valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

THUNDER MOUNTAIN GOLD INC (THMG) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$0.02 ComplexityAverage Updated
$0.00 $0.08
bear $0.00 base $0.04 bull $0.08 margin of safety $0.02 market price* $0.75
Business condition attached to the margin of safety The South Mountain purchase option (expiring November 2026) has been exercised or extended in writing, with the cash for any exercise price already in the company's bank account or firmly committed.
Thunder Mountain Gold is a pre-revenue mineral explorer. Its main asset is the South Mountain zinc, silver, gold, copper and lead project in Owyhee County, southwest Idaho, which it controls through a mining lease with an option to purchase, granted by its 75%-owned subsidiary Owyhee Gold Trust, for a capped $5 million. That option expires in November 2026. The company has never sold anything, so there are no earnings to value. Our owner-earnings measure (operating cash flow, less working-capital timing, less the cost of shares and options handed to insiders and consultants, less capital spending) was negative in every year from 2016 to 2025: between about -0.4 cents and -2.0 cents a share through 2024, with a ten-year median of about -1.0 cent, and about -3.5 cents in 2025 (against about -0.9 cents in 2024) as drilling, professional fees and option grants rose. Our first-year assumption of about $3.8 million of cash spending, roughly 3.6 cents a share on the enlarged share count, is in line with that 2025 result, not better than it. Unpaid officer pay was treated as a cost when earned, and the $1.1 million now owed for it is treated as a debt. The share count has grown from about 51 million in 2016 to about 95 million by mid-2026, and to about 105 million after the August financing and the planned pay settlement described below. The shares therefore rest on three things: cash, the deposit, and what it costs to turn one into the other. Cash and obligations. By August 7 the company held about $3.4 million of cash, including about $2.8 million of subscription money for a private placement; the placement closed on August 21 for $5.66 million gross (8,090,451 units, each with a half warrant exercisable at $1.00). Allowing for spending since, we estimate cash of about $5.6 million today (an estimate, because the latest quarterly report predates the closing). Against that the company owes about $1.1 million of ordinary liabilities, including a $205,000 note on a land purchase, plus $1,104,625 of deferred pay owed to its president, a technical advisor and a former CFO. In July the board approved paying that deferred pay in about 1.58 million shares, subject to TSX Venture Exchange approval; we treat it as done. That leaves about $4.5 million, roughly 4.3 cents a share, before further exploration spending, and spending of about $3.8 million a year would use it up in about 14 months. About 22 million older warrants (exercisable at $0.10 to $0.40) and the new warrants are not counted, because none of the values below reach their exercise prices. The deposit. South Mountain has a resource estimate effective December 31, 2023 of 223,000 tons measured and indicated (about 9% zinc, 4.3 ounces of silver and 0.06 ounces of gold per ton) and 959,000 tons inferred. It has no reserves and no completed preliminary economic assessment; the company lists one as its next step. What can be evidenced is what outside parties have paid. BeMetals took an option in 2019 and paid $1.1 million in cash over 2019 to 2021 plus 10 million of its own shares (worth $1.88 million when issued, and about $1.39 million once part was sold and the rest marked at the end of 2022); the option was terminated by agreement in December 2022. A Swiss investor, MFD, signed a letter in January 2025 to fund $1 million of project work in exchange for a 10% interest, but the reimbursement total was $203,498 at year-end 2025 and unchanged at June 30, 2026. That is the evidence we use. Base case, about 4 cents a share. Drilling and the economic assessment run through mid-2027, using about $2.85 million and leaving about $1.7 million of cash. A partner then signs an option on terms like BeMetals': cash of about $1.1 million and shares worth about $1.4 million after allowing for what BeMetals' shares later proved worth, paid over several years, with the partner paying for further work. The leftover cash is worth about $1.6 million and the partner payments about $2.3 million today, together about $3.9 million, or 3.7 cents a share. The ordinary creditors' $1.1 million is already deducted in the $4.5 million above, and the only borrowing is the $205,000 land note. If the deferred-pay settlement were not approved and the $1.1 million had to be paid in cash, this case would be about 3 cents. We credit only a repeat of a partner deal the company has done before. We leave out resource growth from drilling, higher metal prices and any production, because none is secured. Bull case, about 8 cents a share. Drilling extends the zone that remains open at depth, the assessment is completed, and a partner pays what MFD's letter implies for the whole project, a $10 million value, of which the company's 75% is $7.5 million, received over about three years and worth about $6.9 million today. With about $1.6 million of leftover cash that is about $8.5 million, or 8 cents a share. This requires MFD, or a party like it, to actually perform, which it has not yet done. Bear case, nothing. The November 2026 option lapses or can be exercised only through a heavily diluting raise of about $5 million; drilling and the assessment do not show economics that justify development; and no partner returns, as after BeMetals' exit in December 2022 and as junior explorers found in the 2008 to 2009 and 2015 to 2016 base-metal downturns. Spending of $3.8 million a year consumes