valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$25.95 Updated
$17.84 $78.46
bear $17.84 base $44.89 bull $78.46 margin of safety $25.95 market price* $26.43
Business condition attached to the margin of safety Two to three subsequent quarters of capital-spending disclosure confirm that the sharply reduced 2024 fleet spending reflects a genuine, sustainable leaner-fleet model rather than deferred equipment replacement that will require an above-normal catch-up capital program.
Hub Group moves freight without owning most of the trucks or rail lines it uses. Its largest business (Intermodal and Transportation Solutions) arranges for containers to travel long distances by rail and then be trucked the final short distance, and also brokers standalone truckload capacity; a smaller but growing Logistics segment runs warehousing, consolidation/fulfillment, and final-mile delivery, recently expanded through the 2022 purchase of TAGG Logistics, the 2023 purchase of Forward Air's final-mile business, and a 2024 majority investment in a Mexico-based logistics company (EASO) aimed at cross-border and nearshoring freight. This is a classically cyclical business. Freight rates and volumes move in multi-year waves driven by how much trucking capacity is sitting idle or scarce at any given time: 2018 was a tight, high-rate year; 2019-2020 were soft; 2021-2022 saw an extraordinary freight boom as capacity was scarce everywhere; and 2023-2024 have been a sustained freight recession as capacity flooded back in and rates fell. We built our estimate of normal, sustainable cash-generating power by looking at results across this entire up-and-down cycle - roughly the last nine years - rather than anchoring on either the recent boom or the current downturn, and used the middle (median) year of that cycle as the representative level. That level, on a per-share basis and after subtracting the equipment spending needed just to keep the existing fleet running (as opposed to spending to grow it), works out to a modest, unglamorous figure - well below what the company earned during the 2021-2022 boom, and interestingly, also below what it earned in 2024. That is because equipment spending in 2024 was unusually low (roughly a third of the historical average relative to revenue), which flatters recent cash flow but raises a real question about whether fleet replacement spending is being deferred and will need to catch up later - a risk we address in our downside case rather than by inflating this year's baseline. Our base case assumes the freight cycle behaves the way it always has: excess trucking capacity gradually exits over the next two to three years, intermodal and brokerage margins recover to something like their long-run average, and Hub continues returning cash to shareholders through buybacks (it has shrunk its share count by roughly 10% over the past several years, adjusted for a 2023 two-for-one stock split), while the newer logistics/final-mile businesses grow into a somewhat larger share of the company. Under this case, we estimate the shares are worth approximately $44.89 today. Our bear case assumes the current freight recession runs longer than usual - weak trucking values discourage capacity from leaving the market, pricing stays depressed, and intermodal continues to lose some ground to over-the-road trucking on service reliability. We also assume the deferred equipment spending mentioned above comes due, forcing several years of above-normal fleet replacement capital just as revenue stays weak, and that the recently acquired logistics businesses underperform, with the related acquisition costs (which are non-cash and already excluded from our cash-flow measure) not being replaced by durable new earnings. Under this case we estimate value of approximately $17.84 per share. Hub Group carries only modest debt relative to its size, so this case is weak, not one where debt burdens push the value negative. Our bull case assumes the freight cycle turns more decisively - tightening trucking capacity (accelerated by small-carrier exits and rising equipment/regulatory costs) drives a multi-year wave of freight shifting from truck back to rail, a normal seasonal peak season returns, and the newer logistics and cross-border businesses scale successfully into meaningfully larger, higher-margin contributors, all while buybacks continue. Under this case we estimate value of approximately $78.46 per share. A large share of all three estimates comes from the value we place on the business a decade and beyond from now, since Hub's core service - moving freight by rail and truck - does not have a fixed expiration date the way a patent or a single contract does; the equipment spending already built into our cash-flow figure is what keeps that engine running indefinitely. We have deliberately assumed only very slow real growth in that distant future (roughly 1% a year in our base case) given how mature and competitive freight logistics is. What would make this estimate wrong: a much longer or deeper freight downturn than the last one, a large unexpected step-up in fleet replacement spending, or the newer acquired logistics businesses failing to earn their purchase price. What would make this estimate too conservative: a faster-than-usual capacity shakeout in trucking, or the Mexico/cross-border logistics investment turning into a meaningfully larger growth driver than we have assumed. We could not fully resolve from the filings alone whether the unusually low 2024 equipment spending reflects a genuine, sustainable shift toward a leaner fleet model or simply deferred maintenance; we flag this plainly rather than resolve it either way.