valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

Texas Pacific Land Corp (TPL) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$96.00 ComplexityAverage Updated
$80.95 $244.77
bear $80.95 base $156.91 bull $244.77 margin of safety $96.00 market price* $350.92
Texas Pacific Land Corporation owns roughly 880,000 acres of land plus a large book of oil-and-gas royalty interests, almost all concentrated in the Permian Basin of West Texas and southeastern New Mexico. It is not an oil and gas producer — other companies pay to drill and produce on land TPL owns or under royalty interests it holds, and TPL collects a percentage of the resulting revenue without spending anything on drilling itself. Alongside this royalty stream, TPL sells and sources water used in drilling and disposes of the water that comes back up with the oil (produced water), and periodically sells surface acreage or grants easements (for pipelines, power lines, etc.) across its land. Three cases In a downturn case, modeled on the actual 2020 shock (oil prices collapsed and TPL's per-share owner earnings fell by roughly 40% that year), near-term earnings decline sharply as operators pull back drilling and completions, before stabilizing at a lower, more muted level of Permian activity for the following decade. The larger, less commodity-sensitive water business — which barely existed in 2020 and now accounts for about a fifth of revenue — provides a partial offset versus the last downturn. In the case we view as most likely, recent activity levels continue: modest further royalty-interest purchases funded from the company's own cash flow (as it has done almost every year, without ever needing to borrow), a still-growing but decelerating water business, and production volumes that keep growing somewhat faster than the region's rig count because operators have become steadily more efficient at completing wells. Growth tapers over the decade as the acreage base matures. In the upside case, the pace of royalty-interest acquisitions and water-business expansion seen in 2024-2025 continues for several more years before decelerating, supported by a newly arranged $500 million line of credit that gives the company room to keep buying without diluting shareholders. Beyond the ten-year horizon we assume earnings simply continue at whatever level each case reaches, without further growth assumed. TPL owns this land outright with essentially no cost of upkeep, and the Permian Basin has a long remaining production life, so the case for the royalty stream persisting indefinitely at a flat level, rather than declining, rests on the durability of the underlying land ownership rather than on any specific new growth driver. One fact worth flagging: 2025 illustrated how resilient this model can be — the average number of drilling rigs working the Permian fell about 13% year over year, yet TPL's own royalty production volumes still grew about 29%, because operators completed wells more efficiently and TPL kept adding to its royalty acreage. The flip side is that the inventory of drilled-but-not-yet-completed wells in the basin — the backlog that feeds near-term production — also fell about 13% in 2025, which is worth watching as a signal for whether that volume growth continues. TPL carries no debt. It signed a new $500 million revolving credit line in October 2025 that remained completely undrawn at year end — it exists as flexibility to fund further acquisitions, not as a financing need. That means our estimate of what the business is worth translates directly into a per-share value without any subtraction for debt. Because a real share of TPL's revenue still depends on oil and gas prices and on decisions by drilling operators TPL doesn't control, the margin-of-safety price is set meaningfully below our estimate of what the business is worth, to allow for a period like 2020 repeating. Accounting note: depreciation and the amortization of past acquisitions are added back in full when computing owner earnings (as they are non-cash), while only the portion of capital spending needed to sustain the existing business — not the discretionary spending on new royalty and land acquisitions used to grow it — is subtracted from owner earnings.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 $7.19 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$545,910K; ΔWC=$(19,896)K; SBC=$15,131K; deferred taxes +$6,555K and amortization of new debt-issuance costs +$211K (Wells Fargo-led $500M revolving credit facility entered Oct 23 2025, undrawn at year-end). Capex ('purchase of fixed assets', primarily water infrastructure)=$59,531K; revenue grew to $798,190K from $705,823K; growth capex=5.6%x$92,367K=$5,164K; maintenance capex=$59,531K-$5,164K=$54,367K. OE=$545,910-(-19,896)-15,131-54,367=$496,308K. This excludes $454,244K of royalty-interest acquisitions and $35,951K of real-estate acquisitions during the year, treated as discretionary growth investment rather than a cost of maintaining current earning power. Diluted shares=69,027,492 (post the Dec 22, 2025 3-for-1 split). OE/sh=$7.19. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001811074-26-000018.
