valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

Relay Therapeutics, Inc. (RLAY) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$0.15 ComplexityHigh Updated
$0.32 $0.84
bear $0.32 base $0.36 bull $0.84 margin of safety $0.15 market price* $16.28
Business condition attached to the margin of safety A new collaboration or licensing deal with disclosed, non-contingent upfront/guaranteed payments that materially extends the funded operating runway beyond what current cash alone supports.
Relay Therapeutics is a clinical-stage precision oncology company that discovers and develops small-molecule cancer drugs using computational and structural biology tools. It has no approved products and no product sales; the limited revenue it reports comes from collaboration and licensing deals with larger drug companies. Two developments define its recent history. Genentech, which had partnered with Relay since December 2020 on the drug migoprotafib, terminated that partnership without cause effective January 7, 2025; Relay is no longer entitled to any further payments from Genentech and has stopped developing that drug. Separately, in December 2024 Relay out-licensed a second drug, lirafugratinib, to Elevar Therapeutics for an upfront payment. The revenue Relay booked in 2025 was driven mostly by recognition tied to that one transaction rather than an ongoing stream, and any future milestone or royalty payments from Elevar depend on Elevar's own success and have not been booked as likely to occur. Relay's remaining focus is largely zovegalisib, a drug that is the subject of a clinical trial collaboration with Pfizer begun in June 2024. Because Relay earns essentially no ongoing revenue while continuing to invest heavily in research, it has spent more cash than it has taken in every year since its 2020 IPO, funded along the way by follow-on stock sales (most recently in September 2024, and again in a larger offering in the first half of 2026). Management has, however, materially slowed the pace of spending: stock-based compensation, a large share of the expense base, fell about a third in 2025 versus 2024 and kept falling into 2026, alongside two rounds of internal restructuring aimed at cutting costs. As of mid-2026 Relay holds roughly $911 million in cash and investments and carries no meaningful debt, against about 218.5 million shares outstanding - a substantial cushion by biotech standards. But we can only assign value to results the company has actually secured, not to hoped-for trial outcomes, so our estimate treats that cash as being consumed over time by the pace of spending the company has actually disclosed, rather than assuming a drug approval or new deal that hasn't happened yet. - Bear case: spending stays near its 2024 level as remaining trials advance without a partner to share costs; at that pace the cash cushion funds roughly two more years before the company must raise more capital on unknown terms or curtail programs - a possibility we can't price in because its terms aren't knowable today. Value: about $0.32 per share. - Base case: spending keeps improving at roughly the pace shown over the last year, funding operations for a little under four years on current cash. Value: about $0.36 per share. - Bull case: cost discipline continues at the faster pace seen in the most recent quarters, consistent with the two restructurings already carried out, extending the funded runway to roughly five years. Value: about $0.84 per share. None of these figures include value for a successful drug approval, a new partnership, or milestone and royalty payments Relay has not yet earned - those are real possibilities but not things we can currently verify, so we leave them at zero rather than guess. That is also why the estimated value is so much lower than the cash on the balance sheet alone: nearly all of that cash is already earmarked, by the company's own reported spending pace, to fund a research program whose future output we cannot yet size. Given how much of the outcome here depends on binary clinical and financing events that a cash-flow estimate can't capture, the margin-of-safety price is set at a substantial discount to our already-conservative base case - around $0.15 per share - and would be revisited only if the company first secures a new, fully-funded collaboration with guaranteed payments that meaningfully extends its runway beyond what current cash alone supports.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 -$1.60 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex ($000). CFO=$(235,455). ΔWC (prepaid 1,612, op lease -4,272, AP & accrued -11,440, deferred revenue -7,679, other liabilities -1,527) = $(23,306). SBC=$62,419 (down 34% y/y, reflecting cost discipline/restructuring). Capex=$410, treated wholly as maintenance. OE = -235,455-(-23,306)-62,419-410 = $(274,978)K. Diluted shares=171,586,558. OE/sh=$(1.60). Reconciliation check: NetLoss(-276,479)+SBC(62,419)+D&A(3,557)+impairment of intangible(2,300)+loss on disposal of PP&E(1,003)+amort(-4,949)+ΔWC(-23,306)=-235,455, exact match to CFO. FY2025 collaboration revenue ($15.4M) was driven almost entirely by the December 2024 Exclusive License Agreement with Elevar Therapeutics (out-license of lirafugratinib/RLY-4008), not a recurring stream; future Elevar milestones/royalties are explicitly excluded from the transaction price in the filing as not yet probable, so none are credited going forward. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001193125-26-076739.
