valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$8.00 ComplexityHigh Updated
$1.20 $36.27
bear $1.20 base $14.75 bull $36.27 margin of safety $8.00 market price* $19.36
Business condition attached to the margin of safety The post-divestiture company reports at least two consecutive quarters of positive operating cash flow before working-capital changes, showing that memorialization cash is covering corporate costs, Industrial Technologies losses and interest once the taxes on the 2025-2026 business sales have been paid.
Matthews International is now mostly a memorialization company. Its core business makes bronze grave markers and memorials, caskets, cremation equipment and, since its acquisition of The Dodge Company, embalming chemicals and funeral-home supplies. That segment earned about $130 million of segment cash profit (before depreciation, interest and tax) in the nine months to June 2026, a little ahead of the prior year, and it is the reason the company has value. Over the last eighteen months Matthews sold its SGK brand-packaging business into a joint venture called Propelis (May 2025, keeping a 40% stake plus $27.5 million of preferred equity), then sold its warehouse automation business and its European packaging businesses (late 2025). What remains outside memorialization is a smaller Industrial Technologies segment (product marking and coding, engineering, and dry-battery-electrode equipment for energy storage) that lost about $13 million at the segment level in the nine months to June 2026, plus corporate costs of roughly $45 million a year. Cash history: before these sales, Matthews produced about $2.30 to $3.30 a share of owner earnings from 2016 to 2021, then much less: $0.67 in 2022, $1.61 in 2023, $0.03 in 2024 and minus $1.19 in fiscal 2025. Those years include businesses that are now gone, so we did not use the old average as the starting point. Instead we built today's business from its parts: memorialization at about $172 million a year, Industrial Technologies at a loss of $20 million falling to $5 million, corporate costs of $45 million, and then the costs that the company's own "adjusted" profit leaves out but that come back every year. Those are about $15 million of restructuring and integration charges (charges of this kind appear in every recent year's filings), $18 million of stock-based pay and $18 million of capital spending, plus about $8 million of tax. That gives roughly $63 million a year of cash before interest, about $2.00 a share. We treat the Propelis stake as an investment rather than a cash stream, because Propelis does not pay Matthews regular cash. We count the $65.6 million of receivables Matthews has sold with recourse as debt. Fiscal 2025 pre-interest cash fell 72%, from $51 million to $14 million. Our base case starts lower than our steady level, at $33 million in year one. It only recovers because of specific items: the $8.9 million of sale costs and $5.1 million proxy-contest cost do not repeat; Tesla legal costs ($18.9 million in nine months) should fall after the arbitration ruling confirmed Matthews' right to sell its electrode equipment; and a $10 million European engineering cost cut has been announced. We could not tell from the filings how much of the $69.5 million operating cash outflow in the first nine months of fiscal 2026 was tax on the sale gains, so recent cash flow could not be fully reconciled. What it owes: debt of $567.3 million less $37.6 million of cash, plus the $65.6 million of sold receivables, is $595.3 million. After paying off its 8.625% notes, the main debt is a bank revolver due January 2029 that costs around 7%. That premium adds roughly $16 million, for $611 million in all. The receivables facility runs to April 2027. Bear case ($1.20): Memorialization slips to $155 million as casket and memorial volumes keep falling with fewer deaths and more cremation. Industrial Technologies loses $20 million a year for three years, carries a $15 million exit cost and is then closed. Tesla costs run $20 million a year for two more years. The 2029 refinancing comes at about 9%, which adds $72 million to the debt cost. Cash then fades 2% a year. The business is worth $678 million and the Propelis common stake is worth nothing, leaving just its $27.5 million preferred. Against $667 million owed, about $38 million is left for shareholders. In this case cash covers interest only from year four, so there is little room for error. Base case ($14.75): Memorialization holds at $172 million, Industrial Technologies trims its losses to $5 million, and Tesla costs fade over two years. After year ten, cash declines 1% a year as cremation keeps eroding casket volume. The business is worth $924 million. With Propelis at $150 million, less than its $224 million book value because it is losing money and running behind on its savings targets, and $611 million owed, shareholders keep $463 million. Bull case ($36.27): Memorialization reaches $180 million through the price increases it has shown in 2025 and 2026 and the Dodge integration. Industrial Technologies earns $15 million from electrode equipment orders now that the arbitration has cleared the way and delayed customer projects proceed. Corporate costs drop to $40 million, and cash then holds level. The business is worth $1.52 billion; adding Propelis at book value and subtracting $611 million owed leaves $1.14 billion. Change since our last analysis: our earlier estimate (bear -$17.62, base -$7.64, bull $21.37) took the debt off cash flows that had already paid interest on it, so it counted the debt twice, and it used higher discount rates. We now value the business before its lenders at a flat 6% and subtract the debt once. The debt has also fallen by about $144 million since September 2025, paid down with the sale proceeds. Our view of how much cash the business earns is actually lower than before. What would make this wrong: Matthews recorded goodwill or asset write-downs in five of the last seven fiscal years, and its adjusted profit has regularly overstated cash. If cash from operations stays negative once the sale-related taxes are paid, the base case is too high.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 -$1.19 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=-$23.6M; ΔWC=$45.4M cash used, added back (IncreaseDecreaseInOperatingCapital +45.4M); SBC=$23.1M; capex=$35.8M, growth capex=$0 (revenue declined), so maintenance capex=$35.8M; OE=-$37.0M; diluted shares=31.098M; OE/sh=-$1.19. Revenue=$1,497.6M. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0000063296-25-000070. Includes SGK Business only to 5/1/2025; FY2025 revenue = segment sales $809.5M+$342.2M+$345.9M. CFO depressed by Tesla litigation costs ($22.2M), SGK divestiture costs and taxes. ΔWC sign verified against FY2025 cash-flow statement ('Changes in working capital items' (45,394) = cash used). Residual vs NI+D&A+impairments+deferred tax−gains−maint capex is explained by pension settlement/contribution, divestiture-cost and other non-current asset/liability lines that CFO captures.
