valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. (OBIO) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$0.45 ComplexityHigh Updated
$0.35 $5.00
bear $0.35 base $1.25 bull $5.00 margin of safety $0.45 market price* $5.45
Orchestra BioMed Holdings (OBIO) is a clinical-stage medical device company built around two licensed technologies: AVIM Therapy, a pacemaker add-on for uncontrolled high blood pressure, and the Virtue Sirolimus AngioInfusion Balloon (Virtue SAB), for re-narrowed coronary arteries after stenting. Neither has FDA approval yet, and the company earns essentially no product revenue today. AVIM Therapy is exclusively licensed to Medtronic, the world's largest pacemaker maker, under an agreement that pays Orchestra between $500 and $1,600 per device for at least 12 years if the therapy is approved and sold. A completed pilot study already showed a statistically significant blood-pressure reduction of about 11 mmHg, and Medtronic has continued investing in the partnership, most recently agreeing in 2025 to integrate the therapy into its next-generation leadless pacemaker. The pivotal trial supporting FDA approval is completing patient enrollment around mid-2026, but no pivotal results exist yet, and approval, if it comes, is likely several years away. Virtue SAB is earlier and less certain: its prior commercial partner, Terumo, walked away from its distribution agreement in October 2025 (retaining only a right of first refusal, not a commitment), and a new, separate coronary trial only began enrolling patients that same month. Because there is no approved, selling product, the company has lost money every year since going public, and the dollar loss has grown each year (from roughly $34 million in 2022 to roughly $61 million in 2024), funded almost entirely by issuing new shares — the share count has more than quadrupled over that period. A one-time accounting item inflated reported 2025 results: the last of a legacy $30 million payment Terumo made back in 2019 was booked as revenue only because the relationship ended, not because of new business; we excluded that year when setting the recurring loss level. Cash burn has accelerated further in 2026 as both pivotal trials run at once and as Orchestra reimburses Medtronic for integration costs under the 2025 amendment. As of mid-2026 the company held about $110 million in cash and investments, funded partly by a $15 million loan from Hercules Capital (2028 maturity), an up-to-$35 million royalty-financing deal with Ligand Pharmaceuticals (repaid only out of future product royalties, so it costs shareholders nothing if no product ever reaches market), and a new $20 million convertible loan from Medtronic carrying an above-market 11% rate. Net of these claims, per-share cash today is modest and shrinking. Our bear case assumes the pivotal trial or FDA review disappoints and neither product reaches market in a reasonable time; the company keeps diluting shareholders to fund itself before eventually winding down or selling remaining assets, leaving a small residual value. Our base case assumes the pivotal data confirms the pilot's benefit, FDA approval follows around 2029, and Medtronic rolls the therapy out gradually — meaningful royalty income arrives, but only after several more years of dilution, and a portion of every dollar is owed to Ligand. Our bull case assumes a strong trial readout, a faster Medtronic rollout across its dominant pacemaker franchise, and a new commercial partner secured for Virtue SAB, making the company a genuine royalty earner within the decade. Given this is close to an all-or-nothing outcome with real financing claims ahead of shareholders, the margin-of-safety price assumes the worst case is a real possibility, leaving substantial room for the trial data to disappoint.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 -$1.11 ▼
OE = CFO - delta WC - SBC - maintenance capex = NI + D&A - maintenance capex. FY2025: NI=$(52,701)K; D&A=$327K; capex=$489K (maintenance; revenue technically rose to $33,482K but the increase is entirely a one-time, non-cash release of the ~$30.8M legacy Terumo deferred-revenue balance recognized upon the October 2025 termination of the Terumo distribution agreement, not organic growth, so growth capex=0); OE=$(52,863)K. Diluted shares=47,747,078. OE/sh=$(1.11). CAUTION: this print is inflated by the one-time deferred-revenue release; stripping the ~$30.8M non-recurring item gives a normalized OE/sh of roughly $(1.76), consistent with the FY2022-2024 trend of widening dollar losses partly offset by share-count growth. This year is excluded from the anchor window for that reason (see Analysis record). Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001104659-26-026754.
2024 -$1.66 ▼
OE = CFO - delta WC - SBC - maintenance capex = NI + D&A - maintenance capex. FY2024: NI=$(61,024)K; D&A=$308K; capex=$289K (all maintenance; revenue fell YoY from $2,760K to $2,638K so growth capex=0); OE=$(61,005)K. Diluted shares=36,821,042. OE/sh=$(1.66). Reconciliation: CFO=$(50,558)K = NI + D&A + SBC($10,615)K + working-capital movement; ties out with no unexplained residual. Source: FY2024 10-K, accession 0001558370-25-004161.
2023 -$1.47 ▼
OE = CFO - delta WC - SBC - maintenance capex = NI + D&A - maintenance capex. FY2023: NI=$(49,120)K; D&A=$287K; capex=$78K (all maintenance; revenue fell YoY from $3,533K to $2,760K so growth capex=0); OE=$(48,911)K. Diluted shares=33,225,227. OE/sh=$(1.47). Reconciliation: CFO=$(46,127)K = NI + D&A + SBC($7,625K) + working-capital movement($(4,919)K); ties out, no unexplained residual >5%. Source: FY2023 10-K, accession 0001558370-24-004083.
2022 -$2.27 ▼
OE = CFO - delta WC - SBC - maintenance capex, which equals NI + D&A - maintenance capex (no other material non-cash items; capex is immaterial and revenue declined YoY so growth capex=0). FY2022 (pre-merger recast, Orchestra BioMed Inc. operating company): NI=$(33,608)K; D&A=$222K; capex=$591K (all treated as maintenance, since revenue fell from prior year); OE=$(33,977)K. Diluted shares=14,988,584 (post-reverse-merger-equivalent share count as recast in the FY2023 Form 10-K comparative). OE/sh=$(2.27). Reconciliation: CFO=$(29,289)K = NI + D&A + SBC($3,375K) + working-capital movement($722K); ties out with no unexplained residual. Source: FY2023 10-K (comparative FY2022 column), accession 0001558370-24-004083. FY2020-2021 (pre-business-combination SPAC shell) excluded as not representative of the operating business.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
United States (Northeast) — headquartered in Pennsylvania. To date all revenue has been license/collaboration income from device partners (Medtronic, and historically Japan's Terumo) rather than direct product sales. If its lead product is approved, revenue-share payments would be earned as Medtronic sells devices in the United States, European Union and Japan.
Historical growth strategy

We don't have historical growth strategy information for this company yet.

Chart analysis
This reads as a classic post-de-SPAC clinical-stage medtech chart: a long, choppy decline from early post-merger highs as losses widened and shares were repeatedly issued to fund them, punctuated by sharp single-day spikes and air-pockets around trial-enrollment updates, partnership news (the 2025 Medtronic amendment, the Terumo exit) and financing announcements. Daily price ranges are wide relative to price, and the stock lacks a durable technical floor because the share count — and therefore the count against which any 'support level' is measured — keeps changing with each new offering. A recent reference point: Ligand's August 2025 warrants were struck at $3.67/share. A chartist would treat the name as effectively un-chartable in the normal sense until pivotal trial data removes the binary overhang; until then, price action is event-driven rather than trend-driven.
Competitors

We don't have competitor information for this company yet.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.