valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

Redwire Corp (RDW) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$2.20 ComplexityHigh Updated
-$3.00 $10.65
bear -$3.00 base $4.05 bull $10.65 margin of safety $2.20 market price* $8.39
Business condition attached to the margin of safety Gross margin sustaining at or above approximately 20% for at least two more quarters (extending the current two-quarter recovery to a four-quarter run), together with visible evidence that stock-based compensation is beginning to decline as the disclosed unrecognized award pool is consumed.
Redwire is a space-infrastructure and defense-technology manufacturer, formed by the 2021 merger of several small space-hardware businesses and taken public through a SPAC combination. In 2025 the company transformed itself again by acquiring Edge Autonomy, a maker of uncrewed aircraft systems (drones) with a factory in Europe, funded with a mix of new debt, new common stock, and cash. The combined company now reports through two segments: Space (satellite components, in-space manufacturing, digital engineering, mostly for NASA, the U.S. Space Force and other defense customers) and Defense Tech (Edge Autonomy's drones and related systems, sold to U.S. and allied international defense customers). Redwire has not generated positive owner earnings -- cash the owners could take out of the business after real running costs, growth spending and stock-based dilution -- in any year since it went public. 2025 was the worst year yet: gross margin collapsed to about 5% of revenue from 15% in 2024, driven mainly by two things the company disclosed explicitly -- a one-time non-cash accounting charge from stepping Edge Autonomy's inventory up to fair value at the acquisition date, and a sharp increase in cost overruns on existing contracts (engineers call these estimate-at-completion, or EAC, adjustments), which nearly tripled from 2024's level. Both 2024 and 2025 had unfavorable EAC adjustments -- a two-year pattern of programs costing more to execute than originally estimated, a real and recurring risk for this business, not a one-off. There is an encouraging counter-signal: in the first two quarters of 2026, gross margin recovered to roughly 27%, above even the pre-acquisition 2023 level, consistent with the company's own explanation that much of 2025's shortfall was transitional. Two consecutive quarters is a real, corroborated data point, but it follows directly on the heels of the one-time inventory charge rolling off, so it is not yet proof the underlying cost-overrun problem is fixed. The company also carries a large, disclosed pool of not-yet-expensed stock-based compensation (about $69 million at the end of 2025) tied mostly to equity awards issued to retain Edge Autonomy employees. As that pool is worked through over roughly the next two to four years, the very high current stock-compensation expense (recently running above 20% of revenue) should mechanically decline -- one of the more concrete paths this business has toward profitability. Balance sheet: Redwire's core operating debt is now small -- an approximately $48 million term loan maturing in 2027 -- and the company built a very large cash position (roughly $557 million as of mid-2026, apparently from a substantial stock offering) that dwarfs both that debt and a roughly $80 million convertible preferred stock obligation that sits ahead of common shareholders. That cash gives Redwire several years of runway even if losses continue at their recent pace, meaningfully reducing near-term financial distress risk, but it does not by itself make the underlying business economically self-sustaining. Multiple material weaknesses in internal accounting controls have been identified, including some acquired with Edge Autonomy; the company states none has produced a material misstatement, and remediation is underway, but this adds uncertainty around reported figures for a company that has already restated financials in the past. Three ways this could play out, valued today without regard to the current share price: Bear case: the 2024-2025 pattern of cost overruns continues, the recent margin recovery proves to have been mostly the fading of the one-time acquisition charge rather than a genuine fix, and stock-based compensation stays structurally high even after the disclosed award pool burns off. Under this path the business is a persistent cash drain and, discounted back, is worth meaningfully less than nothing per share once its (small) debt and preferred obligations are considered -- the cash cushion helps for a few years but does not change the math of a business that never earns its cost of capital. This case values the shares at roughly negative $3. Base case: the 2026 margin recovery mostly holds (low-20s%, allowing for continued but more moderate cost overruns), and stock-based compensation gradually declines as the disclosed award pool is consumed. Losses narrow over the next three to four years to roughly breakeven, then the business settles into a modest, sustained level of owner earnings serving its existing government and defense customer base, without assuming any new contract wins beyond what is already reflected in its $411 million order backlog. This case values the shares at roughly $4. Bull case: the demonstrated 27% gross margin holds, the stock-compensation pool burns off faster and is not replaced at the same rate, and the combined company's recent revenue growth (roughly 75% year-over-year in the first half of 2026) continues for a few more years as Edge Autonomy's production capacity, which the company has been actively expanding, ramps further. Redwire becomes a solidly profitable space-and-defense manufacturer within about five years. This case values the shares at roughly $10.65. Given how much of the base and bull cases depend on the 2026 margin recovery being real and durable rather than a one-time accounting artifact rolling off, and given the company's history of never having produced positive owner earnings, the margin-of-safety price does not credit the base-case value until the current margin level and a declining stock-compensation trend are confirmed for another year or more.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 -$1.60 ▼