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2024 $3.78 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$194.419M; ΔWC=$(106.256)M (large swing: AR collections +$33.6M, AP down $73.9M, accrued expenses down $26.6M, non-current liabilities down $44.9M as freight-recession-era payables/reserves unwound); SBC=$19.157M; capex=$50.847M (sharply reduced fleet spend during downturn); revenue declined from $4,202.585M to $3,946.390M so growth capex=$0, maintenance capex=$50.847M; OE=$194.419M+$106.256M-$19.157M-$50.847M=$230.671M; diluted shares=61.104M; OE/sh=$3.78. Note: capex this low relative to the historical ~3.3%-of-revenue average raises the possibility of deferred fleet replacement that could require above-normal catch-up capex in future years; flagged for the valuation's bear case rather than adjusted in this figure. Source: FY2024 10-K (accession 0000950170-25-026866).
2023 $3.39 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$422.158M; ΔWC=$44.069M; SBC=$21.348M; capex=$140.068M; revenue declined from $5,340.490M to $4,202.585M (freight recession) so growth capex=$0, maintenance capex=$140.068M; OE=$422.158M-$44.069M-$21.348M-$140.068M=$216.673M; diluted shares=63.954M; OE/sh=$3.39. Source: FY2024 10-K (accession 0000950170-25-026866), comparative FY2023 column.
2022 $4.68 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$458.163M; ΔWC=$(59.083)M; SBC=$20.426M; capex=$219.140M (freight-boom peak fleet investment, incl. TAGG Logistics bolt-on acquisition integration); revenue grew from $4,232.383M to $5,340.490M; growth capex=3.274%x$1,108.107M=$36.281M; maintenance capex=$219.140M-$36.281M=$182.859M; OE=$458.163M+$59.083M-$20.426M-$182.859M=$313.961M; diluted shares (post-split)=67.118M; OE/sh=$4.68. Source: FY2024 10-K (accession 0000950170-25-026866), comparative FY2022 column (split-adjusted).
2021 $2.51 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$252.835M; ΔWC=$(46.159)M; SBC=$20.056M; capex=$132.952M; revenue grew from $3,495.644M to $4,232.383M; growth capex=3.274%x$736.739M=$24.125M; maintenance capex=$132.952M-$24.125M=$108.827M; OE=$252.835M+$46.159M-$20.056M-$108.827M=$170.111M; diluted shares (post 2023 2-for-1 split, as restated in FY2023 10-K)=67.784M; OE/sh=$2.51. Source: FY2021 10-K (accession 0000950170-22-002100) for cash-flow figures; share count from FY2023 10-K (accession 0000950170-24-021432) split-adjusted comparative.
2020 $1.44 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$174.954M; ΔWC=$(54.092)M; SBC=$17.053M; capex=$115.306M; revenue declined from $3,668.117M to $3,495.644M so growth capex=$0, maintenance capex=$115.306M; OE=$174.954M+$54.092M-$17.053M-$115.306M=$96.687M; diluted shares (split-adjusted)=67.086M; OE/sh=$1.44. Source: FY2021 10-K (accession 0000950170-22-002100), comparative FY2020 column.
2019 $1.95 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$254.509M; ΔWC=$13.089M; SBC=$16.286M; capex=$94.847M; revenue declined from $3,683.593M to $3,668.117M so growth capex=$0 and maintenance capex=total capex=$94.847M; OE=$254.509M-$13.089M-$16.286M-$94.847M=$130.287M; diluted shares (split-adjusted)=66.960M; OE/sh=$1.95. Source: FY2021 10-K (accession 0000950170-22-002100), comparative FY2019 column.
2018 $0.00 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$210.839M (includes large one-time items from the Unyson/Mode disposition: $132.448M gain on disposition and $5.798M transaction costs, both already netted out of CFO as non-cash/reconciling items so they do not inflate OE); ΔWC=$16.166M; SBC=$13.480M; capex=$199.791M (unusually high, partly fleet build tied to network changes around the disposition); revenue grew from $3,123.063M to $3,683.593M; growth capex=3.274%x$560.530M=$18.352M; maintenance capex=$199.791M-$18.352M=$181.439M; OE=$210.839M-$16.166M-$13.480M-$181.439M=-$0.246M (~$0); diluted shares (split-adjusted)=67.120M; OE/sh=$0.00 (breakeven). Source: FY2018 10-K (accession 0001564590-19-005778).
2017 $1.41 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$125.220M; ΔWC=$(41.069)M; SBC=$9.873M; capex=$74.541M; revenue grew from $2,750.449M(2016) to $3,123.063M(2017); capex_ratio (mean capex/revenue FY2016-2024)=3.274%; growth capex=3.274%x$372.614M=$12.199M; maintenance capex=$74.541M-$12.199M=$62.342M; OE=$125.220M+$41.069M-$9.873M-$62.342M=$94.074M; diluted shares (split-adjusted)=66.700M; OE/sh=$1.41. Source: FY2018 10-K (accession 0001564590-19-005778), comparative FY2017 column.
2016 $0.36 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$102.473M; ΔWC(sum of all working-capital/other-asset-liability lines in CF stmt)=$(38.018)M; SBC=$8.479M; capex=$107.409M; prior-year (2015) revenue not available on current basis (ASC606 revenue tag starts 2016) so growth-capex could not be computed and maintenance capex conservatively set equal to total capex=$107.409M; OE=$102.473M+$38.018M-$8.479M-$107.409M=$24.603M; diluted shares (split-adjusted for 2023 2-for-1 split)=67.898M; OE/sh=$0.36. Source: FY2018 10-K (accession 0001564590-19-005778), comparative FY2016 column.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography

We don't have sales geography information for this company yet.

Historical growth strategy

We don't have historical growth strategy information for this company yet.

Chart analysis

We don't have chart analysis for this company yet.

Competitors

We don't have competitor information for this company yet.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.