reading and is excluded from the valuation anchor. Source: FY2021 10-K, accession 0001437749-22-006288.
2020 $2.01 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$31.4M; dWC=$4.2M (cash effect, positive = source of cash); SBC=$0.8M; capex=$11.7M, capex ratio=1.085%; revenue +$6.9M so growth capex=$0.1M and maintenance capex=$11.6M; OE=$14.8M; diluted shares=7.337M; OE/sh=$2.01. Last pre-acquisition year: revenue $277M, zero debt. Source: FY2020 10-K, accession 0001437749-21-006170.
2019 $1.79 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$18.1M; dWC=$(3.4)M (cash effect, positive = source of cash); SBC=$0.7M; capex=$7.7M, capex ratio=1.085% (mean capex/revenue over FY2022-FY2025); revenue +$17.7M so growth capex=$0.2M and maintenance capex=$7.5M; OE=$13.3M; diluted shares=7.439M; OE/sh=$1.79. Source: FY2019 10-K, accession 0000895456-20-000010.
2018 $1.86 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$17.6M; dWC=$(1.1)M (cash effect, positive = source of cash); SBC=$0.6M; capex=$4.2M, revenue declined $0.5M so growth capex=$0 and maintenance capex=$4.2M; OE=$13.9M; diluted shares=7.462M; OE/sh=$1.86. Pre-acquisition Rocky Brands. Source: FY2018 10-K, accession 0000895456-19-000017.
2017 $1.30 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$17.1M; dWC=$2.7M (cash effect, positive = source of cash); SBC=$0.4M; capex=$4.3M, revenue declined $7.1M so growth capex=$0 and maintenance capex=$4.3M; OE=$9.7M; diluted shares=7.450M; OE/sh=$1.30. Source: FY2017 10-K, accession 0000895456-18-000011.
2016 $0.20 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$21.3M; dWC=$13.5M (cash effect, positive = source of cash - a large inventory drawdown); SBC=$0.4M; capex=$5.9M, revenue declined $9.0M so growth capex=$0 and maintenance capex=$5.9M; OE=$1.5M; diluted shares=7.505M; OE/sh=$0.20. Pre-acquisition Rocky Brands: roughly half the current size, no debt. A $3.0M intangible impairment was taken this year. Source: FY2016 10-K, accession 0001144204-17-013522.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
Sales are booked almost entirely in the United States (wholesale to national retailers, direct-to-consumer e-commerce/marketplaces, and U.S. military/government exchange channels such as AAFES); the company discloses no material separate international sales segment despite manufacturing/sourcing footprints in Vietnam, China, the Dominican Republic, Cambodia, Puerto Rico, India, and Mexico.
Historical growth strategy

We don't have historical growth strategy information for this company yet.

Chart analysis

We don't have chart analysis for this company yet.

Competitors

We don't have competitor information for this company yet.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.