the roughly $4.5 million of net cash by about the end of 2027, there is no revenue to fall back on, and further raises dilute holders toward nothing, as the share count has done for ten years. The case is zero rather than negative because the company has no large debt: the land note is $205,000 and no maturity or covenant materially affects the outcome. Margin-of-safety price, 2 cents. We are certain of the earnings level only in that it is negative, and our confidence in any positive value is low. The worst plausible outcome is losing the right to the project in November 2026, which the filings do not describe the consequences of, or spending the cash on drilling that finds nothing; with almost no debt nobody could force a liquidation, but shareholders would lose their money. The things we are most likely to be wrong about are whether a partner appears at all (BeMetals did, then left; MFD has funded about a fifth of its commitment in about 18 months) and whether the pay settlement is approved, which moves the base case from 4 cents to 3 cents. The price assumes a holding period of two to three years for drilling and an economic assessment to show whether the project is worth a partner's money, and the business pays nothing during that time. At 2 cents the whole company is priced at about $2.1 million against about $4.5 million of net cash after every recorded liability, so even if management spends a good part of that cash before anything turns up the price leaves room, and a partner deal like the one BeMetals signed would imply a return comfortably above the 20% target. That price applies only once the November 2026 option has been extended or exercised with the funding in place. Our previous estimate (base about 2 cents, bull about 6 cents) was set on the June 30 balance sheet and is not directly comparable. The main change in the business since then is the $5.66 million raised in August and the board's decision to pay deferred compensation in shares.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 -$0.04 ▼
Recomputed on the full current basis (the earlier row did not remove the working-capital movement). OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$(1,609,019); working-capital movement=+$86,611 (prepaid $(20,156); accounts payable and other accrued liabilities +$106,767); SBC=$1,124,045 (option grants to consultants, officers and directors); capex=cash land purchase $55,136, revenue nil so growth capex=$0 and maintenance capex=$55,136 (about $205,000 of the purchase price was seller-financed and is non-cash). OE=$(2,874,811); diluted shares=82,027,542; OE/sh=$(0.0350). Reconciliation: net loss $(2,824,759)+accrued reclamation $5,130+noncash lease $(46) = $(2,819,675); less capex $55,136 = $(2,874,811), ties exactly. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001062993-26-001714.
2024 -$0.01 ▼
Recomputed on the full current basis (the earlier row did not remove the working-capital movement). OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$(539,287); working-capital movement=+$44,438 (prepaid $(2,116); accounts payable and other accrued liabilities +$46,554); SBC=$0; capex=$0 (investing inflow was $384,981 of BeMetals share sale proceeds, not capex). OE=$(583,725); diluted shares=62,548,421; OE/sh=$(0.0093). Reconciliation: net loss $(626,111) + noncash lease $(469) + realized loss on investment $42,855 = $(583,725), ties exactly. Source: FY2024 10-K (accession 0001062993-25-006533), cross-checked to FY2025 10-K comparative column (accession 0001062993-26-001714).
2023 -$0.01 ▼
Recomputed (earlier row omitted the working-capital movement and the $52,176 land purchase shown in investing activities). OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$(543,995); working-capital movement=+$40,985 (prepaid $(18,674); accounts payable and accrued +$11,967; accrued legal fees $(10,000); deferred compensation +$63,125; advance from BeMetals $(5,433)); SBC=$0; capex=land purchase $52,176, revenue nil in both years so growth capex=$0 and maintenance capex=$52,176. OE=$(637,156); weighted-average shares=60,855,579 (as reported); OE/sh=$(0.0105). Reconciliation: net loss $(812,227)+depreciation $552+unrealized investment loss $179,604+realized loss on sale $47,091 = $(584,980); less capex $52,176 = $(637,156), ties exactly. Source: FY2023 10-K, accession 0001062993-24-006207.
2022 -$0.01 ▼
Recomputed on the full current basis (the earlier row did not remove the working-capital movement). OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$(402,136); working-capital movement=$(116,550) (prepaid $(1,723); accounts payable and accrued +$16,104; accrued legal fees $(20,000); accrued interest to related parties $(80,177); advance from BeMetals $(30,754)); SBC=$158,341; capex=$0. OE=$(443,927); diluted shares=60,855,579; OE/sh=$(0.0073). Reconciliation: net loss $(1,243,802)+depreciation $1,553+accrued reclamation $16,250+unrealized investment loss $782,072 = $(443,927) before the SBC add-back, ties exactly. Source: FY2022 10-K (accession 0001062993-23-007681), cross-checked to FY2023 10-K comparative column (accession 0001062993-24-006207).
2021 -$0.00 ▼
Recomputed on the full current basis (the earlier row did not remove the working-capital movement). OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$(257,816); working-capital movement=$(42,263) (prepaid +$1,738; accounts payable and accrued $(13,449); accrued related-party liability $(20,000); accrued interest to related parties $(8,355); advance from BeMetals $(2,197)); SBC=$0; capex=$0 (revenue nil). OE=$(215,553); diluted shares=60,384,839; OE/sh=$(0.0036). Reconciliation: net loss $(566,796)+depreciation $2,849 − gain on mineral interest $500,000 + unrealized investment loss $941,079 − gain on sale of investment $92,685 = $(215,553), ties exactly. Source: FY2021 10-K, accession 0001062993-22-008328.