2024 $0.03 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$79.3M; ΔWC=$14.7M cash released, removed (IncreaseDecreaseInOperatingCapital -14.7M); SBC=$18.5M; capex=$45.2M, growth capex=$0 (revenue declined), so maintenance capex=$45.2M; OE=$0.9M; diluted shares=30.913M; OE/sh=$0.03. Revenue=$1,795.7M. Source: FY2024 10-K, accession 0000063296-24-000094. Later restated figures used where filings differ. ΔWC sign verified against FY2025 cash-flow statement ('Changes in working capital items' (45,394) = cash used). Residual vs NI+D&A+impairments+deferred tax−gains−maint capex is explained by pension settlement/contribution, divestiture-cost and other non-current asset/liability lines that CFO captures.
2023 $1.61 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$79.5M; ΔWC=$35.5M cash used, added back (IncreaseDecreaseInOperatingCapital +35.5M); SBC=$17.3M; capex=$50.6M, growth capex=$3.1M (capex/revenue avg 2.64% × revenue change $+118.5M), so maintenance capex=$47.5M; OE=$50.2M; diluted shares=31.289M; OE/sh=$1.61. Revenue=$1,880.9M. Source: FY2023 10-K, accession 0000063296-23-000103. Later restated figures used where filings differ. ΔWC sign verified against FY2025 cash-flow statement ('Changes in working capital items' (45,394) = cash used). Residual vs NI+D&A+impairments+deferred tax−gains−maint capex is explained by pension settlement/contribution, divestiture-cost and other non-current asset/liability lines that CFO captures.
2022 $0.67 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$126.9M; ΔWC=$29.6M cash released, removed (IncreaseDecreaseInOperatingCapital -29.6M); SBC=$17.4M; capex=$61.3M, growth capex=$2.4M (capex/revenue avg 2.64% × revenue change $+91.4M), so maintenance capex=$58.9M; OE=$20.9M; diluted shares=31.367M; OE/sh=$0.67. Revenue=$1,762.4M. Source: FY2022 10-K, accession 0000063296-22-000099. Later restated figures used where filings differ. ΔWC sign verified against FY2025 cash-flow statement ('Changes in working capital items' (45,394) = cash used). Residual vs NI+D&A+impairments+deferred tax−gains−maint capex is explained by pension settlement/contribution, divestiture-cost and other non-current asset/liability lines that CFO captures.
2021 $3.27 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$162.8M; ΔWC=$13.0M cash released, removed (IncreaseDecreaseInOperatingCapital -13.0M); SBC=$15.6M; capex=$34.3M, growth capex=$4.6M (capex/revenue avg 2.64% × revenue change $+172.7M), so maintenance capex=$29.8M; OE=$104.5M; diluted shares=31.987M; OE/sh=$3.27. Revenue=$1,671.0M. Source: FY2021 10-K, accession 0000063296-21-000107. ΔWC sign verified against FY2025 cash-flow statement ('Changes in working capital items' (45,394) = cash used). Residual vs NI+D&A+impairments+deferred tax−gains−maint capex is explained by pension settlement/contribution, divestiture-cost and other non-current asset/liability lines that CFO captures.
