valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

Tango Therapeutics, Inc. (TNGX) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$0.55 ComplexityHigh Updated
$0.94 $1.18
bear $0.94 base $1.01 bull $1.18 margin of safety $0.55 market price* $22.04
Business condition attached to the margin of safety Positive, reproducible clinical data for vopimetostat or TNG260 (or a new licensing/partnership agreement on favorable terms) that lets real, evidenced pipeline value be credited instead of treating the shares as a slowly-spent cash pile.
Tango Therapeutics is a clinical-stage oncology company developing drugs based on synthetic lethality - targeting cancer cells that have lost a specific gene by attacking the backup pathway they now depend on. Its two clinically active programs are vopimetostat (a PRMT5 inhibitor) and TNG260 (a CoREST inhibitor); the company discontinued its most advanced program, TNG908, in November 2024 after trial data showed the drug did not reach effective concentrations in the brain, and also discontinued a second program, TNG348. Several other candidates remain in earlier, preclinical development. For years the company partnered with Gilead Sciences, which paid a total of $199 million in upfront and milestone payments starting in 2018. That money was recognized as revenue gradually, as research work was performed. In the third quarter of 2025, the research phase of the Gilead collaboration ended; the $53.8 million not yet recognized was booked as revenue all at once. Tango now has no further research obligations to Gilead, and results reported since then confirm no further collaboration revenue is coming - the business is effectively pre-revenue going forward, funding its own research from its cash. That cash position is substantial: as of the most recent quarter, the company held just over $1.0 billion in cash and short-term investments, with no debt. Against that, the business is spending roughly $220 million a year once the one-time Gilead item is excluded, funding two mid-stage clinical programs and earlier research. Because we only assign value to things that are already secured or proven - not to the hope that an early or mid-stage cancer drug eventually wins approval - our valuation gives no dollar credit to the pipeline succeeding. TNG908's failure on a basic pharmacology measure (getting enough drug into the brain) after already clearing FDA review is a reminder of how much can still go wrong even once a drug reaches the clinic. Instead, the three cases below differ only in how fast the company's cash is spent: - Bear case ($0.94/share): spending keeps growing at roughly its recent historical pace (about 10% a year) as remaining programs advance into costlier later-stage trials, exhausting the cash pile in a little over three years, after which no further value is assumed. - Base case ($1.01/share): spending holds near its current annualized level for a few years, then eases moderately - consistent with the company's demonstrated willingness to cut underperforming programs - but the cash still runs out within the ten-year window. - Bull case ($1.18/share): the company narrows its pipeline further and reduces spending meaningfully, extending its cash runway the longest of the three cases. In every case, once the cash is spent, we assume nothing further is worth counting unless a program has actually produced an approved, revenue-generating drug - none has yet. The company carries no debt, so shareholders bear no leverage risk; essentially all of today's estimated value is the cash on the balance sheet, discounted for the pace at which it is likely to be spent down. This is a deliberately conservative view. If vopimetostat, TNG260, or an earlier-stage program produces convincing clinical data, or the company signs a new partnership on favorable terms, the shares could be worth meaningfully more than shown here - but that value can't be put a number on today, so it has been left out rather than guessed at. We would revisit this case if either of those things happens. Given how much of the outcome depends on spending discipline that can only be confirmed over time, the margin-of-safety price is set at a considerable discount to even the bear-case estimate.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 -$0.85 ▼