2024 $6.57 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$490,672K; ΔWC=$(936)K; SBC=$12,498K; pension curtailment/settlement gain -$4,616K and deferred taxes +$4,604K (both non-cash, net effect embedded in CFO). Capex=$29,696K; revenue grew to $705,823K from $631,595K; growth capex=5.6%x$74,228K=$4,150K; maintenance capex=$29,696K-$4,150K=$25,546K. OE=$490,672-(-936)-12,498-25,546=$453,564K. Diluted shares (current basis, restated in FY2025 10-K for both splits)=69,059,252. OE/sh=$6.57 (matches GAAP diluted EPS of $6.57 exactly). Sources: FY2024 10-K accession 0001811074-25-000044 (headline); FY2025 10-K accession 0001811074-26-000018 (WC/non-cash detail, share count).
2023 $5.88 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$418,288K; ΔWC=$(13,856)K (receivables/other assets -$24,457K, prepaid income taxes +$4,809K, income taxes payable +$1,628K, unearned revenue +$5,140K, other operating liabilities -$3,240K, ad valorem taxes payable +$2,264K); SBC=$10,343K; deferred taxes +$1,399K (non-cash, embedded in CFO, not separately added/subtracted here). Capex ('purchase of fixed assets')=$15,028K; revenue declined slightly to $631,595K from $667,422K so growth capex=$0, maintenance capex=full $15,028K. OE=$418,288-(-13,856)-10,343-15,028=$406,773K. Diluted shares (current basis, post both splits, as restated in the FY2025 10-K)=69,179,535. OE/sh=$5.88 (cross-checks closely to GAAP diluted EPS of $5.86). Sources: FY2023 10-K accession 0001811074-24-000015 (headline CFO/NI); FY2025 10-K accession 0001811074-26-000018 (working-capital detail and split-adjusted share count).
2022 $6.54 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$447,149K; ΔWC=$(23,021)K; SBC=$8,432K; capex=$18,967K. Revenue grew to $667,422K from $450,958K (a commodity price-spike year, WTI averaged roughly $95); growth capex=5.6%x$216,464K=$12,102K; maintenance capex=$18,967K-$12,102K=$6,865K. OE=$447,149-(-23,021)-8,432-6,865=$454,873K. Diluted shares (current basis, x9 of the then-reported 7,726,809)=69,541,281. OE/sh=$6.54. Note: 2022 benefited from an extraordinary, largely non-recurring commodity price spike; retained in the anchor window as the cyclical upswing counterpart to the FY2020 trough. Source: FY2022 10-K, accession 0001811074-23-000014.
2021 $3.99 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$265,163K; ΔWC=$(21,102)K; SBC=$28K (first year of grants); capex=$16,415K. Revenue grew to $450,958K from $302,564K; growth capex=5.6%x$148,394K=$8,296K; maintenance capex=$16,415K-$8,296K=$8,119K. OE=$265,163-(-21,102)-28-8,119=$278,118K. Diluted shares (current basis, x9)=69,768,486. OE/sh=$3.99. Source: FY2021 10-K, accession 0001811074-22-000014.
2020 $2.66 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$207,037K; ΔWC=$16,593K; SBC=$0; capex=$5,086K. Revenue declined to $302,564K from $490,496K (COVID demand/price shock, the disclosed commodity trough of the period), so growth capex=$0 and maintenance capex=full $5,086K. OE=$207,037-16,593-0-5,086=$185,358K. Diluted shares (current basis, x9)=69,805,404. OE/sh=$2.66. This is the cyclical trough year used to calibrate the bear case. Source: FY2020 10-K, accession 0001811074-21-000013.
2019 $4.38 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$342,790K; ΔWC=$15,156K (net WC release added cash; removing it reduces OE); SBC=$0; capex=$32,209K. Revenue grew from $300,220K (2018) to $490,496K (2019); capex/revenue ratio (mean ≈5.6% over FY2018-2025) applied: growth capex=5.6%x$190,276K=$10,638K; maintenance capex=$32,209K-$10,638K=$21,571K. OE=$342,790-15,156-0-21,571=$306,063K. Diluted shares (current basis, x9)=69,807,933. OE/sh=$4.38. Source: FY2020 10-K, accession 0001811074-21-000013, FY2019 comparative column.
2018 $2.35 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$195,448K; ΔWC=$(16,871)K (net WC cash outflow this year; removing it reduces OE); SBC=$0 (pre-grant era); capex (purchase of fixed assets)=$47,878K. No FY2017 revenue available to split growth vs. maintenance capex, so the full amount is conservatively treated as maintenance capex (may understate OE for this single year). OE=$195,448-(-16,871)-0-47,878=$164,441K. Diluted shares restated to current basis (after both 3-for-1 splits, Mar 26 2024 and Dec 22 2025, i.e. 9x the originally reported count)=70,086,663 (7,787,407 x9). OE/sh=$2.35. Source: FY2020 10-K, accession 0001811074-21-000013, FY2018 comparative column.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
United States — South (primarily West Texas: Permian Basin / Delaware sub-basin counties such as Reeves, Culberson, Loving, Winkler, Ward and Pecos) with a smaller portion in West (southeastern New Mexico).
Historical growth strategy

We don't have historical growth strategy information for this company yet.

Chart analysis
A chartist looking at TPL's price history would note a powerful, multi-year uptrend interrupted by sharp, double-digit-percentage drawdowns that closely track swings in oil prices and market sentiment toward energy — a classic high-beta growth pattern layered on top of a commodity-linked business. The historically low share count made the stock prone to large single-day moves on earnings or oil-price news. Management's two recent stock splits (three-for-one in March 2024 and again in December 2025) reduced the nominal share price and increased the number of shares outstanding. Pullbacks have tended to be sharp but have historically been followed by new highs as the underlying business kept growing.
Competitors

We don't have competitor information for this company yet.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.