valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP (GEOS) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$0.00 Updated
-$14.24 $13.51
bear -$14.24 base -$12.75 bull $13.51 margin of safety $0.00 market price* $4.41
Business condition attached to the margin of safety Two to three consecutive quarters of owner earnings at or above breakeven - cash generated from operations that, after working-capital swings, stock compensation, and the capital needed to sustain the rental fleet, is neutral to positive. That would confirm the Smart Water segment's growth and the new 18-month reservoir-monitoring contract signed in mid-2025 are genuinely offsetting the decline in one-off seismic-equipment sales, rather than the continued cash burn seen through the first three quarters of fiscal 2026 (cash fell from $26.3 million to $2.8 million over that period).
Geospace Technologies designs and manufactures seismic and sensing equipment across three segments. Energy Solutions makes seismic recording equipment - most notably ocean-bottom nodes used to survey offshore oil and gas reservoirs - which customers either rent or buy outright; this segment is tied directly to oil and gas exploration spending and has historically been extremely volatile. Smart Water makes water-meter cables, connectors and a newer smart shutoff valve for municipal water utilities, and has been growing steadily and profitably. Intelligent Industrial (security, surveillance and IoT sensing products) is a smaller segment that has not yet reached profitability. Over the last ten fiscal years (2016-2025), Geospace generated positive owner earnings (cash profit after stock compensation and the capital spending needed just to maintain its existing business) in only two years - fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2023 - and lost money on this basis in the other eight, including fiscal 2025. The typical (median) year over this full cycle produced owner earnings of roughly negative $1.15 per share. Fiscal 2024 was unusually strong on the surface, helped by a one-time roughly $30 million sale of ocean-bottom-node equipment to a customer that had previously been renting it; fiscal 2025 revenue fell by about 18% as that one-time sale did not repeat, and owner earnings fell to about negative $2.10 per share. In its most recent annual filing (November 2025), management expected fiscal 2026 Energy Solutions revenue to grow meaningfully on the strength of a new 18-month reservoir-monitoring contract signed in mid-2025. The three quarters of fiscal 2026 reported since then have not borne that out: revenue has continued to run below the prior year's pace and cash used in operations has been larger than all of fiscal 2025, with cash on hand falling from $26.3 million to $2.8 million. We have weighted this actual, more recent trend more heavily than the year-old growth expectation. Owner earnings here were built from cash flow from operations, with stock-based compensation and working-capital swings (large, and a significant source of the year-to-year volatility in this business) removed, and only the portion of capital spending needed to sustain - not grow - the existing business deducted. Depreciation, amortization and impairment charges are added back automatically in this framework since they are non-cash; because Geospace's business genuinely requires ongoing spending on its seismic rental fleet to keep functioning, that ongoing spending is captured through the maintenance-capital-spending deduction rather than through the depreciation add-back. Our bear case assumes the ocean-bottom-node business does not find a new source of large equipment sales, competitive and pricing pressure continues, and Smart Water's growth is not enough to offset ongoing corporate costs; losses persist at roughly $1.20 to $2.60 per share a year for a decade before the business settles into a bare-survival, breakeven state with no further value created or destroyed. Our base case assumes the new reservoir-monitoring contract and ongoing cost discipline gradually narrow losses, from roughly negative $2.10 per share next year to roughly negative $0.40 per share a decade out, but the business never fully closes the gap to profitability over that period. Our bull case assumes Smart Water scales meaningfully and Energy Solutions stabilizes around its best historical showing (similar to fiscal 2023's positive $1.12 per share), with Geospace becoming sustainably, if modestly, profitable within about three years and holding near $1.20 per share a share annually thereafter; more than three-quarters of the bull-case value depends on the company actually sustaining that improved level for years beyond our ten-year forecast, not merely touching it once, so it rests on real diversification succeeding, not on an oil-market recovery. On this basis, both our bear case (about negative $14.24 per share) and our base case (about negative $12.75 per share) indicate a company that, on its recent cash-generating record, appears to owe more in ongoing losses than the business is presently worth - by a wide margin in the bear case. This is not a balance-sheet leverage problem; Geospace carries no debt and still holds some cash. It reflects a decade-long pattern of the business consuming more cash than it generates outside of a couple of unusually strong years. Only in our bull case, where the newer Smart Water business and a more contracted, less lumpy Energy Solutions segment both come together, does the company look attractively valued (about $13.51 per share). Given this, we see no margin-of-safety price today; that estimate would be revisited once the company's actual results - not just its stated outlook - show it can sustain owner earnings at or above breakeven for a few consecutive quarters.