valueequityanalysis.com

Independent, business-by-business valuations built from company filings — owner earnings, a ten-year outlook, and a bear / base / bull range. Search a ticker to see our estimate of what the business is worth.

Not investment advice. We are not registered investment advisers, and the people behind this site may hold or trade positions in companies analyzed here. Full disclosures.

Dyne Therapeutics, Inc. (DYN) stock intrinsic value fair value estimate & owner earnings analysis

Margin of safety$2.50 ComplexityHigh Updated
$3.00 $18.00
bear $3.00 base $7.00 bull $18.00 margin of safety $2.50 market price* $14.25
Business condition attached to the margin of safety FDA acceptance (or approval) of the z-rostudirsen biologics license application without a requirement for an additional confirmatory trial, or positive registrational (REC) data for the DM1 program, expected in the first quarter of 2027.
Dyne Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing therapies for muscle diseases using its FORCE delivery platform, which conjugates antibody fragments to oligonucleotide payloads to target muscle tissue directly. The company has no approved products and no product revenue today; its two lead programs are z-rostudirsen for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients with mutations amenable to exon 51 skipping, and z-basivarsen for myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). The most important recent development: in December 2025, the company reported positive topline data from the registrational expansion cohort of its DELIVER trial for z-rostudirsen, showing strong dystrophin production versus placebo. It plans to file for U.S. accelerated approval in the second quarter of 2026 using dystrophin as a surrogate marker — the same regulatory pathway already used to approve several other exon-skipping DMD therapies from other companies, giving this route real precedent. The FDA has also granted the program Breakthrough Therapy and Orphan Drug designations. The DM1 program is earlier: an initial readout was positive, but the registrational data needed to support a filing is not expected until the first quarter of 2027, with a planned filing in the third quarter of 2027. Financially, the company holds about $1.1 billion of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities against roughly $200 million of secured term debt (a facility that carries a floating rate of prime plus a spread, currently around 10% — materially above what the company would pay if this were ordinary-risk debt, which is reflected as a modest deduction in the valuation). Management states this cash funds operations into the first quarter of 2028, which comfortably covers the FDA's expected decision on the DMD filing and the DM1 data readout without requiring new financing beforehand. Because there is no product revenue yet, operating losses have grown every year (to roughly $446 million in fiscal 2025) as the company has funded two late-stage programs simultaneously; this spending has been financed mostly by issuing new shares, and the share count has grown substantially as a result. Because approval has not yet been granted for either program, the three cases below reflect a real range of outcomes rather than a single forecast: Bear case ($3/share): the DMD filing is rejected or delayed for additional data, and the DM1 readout disappoints. No near-term product revenue materializes, and the company is left with its cash position, reduced by the near-certainty of needing additional financing once the current runway is exhausted without an approved product. No value is assigned to either pipeline program. Base case ($7/share): z-rostudirsen wins accelerated approval around mid-to-late 2027 and achieves a moderate share of the roughly 1,800-2,000 U.S. patients whose DMD is amenable to exon 51 skipping. This market already includes one approved competing therapy, and two additional companies have earlier-stage programs aimed at the identical patient population — a real, disclosed competitive fact that caps how much share and pricing power this case assumes, and tempers what would otherwise be a more optimistic projection. Value reflects current cash plus the present value of this moderate, multi-year revenue ramp, net of the company's continuing spend on its earlier-stage programs (which have no revenue credited to them here since their data isn't in