OE=CFO-deltaWC-SBC-maintenance capex, reconciled line-by-line to FY2025 10-K cash flow statement (accession 0001193125-26-092518), ties exactly to net cash used in operating activities of $(138,886)K. Net loss=$(101,594)K; +Depreciation $2,281K; +Noncash operating lease expense $3,961K; +Accretion on marketable securities $(2,688)K; +Other net $(77)K = $(98,117)K. Capex=$1,048K, treated fully as maintenance. OE=$(98,117)K-$1,048K=$(99,165)K. Diluted shares=116,166,187. OE/sh=$(0.85) as reported. IMPORTANT DISTORTION: this figure includes a one-time, non-recurring $53.8 million collaboration-revenue catch-up recognized in Q3 2025 when the Gilead research collaboration was truncated (10-K: 'the remaining unrecognized deferred revenue balance at the time of truncating the collaboration agreement of $53.8 million was recognized as revenue in the third quarter of 2025... The Company has no future research obligations'). Removing that one-time, non-repeatable item (net loss adjusted to $(155,394)K) gives a normalized OE of $(152,965)K, or $(1.32)/share, which is the figure used as the FY2025 data point in the DCF anchor and growth-path analysis, since the $53.8M will not recur (2026 H1 actual collaboration revenue = $0, confirming the underlying business is now effectively pre-revenue).
2024 -$1.18 ▼
OE=CFO-deltaWC-SBC-maintenance capex, reconciled line-by-line to the FY2025 10-K cash flow statement (accession 0001193125-26-092518), ties exactly to net cash used in operating activities of $(131,501)K. Net loss=$(130,302)K; +Depreciation $2,499K; +Noncash operating lease expense $3,745K; +Accretion on marketable securities $(4,617)K; +Other net $23K = $(128,652)K. Capex=$754K, treated fully as maintenance. OE=$(128,652)K-$754K=$(129,406)K. Diluted shares=109,226,731. OE/sh=$(1.18). Source: FY2024 10-K, accession 0000950170-25-028353.
2023 -$1.06 ▼
OE=CFO-deltaWC-SBC-maintenance capex, reconciled line-by-line to the FY2025 10-K cash flow statement (accession 0001193125-26-092518), ties exactly to net cash used in operating activities of $(117,982)K. Net loss=$(101,744)K; +Depreciation $2,415K; +Noncash operating lease expense $3,606K; +Accretion on marketable securities $(3,394)K; +Other net $22K = $(99,095)K. Capex=$1,526K, treated fully as maintenance capex (same rationale as prior years - lab/office capex not linked to revenue). OE=$(99,095)K-$1,526K=$(100,621)K. Diluted shares=94,572,448. OE/sh=$(1.06). Source: FY2023 10-K, accession 0000950170-24-032516.
2022 -$1.28 ▼
OE=CFO-deltaWC-SBC-maintenance capex, reconciled to FY2023 10-K comparative cash flow statement (accession 0000950170-24-032516) which ties exactly to net cash used in operating activities of $(109,080)K. Net loss=$(108,176)K; +Depreciation $1,608K; +Noncash operating lease expense $2,420K; +Other net $(669)K = $(104,817)K (no accretion line existed yet in 2022). Capex=$7,692K; revenue swings this year were driven by Gilead deferred-revenue amortization, not organic growth, so no growth-capex carve-out was applied (all capex treated as maintenance, lab equipment/leasehold improvements are not a function of revenue for a pre-commercial biotech). OE=$(104,817)K-$7,692K=$(112,509)K. Diluted shares (basic=diluted, net loss)=87,820,037. OE/sh=$(1.28). Source: FY2022 10-K, accession 0000950170-23-009854.
2021 -$0.93 ▼
OE = CFO - deltaWC - SBC - maintenance capex, reconciled line-by-line to FY2021 10-K cash flow statement (accession 0000950170-22-004721). Net loss=$(58,235)K; +Depreciation $897K; +Noncash operating lease expense $1,069K; +Other net $254K = $(56,015)K (this equals CFO of $(59,527)K plus SBC $7,833K minus deltaWC of $(12,042)K [deferred revenue drawdown from the 2018/Amended Gilead upfront payments], confirming CFO-DeltaWC-SBC = NI+non-cash addbacks). Maintenance capex = total capex $1,837K (revenue was rising off a small base and capex is lab equipment/leasehold improvement unrelated to revenue scale, so no growth-capex carve-out applied). OE = $(56,015)K - $1,837K = $(57,852)K. Diluted shares (basic=diluted, net loss) = 62,108,032. OE/sh = $(0.93).

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
Pre-revenue clinical-stage biotech; all historical collaboration revenue came from Gilead Sciences, a U.S. partner, and is now fully recognized with no ongoing research funding going forward.
Historical growth strategy

We don't have historical growth strategy information for this company yet.

Chart analysis
Tango came public via a SPAC merger in 2022, and like most clinical-stage biotechs that list this way, the chart likely shows a steep, prolonged decline from its opening levels over the following couple of years as early enthusiasm faded against continued cash burn with no product yet to show for it. Price gaps would be expected around clinical data releases and financing news - upside gaps on encouraging results, downside gaps on setbacks, including the November 2024 discontinuation of its lead brain-penetrant program. A chartist would likely describe the stock as range-bound and news-driven rather than trending, with support and resistance levels of limited predictive value given how much the price depends on binary clinical events rather than steady fundamentals.
Competitors

We don't have competitor information for this company yet.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.