OE = CFO - net WC cash effect - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(177.331)M; net WC cash effect=$(58.136)M (AP&accrued $(11.660)M, contract liability $(33.980)M use, AR $(2.321)M use, inventory $(6.652)M use, contract asset +$0.863M source, prepaid/other $(4.386)M use); SBC=$58.990M; capex=$13.479M; revenue grew $31.280M vs 2024; avg capex/revenue ratio=2.44% => growth capex=$0.764M => maintenance capex=$12.715M (mechanical figure; 2025 capex was elevated mainly by Edge Autonomy facility integration, not organic growth, so this likely understates the one-time character of some spend). OE = -177.331 - (-58.136) - 58.990 - 12.715 = $(190.900)M; diluted shares=119,544,268; OE/sh=$(1.597). FY2025 includes only a partial year of the Edge Autonomy acquisition (closed mid-2025), a one-time $13.6M non-cash inventory fair-value step-up, and $54.5M of unfavorable EAC cost-overrun adjustments (vs $17.7M in 2024), which depressed gross margin to 5% from 15%; H1 2026 gross margin recovered to ~27% for two consecutive quarters. Reconciliation: NI $(226.552)M + D&A $32.639M + SBC $58.990M + Impairment $20.898M + net WC $(58.136)M = $(172.161)M; adjusting for a $13.6M non-cash inventory step-up (add), a $16.1M non-cash warrant fair-value gain (subtract) and a $1.0M loss on debt extinguishment (add) gives $(173.661)M vs reported CFO $(177.331)M, a ~2% residual (deferred taxes/other minor items). Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001819810-26-000029.
2024 -$0.70 ▼
OE = CFO - net WC cash effect - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(17.348)M; net WC cash effect=$12.577M (AP&accrued +$4.365M, contract liability +$3.207M, AR +$14.670M source (AR balance decreased), inventory $(0.734)M use, contract asset $(7.138)M use, prepaid/other $(1.793)M use); SBC=$11.326M; capex=$6.399M; revenue grew $60.301M vs 2023; avg capex/revenue ratio=2.44% => growth capex=$1.472M => maintenance capex=$4.927M; OE = -17.348 - 12.577 - 11.326 - 4.927 = $(46.178)M; diluted shares=66,146,155; OE/sh=$(0.698). Reconciliation: NI $(114.315)M + D&A $11.692M + SBC $11.326M + net WC $12.577M = $(78.720)M vs CFO $(17.348)M; the ~$61M gap is explained by a $52.0M non-cash loss on fair-value remeasurement of legacy SPAC warrants (10-K Note D), leaving an immaterial ~$9M residual (deferred taxes/other). Source: FY2024 10-K, accession 0001819810-25-000063.
2023 -$0.29 ▼
OE = CFO - net WC cash effect - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$1.231M; net WC cash effect=$7.480M (AP&accrued $(3.280)M, contract liability +$22.736M source, AR $(5.562)M use, inventory $(0.044)M use, contract asset $(5.442)M use, prepaid/other $(0.928)M use); SBC=$8.658M; capex=$5.620M; revenue grew $83.251M vs 2022; avg capex/revenue ratio=2.44% => growth capex=$2.033M => maintenance capex=$3.587M; OE = 1.231 - 7.480 - 8.658 - 3.587 = $(18.494)M; diluted shares=64,654,153; OE/sh=$(0.286). Source: FY2023 10-K, accession 0001819810-24-000025.
2022 -$0.75 ▼
OE = CFO - net WC cash effect - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(31.657)M; net WC cash effect=$1.724M (AP&accrued $(0.001)M, contract liability +$8.270M source, AR $(6.646)M use, inventory $(0.978)M use, contract asset +$0.813M source, prepaid/other +$0.266M source); SBC=$10.786M; capex=$3.626M; revenue grew $22.948M vs 2021; 5-yr(2021-25) avg capex/revenue ratio=2.44% => growth capex=$0.560M => maintenance capex=$3.066M; OE = -31.657 - 1.724 - 10.786 - 3.066 = $(47.233)M; diluted shares=63,324,416; OE/sh=$(0.746). A $49.916M non-cash goodwill impairment is a standard CFO add-back requiring no separate adjustment. Source: FY2022 10-K, accession 0001819810-23-000020.
2021 -$1.33 ▼
OE = CFO - net working-capital cash effect - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(37.358)M; net WC cash effect=$(6.654)M (AP&accrued +$10.379M source, contract liability $(4.497)M use, AR $(6.819)M use, inventory $(0.195)M use, contract asset $(4.995)M use, prepaid/other $(0.527)M use); SBC=$27.112M; capex=$2.094M, treated fully as maintenance capex because the 2020 predecessor/successor stub periods from the SPAC merger make a clean prior-year revenue baseline for a growth-capex split unreliable; OE = -37.358 - (-6.654) - 27.112 - 2.094 = $(59.910)M; diluted shares=45,082,544; OE/sh=$(1.329). Source: FY2021 10-K, accession 0001819810-22-000025.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
Primarily United States federal government agencies (NASA, U.S. Space Force, Department of Defense) for the Space segment, with operations based mainly in the South (Florida) and West (Colorado); the Defense Tech segment (Edge Autonomy) adds sales to European and other allied international defense customers, with production and sales activity tied to a European manufacturing facility, alongside U.S. defense customers.
Historical growth strategy

We don't have historical growth strategy information for this company yet.

Chart analysis
A chartist would note that Redwire's stock has behaved like many other 2021-vintage SPAC combinations: a sharp initial de-rating in the years after listing, followed by a much more volatile regime beginning around the 2025 Edge Autonomy acquisition and the large new share issuance that funded it, as the stock became associated with the 'space plus drone/defense-tech' trading theme. The near-tripling of shares outstanding within about a year (roughly 67 million to over 220 million) is itself a chart-relevant fact -- that kind of dilution typically caps rallies and can produce a sawtooth pattern of sharp run-ups followed by supply-driven pullbacks around each capital raise.
Competitors

We don't have competitor information for this company yet.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.