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 -$2.10 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(22,232)K; ΔWC=$(6,004)K (net use of cash: AR $(4,244)K, inventory $(7,571)K, other assets $(1,345)K, AP $2,353K, other liabilities $4,803K; added back); SBC=$1,505K; total capex=$9,064K (PP&E $7,973K + rental equipment $1,091K); revenue fell $135.60M->$110.80M so growth capex=$0, maintenance capex=$9,064K; OE=$(26,797)K; diluted shares=12,793,075; OE/sh=$(2.10). Reconciliation check: net loss $(9,724)K + D&A $10,146K + other non-cash items (impairment/inventory obsolescence/loss-on-disposal net) $650K - maintenance capex $9,064K nets to the same CFO-based figure once ΔWC is included; ties out exactly to reported CFO. capex_ratio used for growth-capex split = 10-yr mean(capex/revenue) FY2016-2025 = 10.46%. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001437749-25-036009.
2024 -$1.26 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(9,083)K; ΔWC=$(4,824)K (net use of cash; added back); SBC=$1,304K; total capex=$12,178K (PP&E $3,857K + rental equipment $8,321K); revenue grew $124.51M->$135.60M, growth capex=$1,160K, maintenance capex=$11,018K; OE=$(16,581)K; diluted shares=13,151,600; OE/sh=$(1.26). FY2024 included a one-time ~$30M Mariner OBN equipment sale that lifted revenue/GAAP income but not cash generation, since cash was absorbed by receivables/inventory and fleet capex. Source: FY2025 10-K (FY2024 comparative column), accession 0001437749-25-036009.
2023 $1.12 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$15,558K; ΔWC=$(10,753)K (net use of cash, mainly AR/inventory build; added back); SBC=$1,374K; total capex=$13,884K (PP&E $3,964K + rental equipment $9,920K); revenue grew $89.25M->$124.51M, growth capex=$3,689K, maintenance capex=$10,195K; OE=$14,742K; diluted shares=13,215,066; OE/sh=$1.12. Source: FY2023 10-K, accession 0001437749-23-032446.
2022 -$1.31 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(10,035)K (restated basis per FY2023 10-K); ΔWC=$(675)K (net use of cash; added back); SBC=$1,734K; total capex=$5,962K (PP&E $1,130K + rental equipment $4,832K); revenue fell $94.86M->$89.25M so growth capex=$0, maintenance capex=$5,962K; OE=$(17,056)K; diluted shares=12,987,996; OE/sh=$(1.31). Source: FY2023 10-K (FY2022 comparative column), accession 0001437749-23-032446.
2021 -$0.53 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(7,172)K; ΔWC=$(6,692)K (net use of cash; added back); SBC=$1,970K; total capex=$5,309K (PP&E $3,188K + rental equipment $2,121K); revenue grew $87.84M->$94.86M, growth capex=$735K, maintenance capex=$4,574K; OE=$(7,024)K; diluted shares=13,358,930; OE/sh=$(0.53). Source: FY2021 10-K, accession 0001564590-21-057727.
2020 $0.73 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$18,122K; ΔWC=$(2,509)K (net use of cash; added back); SBC=$2,305K; total capex=$8,403K (PP&E $2,916K + rental equipment $5,487K); revenue fell $95.81M->$87.84M so growth capex=$0, maintenance capex=$8,403K; OE=$9,923K; diluted shares=13,525,179; OE/sh=$0.73. Source: FY2021 10-K (FY2020 comparative column), accession 0001564590-21-057727.
2019 -$1.46 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$5,629K; ΔWC=$(11,102)K (net use of cash, mainly AR build; added back); SBC=$2,329K; total capex=$36,006K (PP&E $1,936K + rental equipment $34,070K, a major OBN rental-fleet buildout); revenue grew $75.75M->$95.81M, growth capex=$2,099K, maintenance capex=$33,907K; OE=$(19,505)K; diluted shares=13,388,626; OE/sh=$(1.46). Note: the FY2019 rental-fleet capex is mostly classified maintenance under the same-year revenue-growth formula even though it funded equipment later monetized via FY2024-2025 OBN sales - a known limitation of matching capex to same-year revenue for lumpy capital goods. Source: FY2019 10-K, accession 0001564590-19-044161.
2018 -$1.03 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(10,401)K; ΔWC=$(7,038)K (net use of cash in WC, stripped/added back); SBC=$2,318K; total capex=$8,234K (PP&E $1,721K + rental equipment $6,513K); revenue grew $73.72M->$75.75M, growth capex=$212K, maintenance capex=$8,022K; OE=$(13,703)K; diluted shares=13,250,867; OE/sh=$(1.03). Source: FY2019 10-K (FY2018 comparative column), accession 0001564590-19-044161.
2017 -$1.68 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$10,091K; ΔWC=$25,977K (large one-time source of cash, mainly $13.0M income-tax-receivable collection plus AR/inventory swings; stripped); SBC=$5,732K; total capex=$1,632K (PP&E $1,177K + rental equipment $455K); revenue grew $62.06M->$73.72M, capex_ratio(10yr mean FY16-25)=10.46%, growth capex=$1,220K, maintenance capex=$412K; OE=$(22,030)K; diluted shares=13,134,071; OE/sh=$(1.68). Source: FY2017 10-K, accession 0001564590-17-024421.
2016 -$0.93 ▼
OE = CFO - ΔWC - SBC - maintenance capex. CFO=$(1,695)K; ΔWC=$2,835K (net working-capital effect, a source of cash from tax-receivable/AR/inventory swings, per CF statement 'Effects of changes in operating assets and liabilities'; stripped out); SBC=$5,220K; total capex=$2,369K (PP&E $1,867K + rental equipment $502K); revenue fell YoY ($62.06M vs $84.87M FY2015) so growth capex=$0, maintenance capex=$2,369K; OE=$(12,119)K; diluted shares=13,044,875; OE/sh=$(0.93). Source: FY2017 10-K (FY2016 comparative column), accession 0001564590-17-024421.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography

We don't have sales geography information for this company yet.

Historical growth strategy

We don't have historical growth strategy information for this company yet.

Chart analysis

We don't have chart analysis for this company yet.

Competitors

We don't have competitor information for this company yet.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.