valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$0.65 ComplexityAverage Updated
$0.20 $2.91
bear $0.20 base $1.73 bull $2.91 margin of safety $0.65 market price* $2.14
Montauk Renewables is a U.S. renewable-energy company that captures methane released by decomposing waste — mostly at landfills, and increasingly at dairy farms — and converts it into renewable natural gas (RNG), renewable electricity, and tradeable environmental credits (RINs and RECs) sold under federal and state clean-fuel programs. Revenue has held roughly flat at $175-176 million over the past three years, but the pieces underneath have moved in different directions: the index price for its main environmental credit rose sharply in 2025, yet the price the company actually realized fell about 29% because of self-marketing timing decisions and a shift toward fixed-price contracts, while operating costs rose across several facilities as the company ran wellfield maintenance programs. Net income fell from $9.7 million in 2024 to $1.7 million in 2025 as a result, even though cash generation held up somewhat better than reported profit. The company is partway through a large, debt-funded expansion: a new dairy-manure digester project in North Carolina, conversion of its landfill power plant in Irvine, California so it also produces pipeline-quality gas, relocation of a facility at an Ohio landfill, and a second facility conversion, with another $100-150 million of spending planned for 2026. None of these projects yet has disclosed capacity, offtake pricing, or revenue guidance, so this valuation gives them only modest, conservative credit rather than assuming they pay off as hoped — the money already spent is real, but its return is not yet demonstrated in the numbers. Just before this year's annual report was filed, the company replaced its bank line with a new $200 million facility from a specialty lender, drawing $155 million immediately at a 10.25% interest rate — well above the roughly 6-6.5% its prior bank debt carried, and above the discount rate used to value the business here. That higher borrowing cost is reflected in the debt subtracted below. The company also depends on a small number of customers for a large share of sales — the top five accounted for roughly two-thirds to 69% of revenue in each of the last three years — worth keeping in mind alongside the usual swings in credit and gas prices. Three cases, each a continuous story rather than a percentage of another: Bear: the cost pressures and softer realized credit pricing seen in 2025 persist and then plateau at a lower level; the new growth projects add spending but no offsetting value is credited for them; and the existing landfill sites gradually produce less gas as they age and are eventually capped, consistent with the company's own past sale of gas rights at one site once it stopped producing economically. After the business is valued and the (now more expensive) debt is subtracted, this comes to about $0.20 per share. Base: the elevated maintenance costs the company has flagged continue through 2027, after which modest growth (about 3% a year) resumes as the North Carolina and Irvine projects reach commercial operation — credited only for reaching operation, not for hitting any particular scale, since none has been disclosed. This comes to about $1.73 per share after debt. Bull: the growth projects execute on budget and schedule, and realized credit pricing recovers toward levels the company has already achieved in 2022-2023. This comes to about $2.91 per share after debt. Value is only assigned to gas volumes, contracts, and cost levels the company has already demonstrated, not to the eventual payoff of a construction program that has not yet reported output or economics. Margin-of-safety price: $0.65 per share, set well below the base case to allow for the current expansion disappointing. One item that could not be fully reconciled from the filings: the 2023 split between routine (maintenance) and growth-project capital spending was not broken out by the company the way 2024 and 2025 were, so that year's figure was estimated by interpolation rather than taken directly from a disclosed number.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 $0.08 ▼
OE = NI + D&A + DeferredTax + AssetImpairment - maintenance_capex. NI=$1,748K; D&A=$29,972K; DeferredTax=$(4,278)K; AssetImpairment=$3,231K; total capex=$116,542K, of which company discloses $97,439K was named development capex (Montauk Ag Renewables $80,978K + Rumpke RNG relocation $8,726K + second Apex RNG facility $7,735K), leaving maintenance (non-development) capex=$19,103K. OE=$11,570K; diluted shares=143,076,091; OE/sh=$0.0809. Net income fell from $9,734K (2024) to $1,748K (2025) primarily on higher D&A, higher RNG-facility operating & maintenance costs (wellfield operational enhancement programs at Apex, Atascocita, Rumpke, Raeger facilities) and a lower average realized RIN price (down ~29% YoY) despite a higher RIN index price. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001193125-26-102364.
2024 $0.16 ▼
OE = NI + D&A + DeferredTax + AssetImpairment - maintenance_capex. NI=$9,734K; D&A=$23,515K; DeferredTax=$804K; AssetImpairment=$1,586K; total capex=$62,323K, of which company discloses $49,249K was named development capex (Montauk Ag Renewables $27,847K + second Apex RNG facility $12,643K + Bowerman RNG project $8,759K), leaving maintenance (non-development) capex=$13,074K. OE=$22,565K; diluted shares=142,397,493; OE/sh=$0.1585. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001193125-26-102364.
2023 $0.18 ▼
OE = NI + D&A + DeferredTax + AssetImpairment - maintenance_capex. NI=$14,948K; D&A=$21,158K; DeferredTax=$1,876K; AssetImpairment=$902K; maintenance capex estimated at $13,000K (2023 10-K does not break out development vs. non-development capex by name; estimated by interpolating between the 2022 pre-program level and the company-disclosed 2024 non-development figure, given total 2023 capex of $63,091K jumped sharply as the Bowerman/Montauk Ag Renewables/Apex development program ramped up). Development(growth) capex ~$50,091K excluded from this calc per project methodology. OE=$25,884K; diluted shares=142,151,640; OE/sh=$0.1821. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001193125-26-102364 (comparative figures) and FY2024 10-K accession 0000950170-25-039495.
2022 $0.32 ▼
OE = NI + D&A + DeferredTax + AssetImpairment - maintenance_capex. NI=$35,194K; D&A=$20,700K; DeferredTax=$6,618K; AssetImpairment=$4,852K; maintenance capex=$22,277K (all 2022 capex treated as maintenance; pre-dates the 2023-announced development project program). OE=$45,087K; diluted shares=142,579,389; OE/sh=$0.3163. Note: 2022 revenue benefited from an unusually high RIN/REC price environment, elevating this year's OE versus adjacent years. Source: FY2024 10-K, accession 0000950170-25-039495.
2021 $0.10 ▼
OE = NetIncome + D&A + DeferredTax + AssetImpairment - maintenance_capex (WC change and SBC cancel algebraically against CFO's add-back, per project formula). NI=$(4,528)K; D&A=$22,869K; DeferredTaxExpense=$4,252K; AssetImpairment=$1,191K; maintenance capex=$9,986K (all 2021 capex treated as maintenance; company's disclosed development-project capex program began in 2023). OE=$13,798K; diluted shares=141,015,213; OE/sh=$0.0978. Source: FY2023 10-K (restated figures), accession 0001193125-23-072678, and FY2025 10-K accession 0001193125-26-102364 for tag confirmation.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
United States only. West (California — Irvine/Bowerman facility), South (Texas — Atascocita; North Carolina — Montauk Ag Renewables dairy digester project), Midwest (Ohio — Rumpke). No revenue from outside the United States identified.
Historical growth strategy

We don't have historical growth strategy information for this company yet.

Chart analysis
MNTK is a small-cap name where a chartist would expect long stretches of drift punctuated by sharp single- and multi-day moves tied to headline events — EPA renewable-fuel-standard (RFS) rulemaking, RIN/REC price swings, and quarterly earnings — rather than a smooth trend, which can make standard trend and moving-average signals less reliable than on a larger, more widely-followed stock.
Competitors

We don't have competitor information for this company yet.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.