yet). Bull case ($18/share): z-rostudirsen achieves stronger uptake and successful expansion into Europe and Japan (where regulatory designations are already in place), and the DM1 program's early positive signal is confirmed by its 2027 registrational data, adding a second approved product against a much larger patient population. Even here, the same competitive entrants are assumed to erode share over time, since nothing in the filings suggests this niche will remain uncontested. What would have to be true for the shares to be worth meaningfully more than the bear case: FDA acceptance and approval of the DMD filing on the data already reported, without a request for additional confirmatory trials. What would have to be true for the bull case: a positive DM1 readout in early 2027 that is strong enough to support the planned filing. The company's manufacturing and patent filings extend to numerous countries including China, but this reflects normal global IP protection, not Chinese ownership or operations — it remains a U.S.-based, Nasdaq-listed company.
Fiscal yearOwner's earningsMethodology
2025 -$2.70 ▼
OE = NI + D&A - maintenance capex. NI=$(446.214)M; D&A=$2.049M; capex=$1.920M; maintenance capex=$1.920M. OE=$(446.085)M; year-end common shares=164,950,540 (reflects large 2025 equity raise funding two BLA-track programs). OE/sh=$(2.70). Reconciliation check: CFO=$(403.207)M vs NI+D&A+SBC=$(446.214)+$2.049+$45.851=$(398.314)M; residual (ΔWC+other non-cash)=$(4.893)M, ~1% of CFO, confirming no material mis-signed working-capital or non-cash item. Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001193125-26-084178.
2024 -$3.11 ▼
OE = NI + D&A - maintenance capex. NI=$(317.418)M; D&A=$1.673M; capex=$2.376M; maintenance capex=$2.376M. OE=$(318.121)M; year-end common shares=102,318,629 (reflects large 2024 equity raises). OE/sh=$(3.11). Source: FY2025 10-K, accession 0001193125-26-084178.
2023 -$3.82 ▼
OE = NI + D&A - maintenance capex. NI=$(235.937)M; D&A=$1.673M; capex=$0.729M; maintenance capex=$0.729M. OE=$(234.993)M; year-end common shares=61,468,743; OE/sh=$(3.82). Source: FY2024 10-K, accession 0000950170-25-028356.
2022 -$3.05 ▼
OE = NI + D&A - maintenance capex. NI=$(168.099)M; D&A=$1.683M; capex=$3.067M; maintenance capex=$3.067M (no revenue). OE=$(169.483)M; year-end common shares=55,636,505; OE/sh=$(3.05). Source: FY2023 10-K, accession 0000950170-24-025402.
2021 -$2.94 ▼
OE = NI + D&A - maintenance capex (ΔWC+other non-cash nets to a small residual within CFO-NI reconciliation; no material mis-signed item). NI=$(149.291)M; D&A=$1.088M; capex=$3.618M; revenue=$0 so growth capex=$0, maintenance capex=$3.618M. OE=$(151.821)M; year-end common shares=51,569,381; OE/sh=$(2.94). Source: FY2022 10-K, accession 0000950170-23-005708.
2020 -$1.33 ▼
Pre-revenue clinical-stage biotech; no revenue tag exists. OE approximated as NI + D&A - maintenance capex (SBC and working-capital movement offset within the CFO-to-NI reconciliation residual, which is small, confirming no material mis-signed item; see FY2025 reconciliation note). NI=$(59.437)M; D&A=$0.700M; capex=$1.161M; growth capex=$0 (no revenue); maintenance capex=$1.161M. OE=$(59.898)M; shares outstanding (year-end common, basic=diluted given net losses)=45,076,574; OE/sh=$(1.33). Source: FY2021 10-K (comparative FY2020 figures), accession 0000950170-22-003290.

Owner's earnings per share by fiscal year, most recent first. Tap a row to see how that figure was calculated, including the source filing.

Sales geography
pre-revenue
Historical growth strategy

We don't have historical growth strategy information for this company yet.

Chart analysis
DYN is a catalyst-driven clinical biotech: the chart is dominated by sharp gaps around trial data releases and regulatory designation news (e.g., the December 2025 positive DELIVER topline readout) rather than any steady trend. A chartist would note long stretches of range-bound drift between catalysts, punctuated by single-day moves of 20% or more, making conventional trendline, moving-average or support/resistance analysis unreliable — the stock trades on binary news, not technical structure. Heavy share-count growth from repeated equity raises has also been a persistent overhang on the chart between catalysts.
Competitors

We don't have competitor information for this company yet.

Circle of competence

We don't have circle of competence information for this company yet.