2024 -$2.52 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex ($000). CFO=$(249,107). ΔWC (prepaid -5,356, op lease 1,243, AP & accrued 10,268, deferred revenue 7,679, other liabilities 786) = $14,620. SBC=$94,139. Capex=$2,018, treated wholly as maintenance. OE = -249,107-14,620-94,139-2,018 = $(359,884)K. Diluted shares=142,867,844. OE/sh=$(2.52). Reconciliation check: NetLoss(-337,708)+SBC(94,139)+D&A(5,464)+net realized gain on investments(-101)+FVchg contingent consideration(-13,206)+amort(-12,315)+ΔWC(14,620)=-249,107, exact match to CFO. Note: FY2024 collaboration revenue ($10.0M) was substantially the last Genentech milestone; Genentech terminated the collaboration without cause effective Jan 7, 2025 — no further Genentech payments expected. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001193125-26-076739.
2023 -$2.92 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex ($000). CFO=$(300,316). ΔWC (AR 306, contract asset 4,913, prepaid -4,648, op lease 1,509, AP -2,394, accrued & other -32,144) = $(32,458). SBC=$86,031. Capex=$4,126, treated wholly as maintenance (revenue rose off a tiny base on one-off Genentech milestones, not capex-linked; ratio not meaningful). OE = -300,316-(-32,458)-86,031-4,126 = $(358,015)K. Diluted shares=122,576,527. OE/sh=$(2.92). Reconciliation check: NetLoss(-341,973)+SBC(86,031)+D&A(5,269)+amort(-10,763)+FVchg contingent consideration(-6,422)+ΔWC(-32,458)=-300,316, exact match to CFO. Source: FY2023 10-K, accession 0000950170-24-018797.
2022 -$2.73 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex ($000). CFO=$(229,490). ΔWC (AR 97, contract asset -376, prepaid -2,140, op lease -8,132, other assets 22, AP 1,989, accrued & other 20,056, deferred revenue -248) = $11,246. SBC=$56,138. Capex=$9,062, revenue declined 2022 vs 2021 (collaboration revenue fell to $1.38M from $3.03M) so growth capex=$0; treated wholly as maintenance. OE = -229,490-11,246-56,138-9,062 = $(305,936)K. Diluted shares=112,233,649. OE/sh=$(2.73). Reconciliation check: NetLoss(-290,509)+SBC(56,138)+D&A(4,130)+amort(1,182)+FVchg contingent consideration(-11,677)+ΔWC(11,246)=-229,490, exact match to CFO. Source: FY2023 10-K (comparative), accession 0000950170-24-018797.
2021 -$2.35 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex ($000). CFO=$(74,406). ΔWC (AR 74,677 [collection of 2020 Genentech receivable], contract asset 3,117, prepaid -2,681, op lease 277, other assets 22, AP 930, accrued & other 21,002) = $97,344. SBC=$48,454. Capex=$3,471 (revenue declined 2021 vs 2020 so growth capex=$0; also treated wholly as maintenance per judgment that capex is lab-infrastructure, not revenue-scaling). Also includes one-time non-cash items already embedded in CFO and left undisturbed: $123,000 acquired IPR&D write-off and $11,855 loss on initial VIE consolidation (2021 M&A-related, non-recurring, sunk acquisition cost — correctly added back automatically, flagged here as non-recurring for the growth path/bear case per methodology). OE = -74,406-97,344-48,454-3,471 = $(223,675)K. Diluted shares=95,136,719. OE/sh=$(2.35). Reconciliation check: NetLoss(-363,872)+SBC(48,454)+D&A(3,925)+amort(2,052)+FVchg contingent consideration(2,836)+IPR&D(123,000)+VIE(11,855)+ΔWC(97,344)=-74,406, exact match to CFO. Source: FY2023 10-K (comparative), accession 0000950170-24-018797.
2020 -$1.20 ▼
OE = CFO − ΔWC − SBC − maintenance capex, all figures $000 except per-share. CFO=$(102,489); reconciled ΔWC (WC lines in cash-flow stmt: prepaid -4,665, lease 571, AP -410, accrued & other 2,010, AR -75,000 [Genentech upfront receivable], contract asset -7,654, other assets -22) = $(85,170); SBC=$31,960; capex=$1,931, treated wholly as maintenance capex (lab/facility capex unrelated to collaboration-license revenue, so no meaningful capex/revenue growth ratio). OE = -102,489-(-85,170)-31,960-1,931 = $(51,210)K. Diluted shares (basic=diluted, net loss)=42,619,582. OE/sh=$(1.20). Reconciliation check: NetLoss(-52,412)+SBC(31,960)+D&A(3,549)+amort(-416)+ΔWC(-85,170)=-102,489, exact match to reported CFO. Source: FY2020 10-K, accession 0001564590-21-015518.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
pre-revenue
Historical growth strategy

We don't have historical growth strategy information for this company yet.

Chart analysis
Relay went public in July 2020 at $20 a share, part of that year's wave of well-funded biotech IPOs. Like much of that cohort, the stock trended down for years afterward as the broader biotech growth trade unwound and the company lost re-rating catalysts. A chartist would flag the loss of the Genentech partnership (announced January 2025) and the large follow-on stock offerings - September 2024, and another sizable raise in the first half of 2026 that grew the share count by roughly a quarter - as classic dilution events, each likely adding a fresh supply overhang around its offering price. With the share count having grown more than fivefold since the 2020 IPO, any technical support level has to be read against a much larger, more diluted share base than early holders bought into.
Competitors

We don't have competitor information for this company yet.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.