2020 $2.92 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$180.4M; ΔWC=$46.4M cash released, removed (IncreaseDecreaseInOperatingCapital -46.4M); SBC=$8.1M; capex=$34.8M, growth capex=$0 (revenue declined), so maintenance capex=$34.8M; OE=$91.1M; diluted shares=31.190M; OE/sh=$2.92. Revenue=$1,498.3M. Source: FY2020 10-K, accession 0000063296-20-000098. ΔWC sign verified against FY2025 cash-flow statement ('Changes in working capital items' (45,394) = cash used). Residual vs NI+D&A+impairments+deferred tax−gains−maint capex is explained by pension settlement/contribution, divestiture-cost and other non-current asset/liability lines that CFO captures.
2019 $3.12 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$131.1M; ΔWC=$12.5M cash used, added back (IncreaseDecreaseInOperatingCapital +12.5M); SBC=$7.7M; capex=$37.7M, growth capex=$0 (revenue declined), so maintenance capex=$37.7M; OE=$98.1M; diluted shares=31.416M; OE/sh=$3.12. Revenue=$1,537.3M. Source: FY2019 10-K, accession 0000063296-19-000119. ΔWC sign verified against FY2025 cash-flow statement ('Changes in working capital items' (45,394) = cash used). Residual vs NI+D&A+impairments+deferred tax−gains−maint capex is explained by pension settlement/contribution, divestiture-cost and other non-current asset/liability lines that CFO captures.
2018 $3.24 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$147.6M; ΔWC=$9.9M cash used, added back (IncreaseDecreaseInOperatingCapital +9.9M); SBC=$13.5M; capex=$43.2M, growth capex=$2.3M (capex/revenue avg 2.64% × revenue change $+87.0M), so maintenance capex=$40.9M; OE=$103.1M; diluted shares=31.861M; OE/sh=$3.24. Revenue=$1,602.6M. Source: FY2018 10-K, accession 0000063296-18-000124. ΔWC sign verified against FY2025 cash-flow statement ('Changes in working capital items' (45,394) = cash used). Residual vs NI+D&A+impairments+deferred tax−gains−maint capex is explained by pension settlement/contribution, divestiture-cost and other non-current asset/liability lines that CFO captures.
2017 $2.61 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$149.3M; ΔWC=$5.8M cash released, removed (IncreaseDecreaseInOperatingCapital -5.8M); SBC=$14.6M; capex=$44.9M, growth capex=$0.9M (capex/revenue avg 2.64% × revenue change $+35.1M), so maintenance capex=$44.0M; OE=$84.9M; diluted shares=32.570M; OE/sh=$2.61. Revenue=$1,515.6M. Source: FY2017 10-K, accession 0000063296-17-000098. ΔWC sign verified against FY2025 cash-flow statement ('Changes in working capital items' (45,394) = cash used). Residual vs NI+D&A+impairments+deferred tax−gains−maint capex is explained by pension settlement/contribution, divestiture-cost and other non-current asset/liability lines that CFO captures.
2016 $2.30 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivitiesContinuingOperations)=$140.3M; ΔWC=$13.7M cash released, removed (IncreaseDecreaseInOperatingCapital -13.7M); SBC=$10.6M; capex=$41.7M, growth capex=$1.4M (capex/revenue avg 2.64% × revenue change $+54.4M), so maintenance capex=$40.2M; OE=$75.7M; diluted shares=32.904M; OE/sh=$2.30. Revenue=$1,480.5M. Source: FY2016 10-K, accession 0000063296-16-000200. ΔWC sign verified against FY2025 cash-flow statement ('Changes in working capital items' (45,394) = cash used). Residual vs NI+D&A+impairments+deferred tax−gains−maint capex is explained by pension settlement/contribution, divestiture-cost and other non-current asset/liability lines that CFO captures.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
Primarily the United States (Northeast, Midwest, South and West) and Canada, with the remainder mainly in Europe (Germany, Italy, United Kingdom) and smaller amounts in Asia-Pacific (Australia).
Historical growth strategy
Growth has come mainly from acquisitions funded with debt (the SGK brand business in 2014, Aurora Casket in 2015 and many smaller memorialization and engineering deals, most recently The Dodge Company), combined with steady price increases in memorialization. Since 2025 the strategy has reversed: it has been selling non-core businesses (SGK into the Propelis joint venture, warehouse automation, European packaging) to pay down debt and concentrate on memorialization.
Chart analysis
A chartist would see a long downtrend of lower highs: the shares peaked in the $60s in 2016-2017, fell to the high teens in the 2020 sell-off, rallied to around $40-45 in 2023, then broke back down to the low $20s and high teens through 2024-2025. Repeated tests of the high-teens zone have so far held as support, forming a broad base, while the $28-30 area has capped rallies. Until price clears that resistance, the chart reads as a range-bound stock inside a longer-term downtrend.
Competitors

Companies we consider competitors of MATW. Tap a ticker to open our analysis of that company in a new tab.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.