2020 -$0.01 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$(271,260); working-capital movement=$(92,833) (prepaid $(1,304); accounts payable and accrued $(36,563); accrued related-party liability $(30,000); accrued interest to related parties +$15,189; advance from BeMetals $(40,155)); SBC=$159,740; capex=$0. OE=$(338,167); diluted shares=61,690,547; OE/sh=$(0.0055). Reconciliation: net income $1,221,681 + depreciation $20,956 − PPP forgiveness $48,000 − gain on mineral interest $250,000 − unrealized investment gain $1,282,804 = $(338,167), ties exactly. Source: FY2021 10-K comparative column (accession 0001062993-22-008328) and FY2020 10-K (accession 0001052918-21-000091).
2019 -$0.01 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$(316,295); working-capital movement=+$53,577 (prepaid +$10,601; accounts payable and accrued $(31,119); accrued related-party liability $(25,000); accrued interest to related parties +$20,556; advance from BeMetals +$78,539, treated as a liability movement); SBC=$117,088; capex=$0 (investing inflow was $350,000 of BeMetals option proceeds, not capex). OE=$(486,960); diluted shares=59,329,735; OE/sh=$(0.0082). Reconciliation (net income + non-cash charges other than SBC, which is treated as a cost): net income $1,087,083 + depreciation $32,310 − gain on mineral interest $1,754,398 + unrealized investment loss $148,045 = $(486,960), ties exactly. Cash interest paid $736. Source: FY2019 10-K, accession 0001052918-20-000055.
2018 -$0.01 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$(280,323); working-capital movement=+$295,050 (prepaid $(952); accounts payable and accrued +$45,781; accrued related-party liability +$60,372; accrued interest to related parties +$19,849; deferred compensation +$170,000); SBC=$0; capex=$0. OE=$(575,373); weighted-average basic and diluted shares=57,208,045; OE/sh=$(0.0101). Reconciliation: net loss $(632,687)+depreciation $48,425+discount amortization $8,889=$(575,373), ties exactly. Source: FY2019 10-K comparative column (accession 0001052918-20-000055) and FY2018 10-K (accession 0001052918-19-000067).
2017 -$0.01 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$(248,280); working-capital movement=+$333,154 (prepaid +$5,430; accounts payable and accrued +$5,498; accrued interest to related parties +$19,226; deferred payroll +$303,000); SBC (stock options issued for services)=$53,557; capex=$0 (only proceeds from sale of equipment of $41,000; revenue nil). OE=$(634,991); weighted-average basic and diluted shares=54,868,182; OE/sh=$(0.0116). Reconciliation: net loss $(710,708)+depreciation $70,251+loss on equipment sale $1,021+discount amortization $4,445=$(634,991), ties exactly. Source: FY2017 10-K, accession 0001052918-18-000090.
2016 -$0.02 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex. CFO=$(555,459); working-capital movement=+$292,612 (prepaid $(6,347); accounts payable and accrued $(71,539); accrued related-party liability +$58,275; accrued interest to related parties +$17,723; deferred payroll +$294,500, i.e. unpaid officer salary treated as a cash cost); SBC (stock options issued for services)=$175,199; capex=$0 (no PP&E purchases; revenue nil so growth capex=$0). OE=$(1,023,270); weighted-average basic and diluted shares=51,375,312; OE/sh=$(0.0199). Reconciliation: net loss $(1,038,317)+depreciation $15,047=$(1,023,270), ties exactly. Pre-revenue mineral explorer. Source: FY2017 10-K comparative column (accession 0001052918-18-000090) and FY2016 10-K (accession 0001052918-17-000172).

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
No sales to date. Operations are in Owyhee County, Idaho (West), where the South Mountain project is located, and Lander County, Nevada (West), where the Trout Creek exploration property is located.
Historical growth strategy
Pre-revenue explorer that has grown by funding drilling with repeated small private placements of shares and warrants, and by signing option or farm-in agreements with outside partners (BeMetals 2019 to 2022, MFD 2025) who pay cash, shares or project costs. It has also added adjacent claims and land around South Mountain and gained control of the project through the 2016 settlement that made it manager of Owyhee Gold Trust. It has never operated a mine.
Chart analysis
A chartist would see an OTC stock that spent most of the past several years in a low, narrow base and has since broken out into a strong uptrend: the 52-week range runs from roughly $0.21 to roughly $1.01 and the one-year gain is on the order of 160 percent. Price has pulled back from the high but remains well above its long-term base, which technicians would treat as the first zone of support, with the prior peak near $1.00 as resistance. Moves are exaggerated and gaps are common, so any breakout or breakdown is unreliable until confirmed. Bulls would call it a successful base breakout in a rising-metals backdrop; bears would call it an extended run that can retrace sharply.
Competitors

Companies we consider competitors of THMG. Tap a ticker to open our analysis of that company in a new tab.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.