valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

AGIOS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (AGIO) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$6.00 ComplexityHigh Updated
$5.00 $26.00
bear $5.00 base $14.00 bull $26.00 margin of safety $6.00 market price* $31.32
Business condition attached to the margin of safety Quarterly product revenue from PYRUKYND/AQVESME running well above the first-half 2026 pace (about $45 million in Q2 2026) for two or more consecutive quarters, with cash burn visibly narrowing.
Agios Pharmaceuticals is a Cambridge, Massachusetts drug developer built around one molecule, mitapivat, an oral drug that activates an enzyme in red blood cells. It is sold as PYRUKYND for pyruvate kinase (PK) deficiency, and as AQVESME for alpha- and beta-thalassemia, launched in the United States in late 2025 (also approved in Saudi Arabia; the European Commission was reviewing a positive CHMP opinion at the time of the 10-K). Sickle cell disease is still in development. Agios sold its oncology business earlier (2021 and 2024), so the large net profits in those years were one-time sale gains, not earnings from operations. What the business earns today: nothing. Cash from operations was negative every year we measured, from about -$290 million to -$410 million annually (2019-2025), and after subtracting stock compensation (about $50-60 million a year) our owner-earnings figure is roughly -$6 to -$8 per share every year. There is no positive earnings level to capitalise, so we do not credit one. Product revenue was $54 million in 2025 and $65 million in the first half of 2026 (Q2 2026: $44.7 million), a real step up after the thalassemia launch, but operating costs run several times that. Two dated facts matter: the company held about $1.2 billion in cash and securities at December 31, 2025, and it burned about $176 million in the first half of 2026, leaving roughly $1.0 billion, or about $17 per share, and there is no going-concern warning in the annual report. The filings do not show how quickly launch revenue can grow past the cost base, so growth from the thalassemia launch, a sickle cell approval, or European sales is not credited beyond what has been reported. Bear case (about $5 per share): the launch plateaus near the current pace, spending stays near $350-400 million a year, and roughly half the cash is consumed before management cuts the research budget and the remaining product revenue (Pyrukynd and Aqvesme are single-molecule, so concentration is total) covers a much smaller cost base. Shareholders keep the remaining cash and little else. Base case (about $14 per share): current revenue keeps growing modestly on the approved indications already launched, spending gradually narrows the gap, and roughly $3 per share of cash is used up before the business approaches self-funding. The value is mostly the cash pile, plus a small value for the marketed drug. Bull case (about $26 per share): the U.S. thalassemia launch, on a diagnosed population of 18,000-23,000 patients, converts at the strong pace seen in the second quarter of 2026, product revenue reaches a scale that covers most operating costs within a few years, and the drug generates positive owner earnings that are worth roughly a decade of cash flow beyond the remaining cash. What would make this wrong: a rapid, sustained launch beyond our bull case, or a clinical/regulatory setback (sickle cell) or slower prescriptions that accelerate the burn. Because the company is loss-making, the shares carry heavy risk of dilution if funding is needed after the cash is spent. We only looked at cash and filed operating results, and did not include any share-price view. Working-capital movements were not separately tagged in the filings, so they remain inside operating cash flow.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 -$7.41 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(373.0)M; SBC=$52.6M; capex=$4.3M; dWC not separately tagged. OE=$(429.8)M; diluted shares=58.0M; OE/sh=$(7.41). Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001439222-26-000025.
2024 -$7.50 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(389.8)M; SBC=$42.8M; capex=$1.7M; dWC not separately tagged. OE=$(434.4)M; diluted shares=57.9M; OE/sh=$(7.50). Net income $674M in 2024 was a one-off sale gain. Source: FY2024 10-K, accession 0001439222-25-000009.
2023 -$6.14 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(296.1)M; SBC=$44.8M; capex=$1.0M; dWC not separately tagged. OE=$(341.8)M; diluted shares=55.7M; OE/sh=$(6.14). Source: FY2023 10-K, accession 0001439222-24-000035.
2022 -$6.64 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(309.5)M; SBC=$49.3M; capex=$4.9M; dWC not separately tagged. OE=$(363.7)M; diluted shares=54.8M; OE/sh=$(6.64). Source: FY2022 10-K, accession 0001439222-23-000039.
2021 -$7.72 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(407.3)M; SBC=$53.5M; capex=$5.7M; dWC not separately tagged. OE=$(466.6)M; diluted shares=60.4M; OE/sh=$(7.72). Net income $1.6B in 2021 was a one-off oncology sale gain, not in CFO. Source: FY2021 10-K, accession 0001439222-22-000024.
2020 -$5.31 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(290.8)M; SBC=$61.6M; capex=$14.1M treated as maintenance; dWC not separately tagged. OE=$(366.5)M; diluted shares=69.0M; OE/sh=$(5.31). Source: FY2020 10-K, accession 0001439222-21-000029.
2019 -$7.35 ▼
OE = CFO - dWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(370.6)M; SBC=$58.1M; capex=$12.0M treated as maintenance (growth capex immaterial); dWC not separately tagged, left inside CFO. OE=$(440.7)M; diluted shares=60.0M; OE/sh=$(7.35). Source: XBRL FY2019 10-K figures; FY2025 10-K accession 0001439222-26-000025 for filing series.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
United States (national); Saudi Arabia; European Union and other markets pending regulatory approval
Historical growth strategy

We don't have historical growth strategy information for this company yet.

Chart analysis

We don't have chart analysis for this company yet.

Competitors

We don't have competitor information for this company yet.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.